IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirb/v43y2016i6p997-1018.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Liquid planning, wiki-design—Learning from the Case Pispala

Author

Listed:
  • Jenni Partanen

Abstract

As the key aspects of theories of complex systems have been established, the premises for academic research on planning and on planning praxis still necessitates the development of novel planning tools and approaches to address inevitable urban self-organizing transformations. We have accepted that cities emerge from bottom up. However, planning methods simulating this emergence are still limited. Progress has been made in recent decades and many systemic, evolutionary, and computing based planning approaches have been proposed. The work here builds on these premises. Network theoretical, computational, and democracy discourses have proposed proxy or liquid approaches as for genuinely democratic forms of decision-making. More importantly, they enable information organization from bottom up in a digital platform. This process actually follows the very principles of self-organization of information in information or cognitive sciences: entropy decreases as the “bits†of information self-organize into coherent classes. These principles are also applicable in bottom-up planning. Hence, and to bring this discourse closer to the planning realm, I compared the conceptualized structures of Liquid Democracy, SIRN cognitive model and prior self-organizing planning proposals in a bottom-up planning experiment in Pispala neighborhood, Tampere, Finland. I evaluated its capacity for self-organization of information and hypothesized that the case provides a frame for a new self-organizing planning method. Based on this evaluation a structure for a digitalized Liquid Planning procedure is suggested and discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Jenni Partanen, 2016. "Liquid planning, wiki-design—Learning from the Case Pispala," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 43(6), pages 997-1018, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:43:y:2016:i:6:p:997-1018
    DOI: 10.1177/0265813516647965
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0265813516647965
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0265813516647965?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sadahisa Kato & Jack Ahern, 2008. "'Learning by doing': adaptive planning as a strategy to address uncertainty in planning," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(4), pages 543-559.
    2. Oswald Devisch & Daniel Veestraeten, 2013. "From Sharing to Experimenting: How Mobile Technologies Are Helping Ordinary Citizens Regain Their Positions as Scientists," Journal of Urban Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(2), pages 63-76, April.
    3. Trisha Gura, 2013. "Citizen science: Amateur experts," Nature, Nature, vol. 496(7444), pages 259-261, April.
    4. Eric Hand, 2010. "Citizen science: People power," Nature, Nature, vol. 466(7307), pages 685-687, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Michelle A. Mycoo, 2018. "Achieving SDG 6: water resources sustainability in Caribbean Small Island Developing States through improved water governance," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 42(1), pages 54-68, February.
    2. Roman Lukyanenko & Andrea Wiggins & Holly K. Rosser, 0. "Citizen Science: An Information Quality Research Frontier," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-23.
    3. Silva Larson & Thomas G Measham & Liana J Williams, 2009. "Remotely Engaged? A Framework for Monitoring the Success of Stakeholder Engagement in Remote Regions," Socio-Economics and the Environment in Discussion (SEED) Working Paper Series 2009-11, CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems.
    4. Brosnan, Tess & Filep, Sebastian & Rock, Jenny, 2015. "Exploring synergies: Hopeful tourism and citizen science," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 96-98.
    5. Benedikt Fecher & Sascha Friesike, 2013. "Open Science: One Term, Five Schools of Thought," RatSWD Working Papers 218, German Data Forum (RatSWD).
    6. Ayodele Omoniyi Olagunju & Jill A. E. Blakley, 2017. "Towards an Environmental Governance Agenda in Regional Environmental Assessment: A Case Study of the Crown Managers Partnership," Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management (JEAPM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 19(02), pages 1-33, June.
    7. Jesus Cerquides & Mehmet Oğuz Mülâyim & Jerónimo Hernández-González & Amudha Ravi Shankar & Jose Luis Fernandez-Marquez, 2021. "A Conceptual Probabilistic Framework for Annotation Aggregation of Citizen Science Data," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-15, April.
    8. Evans, D.L. & Falagán, N. & Hardman, C.A. & Kourmpetli, S. & Liu, L. & Mead, B.R. & Davies, J.A.C., 2022. "Ecosystem service delivery by urban agriculture and green infrastructure – a systematic review," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    9. Melinda Butsch Kovacic & Shereen Elshaer & Theresa A. Baker & Vincent Hill & Edith Morris & Keren Mabisi & Ian Snider & Susan Gertz & Susan Hershberger & Lisa J. Martin, 2023. "The Eyewitness Community Survey: An Engaging Citizen Science Tool to Capture Reliable Data while Improving Community Participants’ Environmental Health Knowledge and Attitudes," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(14), pages 1-16, July.
    10. François-Xavier de Vaujany & Amélie Bohas & Olivier Irrmann, 2019. "Vers une éducation ouverte : Faire, réflexivité et culture pour une éducation-recherche," Working Papers hal-02148965, HAL.
    11. Balakrishnan Lekshmi & Dipanjan Saha & Rahul S. Sutar & Richa Singh & Shardul D. Prabhu & Arundhati M. Kamat & Shruti Sharma & Raghuvansh Saxena & Steven Loiselle & Shyam R. Asolekar, 2021. "Science & Technology Agenda for Blue-Green Spaces Inspired by Citizen Science: Case for Rejuvenation of Powai Lake," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-23, September.
    12. Johannes Halbe & Claudia Pahl-Wostl, 2019. "A Methodological Framework to Initiate and Design Transition Governance Processes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-25, February.
    13. Chinnasamy, Pennan & Maheshwari, Basant & Dillon, Peter & Purohit, Ramesh & Dashora, Yogita & Soni, Prahlad & Dashora, Ragini, 2018. "Estimation of specific yield using water table fluctuations and cropped area in a hardrock aquifer system of Rajasthan, India," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 146-155.
    14. Tim Busscher & Christian Zuidema & Taede Tillema & Jos Arts, 2019. "Learning in the face of change: The Dutch National Collaboration Programme on Air Quality," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 37(5), pages 929-945, August.
    15. Kevin Muldoon-Smith & Leo Moreton, 2022. "Planning Adaptation: Accommodating Complexity in the Built Environment," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(1), pages 44-55.
    16. Selma Leticia Capinzaiki Ottonicar & Paloma Marin Arraiza & Fabiano Armellini, 2020. "Opening Science and Innovation: Opportunities for Emerging Economies," Foresight and STI Governance (Foresight-Russia till No. 3/2015), National Research University Higher School of Economics, vol. 14(4), pages 95-111.
    17. Aaron W. Baur, 0. "Harnessing the social web to enhance insights into people’s opinions in business, government and public administration," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-21.
    18. Prpić, John, 2017. "The Theory of Crowd Capital," SocArXiv s6vnw, Center for Open Science.
    19. Unesco Unesco, 2015. "Water for a Sustainable World," Working Papers id:6657, eSocialSciences.
    20. Bebbington, Jan & Russell, Shona & Thomson, Ian, 2017. "Accounting and sustainable development: Reflections and propositions," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 21-34.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:43:y:2016:i:6:p:997-1018. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.