IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/wpaper/hal-02208505.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Recherche-développement militaire. Une comparaison entre les Etats-Unis et de l’Europe

Author

Listed:
  • Jacques Fontanel

    (CESICE - Centre d'études sur la sécurité internationale et les coopérations européennes - UPMF - Université Pierre Mendès France - Grenoble 2 - IEPG - Sciences Po Grenoble - Institut d'études politiques de Grenoble)

Abstract

Pour le gouvernement des États-Unis, la suprématie de la R & D militaire est une condition indispensable d'un pouvoir militaire suffisant pour combattre, par dissuasion ou par la force, les régimes politiques et les pays susceptibles de s'opposer aux valeurs démocratiques occidentales et de concurrencer les intérêts économiques nationaux. Les activités de recherche et développement aux États-Unis représentent 40% des dépenses mondiales du secteur et plus du tiers des nouvelles inventions brevetées. En Russie, les dépenses militaires considérables de la période soviétique ne sont plus renouvelées. Depuis la fin de la guerre froide, ces dépenses ont diminué principalement en Allemagne et en France. Plusieurs controverses ont eu lieu concernant la recherche et le développement dans le monde. Elles portent sur l'existence d'un complexe militaro-industriel, les effets négatifs des dépenses militaires sur la croissance économique, l'attitude de «passager clandestin» de l'Europe prenant en compte les dépenses de défense de l'OTAN, l'efficacité économique de la R & D militaire et économique et l'accroissement des retards dans la R & D militaire européenne.

Suggested Citation

  • Jacques Fontanel, 2010. "Recherche-développement militaire. Une comparaison entre les Etats-Unis et de l’Europe," Working Papers hal-02208505, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-02208505
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.univ-grenoble-alpes.fr/hal-02208505
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.univ-grenoble-alpes.fr/hal-02208505/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andrew James, 2006. "The Transatlantic Defence R&D Gap: Causes, Consequences And Controversies," Defence and Peace Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(3), pages 223-238.
    2. Fontanel, Jacques, 1995. "The economics of disarmament," Handbook of Defense Economics, in: Keith Hartley & Todd Sandler (ed.), Handbook of Defense Economics, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 19, pages 563-590, Elsevier.
    3. Ruttan, Vernon W., 2006. "Is War Necessary for Economic Growth?: Military Procurement and Technology Development," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780195188042.
    4. Jacques Fontanel & Manas Chatterji, 2008. "War, peace and security," Post-Print hal-02388881, HAL.
    5. Sandler,Todd & Hartley,Keith, 1995. "The Economics of Defense," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521447287, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jacques Fontanel, 2010. "Military research and development. United States and Europe comparisons," Post-Print hal-02207959, HAL.
    2. Jacques Fontanel, 2008. "Recherche-développement militaire. Une comparaison entre les efforts et engagements des Etats-Unis et de l’Europe," Post-Print hal-02161179, HAL.
    3. Jacques Fontanel, 2017. "La globalisation économique, un rapport de forces entre Etats et intérêts privés producteur d’inégalités, de conflits et de guerres économiques," Working Papers hal-02179483, HAL.
    4. Coyne,Christopher J., 2020. "Defense, Peace, and War Economics," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781108724036, September.
    5. Linda Andersson & Johan Lundberg & Magnus Sjostrom, 2007. "Regional Effects Of Military Base Closures: The Case Of Sweden," Defence and Peace Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(1), pages 87-97.
    6. Jacques Fontanel, 2020. "Une croissance économique sans progrès humain," Post-Print hal-03709037, HAL.
    7. Jacques Fontanel, 2016. "L’Organisation Mondiale du Commerce, Enjeu de pouvoir pour le commerce et le développement économique mondial," Working Papers hal-02083348, HAL.
    8. Enrico Moretti & Claudia Steinwender & John Van Reenen, 2019. "The intellectual spoils of war? Defense R&D, productivity and international spillovers," CEP Discussion Papers dp1662, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    9. Angus C. Chu & Ching-Chong Lai, 2012. "On the Growth and Welfare Effects of Defense R&D," Journal of Public Economic Theory, Association for Public Economic Theory, vol. 14(3), pages 473-492, June.
    10. Jacques Fontanel, 2015. "L’Organisation Mondiale du Commerce, Enjeu de pouvoir pour le commerce et le développement économique mondial," Working Papers hal-02077853, HAL.
    11. Gülbahar ÜÇLER, 2016. "Testing the relationship between military spending and private investments: Evidence from Turkey," Theoretical and Applied Economics, Asociatia Generala a Economistilor din Romania / Editura Economica, vol. 0(3(608), A), pages 307-318, Autumn.
    12. Fanny Coulomb & Jacques Fontanel, 2011. "Guerre et capitalisme," Working Papers hal-02185228, HAL.
    13. John Paul Dunne, 2012. "Military Spending, Growth, Development And Conflict," Defence and Peace Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(6), pages 549-557, December.
    14. Innocent.U. Duru & Millicent Adanne Eze & Bartholomew.O.N. Okafor & Abubakar Yusuf & Lawrence.O. Ede & Abubakar Sadiq Saleh, 2021. "Military Outlay and Economic Growth: The Scenarios of Lake Chad Basin Countries of the Republic of Chad and Nigeria," Growth, Asian Online Journal Publishing Group, vol. 8(1), pages 12-26.
    15. Jacques Fontanel, 2008. "Arms Control et désarmement Les conséquences économiques," Post-Print hal-02141385, HAL.
    16. Jacques Fontanel, 2014. "Les interprétations de la guerre et de l'économie," Post-Print hal-03637608, HAL.
    17. Gülbahar ÜÇLER, 2016. "Testing the relationship between military spending and private investments: Evidence from Turkey," Theoretical and Applied Economics, Asociatia Generala a Economistilor din Romania - AGER, vol. 0(3(608), A), pages 307-318, Autumn.
    18. Renaud Bellais & Martial Foucault & Jean-Michel Oudot, 2014. "Économie de la défense," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) hal-01052607, HAL.
    19. J. Paul Dunne, 2017. "War, peace, and development," Economics of Peace and Security Journal, EPS Publishing, vol. 12(2), pages 21-31, October.
    20. Fanny Coulomb & John Paul Dunne, 2008. "Economics, conflict and war," Post-Print hal-02051663, HAL.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-02208505. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.