IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/iab/iabkbe/200805.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Arbeitslosengeld-II-Empfänger: Nur Wenige profitieren von der privaten Arbeitsvermittlung

Author

Listed:
  • Bernhard, Sarah
  • Wolff, Joachim

Abstract

"Die öffentlichen Träger der Grundsicherung für Arbeitsuchende können Vermittlungsdienstleistungen über Ausschreibungen an private Dienstleister vergeben. Arbeitsuchende werden dabei zeitweise an private Vermittler überwiesen. Dies geschieht über die so genannte Beauftragung Dritter mit der gesamten Vermittlung. Arbeitslosengeld-II-Empfänger, die Anfang 2005 an eine private Vermittlung überwiesen wurden, haben insgesamt kaum davon profitiert. Ihre Beschäftigungschancen erhöhen sich - je nach Teilgruppe - gar nicht oder nur in geringem Umfang. Im Durchschnitt sind sie genauso häufig oder häufiger arbeitslos gemeldet oder in Maßnahmen aktiver Arbeitsmarktpolitik und beziehen genauso häufig Arbeitslosengeld II (Alg II) wie die Vergleichsgruppe. Nur einzelne, schwerer vermittelbare Gruppen von Alg-II-Empfängern profitieren von der Überweisung an private Vermittler. Im Jahr 2005 wurden rund 157 Tsd. Empfänger von Alg II zeitweise an private Vermittler mit dem Ziel der unmittelbaren Integration in den Arbeitsmarkt überwiesen. Im Jahr 2007 waren es nur noch 50 Tsd. Personen. In diesem Zeitraum ging auch die geplante Überweisungsdauer deutlich zurück. Seit dem Jahr 2005 hat sich die Struktur der überwiesenen Alg-II-Empfänger verändert: Im Jahr 2007 waren es relativ mehr Kurzzeitarbeitslose, behinderte Menschen, ausländische Mitbürger und mehr junge Erwachsene. Der Frauenanteil unter den Überwiesenen ist dagegen konstant geblieben und liegt weiterhin unter dem im Arbeitslosenbestand des SGB II." (Autorenreferat, IAB-Doku)

Suggested Citation

  • Bernhard, Sarah & Wolff, Joachim, 2008. "Arbeitslosengeld-II-Empfänger: Nur Wenige profitieren von der privaten Arbeitsvermittlung," IAB-Kurzbericht 200805, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany].
  • Handle: RePEc:iab:iabkbe:200805
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doku.iab.de/kurzber/2008/kb0508.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bernhard, Sarah & Wolff, Joachim, 2008. "Contracting out placement services in Germany : is assignment to private providers effective for needy job-seekers?," IAB-Discussion Paper 200805, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany].
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tomasz Gajderowicz & Maciej Jakubowski, 2019. "What works for disadvantaged unemployed: Private or public ALMP services? Evidence from (unplanned) RCT in Poland," Working Papers 2019-04, Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Warsaw.
    2. Jason Heyes & Ludek Rychly (ed.), 2013. "Labour Administration in Uncertain Times," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 15525.
    3. Rehwald, Kai & Rosholm, Michael & Svarer, Michael, 2015. "Are Public or Private Providers of Employment Services More Effective? Evidence from a Randomized Experiment," IZA Discussion Papers 9365, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    4. Rehwald, Kai & Rosholm, Michael & Svarer, Michael, 2017. "Do public or private providers of employment services matter for employment? Evidence from a randomized experiment," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 169-187.
    5. Caliendo, Marco & Mahlstedt, Robert & Mitnik, Oscar A., 2017. "Unobservable, but unimportant? The relevance of usually unobserved variables for the evaluation of labor market policies," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 14-25.
    6. Heyer, Gerd & Koch, Susanne & Stephan, Gesine & Wolff, Joachim, 2012. "Evaluation der aktiven Arbeitsmarktpolitik: Ein Sachstandsbericht für die Instrumentenreform 2011 (Evaluation of active labor market programs : a summary of recent results for the German program refor," Journal for Labour Market Research, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany], vol. 45(1), pages 41-62.
    7. Stephan Gesine, 2008. "The Effects of Active Labor Market Programs in Germany: An Investigation Using Different Definitions of Non-Treatment," Journal of Economics and Statistics (Jahrbuecher fuer Nationaloekonomie und Statistik), De Gruyter, vol. 228(5-6), pages 586-611, October.
    8. Marco Caliendo & Jens Hogenacker, 2012. "The German labor market after the Great Recession: successful reforms and future challenges," IZA Journal of European Labor Studies, Springer;Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit GmbH (IZA), vol. 1(1), pages 1-24, December.
    9. Luc Behaghel & Bruno Cr?pon & Marc Gurgand, 2014. "Private and Public Provision of Counseling to Job Seekers: Evidence from a Large Controlled Experiment," American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, American Economic Association, vol. 6(4), pages 142-174, October.
    10. Krister Sund, 2015. "Did the Introduction of Private Contractors Improve Turnover to Employment in the Swedish Labor Market?," Journal of Labor Research, Springer, vol. 36(4), pages 389-408, December.
    11. Tomasz Gajderowicz & Maciej Jakubowski, 2019. "What Works for Disadvantaged Unemployed: Private or Public ALMP Services? Evidence from Poland," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4), pages 332-346.
    12. Pierre Koning & C.J. Heinrich, 2009. "Cream-skimming, parking and other intended and unintended effects of performance-based contracting in social welfare services," CPB Discussion Paper 134, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
    13. Goller, Daniel & Harrer, Tamara & Lechner, Michael & Wolff, Joachim, 2021. "Active labour market policies for the long-term unemployed: New evidence from causal machine learning," Economics Working Paper Series 2108, University of St. Gallen, School of Economics and Political Science.
    14. Marco Caliendo & Ricarda Schmidl, 2016. "Youth unemployment and active labor market policies in Europe," IZA Journal of Labor Policy, Springer;Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit GmbH (IZA), vol. 5(1), pages 1-30, December.
    15. Wolff, Joachim & Nivorozhkin, Anton, 2008. "Start me up: The effectiveness of a self-employment programme for needy unemployed people in Germany," IAB-Discussion Paper 200820, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany].
    16. Caliendo, Marco, 2009. "Income Support Systems, Labor Market Policies and Labor Supply: The German Experience," IZA Discussion Papers 4665, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    17. Danula K. Gamage & Pedro S. Martins, 2018. "Evaluating Public-Private Partnerships in Employment Services: The Case of the UK Work Programme," Working Papers 87, Queen Mary, University of London, School of Business and Management, Centre for Globalisation Research.
    18. Stephan, Gesine & Zickert, Kathi, 2008. "Participation of unemployment benefit recipients in active labor market programs : before and after the German labor market reforms," IAB-Discussion Paper 200815, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany].
    19. Krug, Gerhard & Stephan, Gesine, 2013. "Is the Contracting-Out of Intensive Placement Services More Effective than Provision by the PES? Evidence from a Randomized Field Experiment," IZA Discussion Papers 7403, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    20. Bernhard, Sarah & Gartner, Hermann & Stephan, Gesine, 2008. "Wage Subsidies for Needy Job-Seekers and Their Effect on Individual Labour Market Outcomes after the German Reforms," IZA Discussion Papers 3772, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:iab:iabkbe:200805. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: IAB, Geschäftsbereich Wissenschaftliche Fachinformation und Bibliothek (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iabbbde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.