IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/wpaper/hal-02148965.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Vers une éducation ouverte : Faire, réflexivité et culture pour une éducation-recherche

Author

Listed:
  • François-Xavier de Vaujany

    (Université Paris Dauphine-PSL - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres)

  • Amélie Bohas

    (CRET-LOG - Centre de Recherche sur le Transport et la Logistique - AMU - Aix Marseille Université)

  • Olivier Irrmann

    (UCL - Université catholique de Lille)

Abstract

Les sciences ouvertes et citoyennes connaissent un intérêt et croissant de la part des chercheurs, des étudiants et des activistes. L'idée de libérer et de coproduire la connaissance est déjà ancienne, mais le développement d'infrastructures digitales globales, les cultures du libre, de nouveaux régimes de propriétés et les mouvements maker et hacker ont accéléré un certain nombre de transformations. Les connaissances se produisent et se diffusent plus que jamais en dehors des lieux institutionnels de savoir. Cependant, une partie du monde académique traditionnel reste perméable à la culture des sciences ouvertes. Plus généralement, la dichotomie entre (co)production et diffusion de connaissances reste vive. Cette note de recherche propose un diagnostic de cette situation en partant tout d'abord des tendances en cours dans la société française. Constatant un certain nombre de décalages qui sont autant d'opportunités et de leviers pour une éducation ouverte, les auteurs s'appuient ensuite sur huit expérimentations réalisées en France et en Italie afin de faire des propositions. Toutes convergent vers l'idée d'une éducation ouverte qui ne serait que le prolongement ou le chiasme des sciences ouvertes. La note s'achève par trois propositions très politiques pour une éducation-recherche ouverte.

Suggested Citation

  • François-Xavier de Vaujany & Amélie Bohas & Olivier Irrmann, 2019. "Vers une éducation ouverte : Faire, réflexivité et culture pour une éducation-recherche," Working Papers hal-02148965, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-02148965
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://amu.hal.science/hal-02148965v2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://amu.hal.science/hal-02148965v2/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sacha Lussier & Jean-François Chanlat, 2017. "Les enseignants en gestion face aux nouvelles injonctions institutionnelles. Une étude France-Québec," Revue française de gestion, Lavoisier, vol. 0(6), pages 79-96.
    2. Eric Hand, 2010. "Citizen science: People power," Nature, Nature, vol. 466(7307), pages 685-687, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Paula Ungureanu & Stefan Haefliger & François-Xavier de Vaujany, 2022. "Seizing the Potentialities of Open Science: From a Community to a Platform Journal," Post-Print halshs-03565592, HAL.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Giovanni Brambilla & Francesca Pedrielli, 2020. "Smartphone-Based Participatory Soundscape Mapping for a More Sustainable Acoustic Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-20, September.
    2. Ebitu, Larmbert & Avery, Helen & Mourad, Khaldoon A. & Enyetu, Joshua, 2021. "Citizen science for sustainable agriculture – A systematic literature review," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    3. Ochieng, Hannington Odido & Ojiem, John & Otieno, Joyce, 2019. "Farmer versus Researcher data collection methodologies: Understanding variations and associated trade-offs," AfricArxiv ncw8a, Center for Open Science.
    4. Al Lily, Abdulrahman Essa, 2016. "Crowd-authoring: The art and politics of engaging 101 authors of educational technology," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 36(6), pages 1053-1061.
    5. Brosnan, Tess & Filep, Sebastian & Rock, Jenny, 2015. "Exploring synergies: Hopeful tourism and citizen science," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 96-98.
    6. Benedikt Fecher & Sascha Friesike, 2013. "Open Science: One Term, Five Schools of Thought," RatSWD Working Papers 218, German Data Forum (RatSWD).
    7. Julia Hahn & Miltos Ladikas, 2014. "Responsible Research and Innovation: a Global Perspective," Enterprise and Work Innovation Studies, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, IET/CICS.NOVA-Interdisciplinary Centre on Social Sciences, Faculty of Science and Technology, vol. 10(10), pages 9-27, December.
    8. Jenni Partanen, 2016. "Liquid planning, wiki-design—Learning from the Case Pispala," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 43(6), pages 997-1018, November.
    9. Prpić, John, 2017. "The Contours of Crowd Capability," SocArXiv 9mtzj, Center for Open Science.
    10. Johannes Halbe & Claudia Pahl-Wostl, 2019. "A Methodological Framework to Initiate and Design Transition Governance Processes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-25, February.
    11. Chinnasamy, Pennan & Maheshwari, Basant & Dillon, Peter & Purohit, Ramesh & Dashora, Yogita & Soni, Prahlad & Dashora, Ragini, 2018. "Estimation of specific yield using water table fluctuations and cropped area in a hardrock aquifer system of Rajasthan, India," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 146-155.
    12. Aaron W. Baur, 0. "Harnessing the social web to enhance insights into people’s opinions in business, government and public administration," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-21.
    13. Prpić, John, 2017. "The Theory of Crowd Capital," SocArXiv s6vnw, Center for Open Science.
    14. Bebbington, Jan & Russell, Shona & Thomson, Ian, 2017. "Accounting and sustainable development: Reflections and propositions," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 21-34.
    15. Aaron W. Baur, 2017. "Harnessing the social web to enhance insights into people’s opinions in business, government and public administration," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 231-251, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Citizen sciences; sciences ouvertes; Sciences citoyennes; Apprentissage ouverts; Communs de connaissances; Université dans la cité; Éducation ouverte; Communalisation; Open science;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-02148965. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.