IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/wpaper/hal-01594134.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Investment project evaluation : social and economic indicators for sustainable development

Author

Listed:
  • Francois Bonnieux

    (Économie et Sociologie Rurales - INRA - Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique)

  • Jean Christophe Paoli

    (LRDE - Laboratoire de Recherches sur le Développement de l'Elevage - INRA - Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique)

Abstract

Après avoir montré les limites de l'analyse coûts-bénéfices appliquée aux questions environnementales, on propose une évaluation à partir d'une batterie d'indicateurs qui décrivent les impacts économiques, sociaux et environnementaux de petits projets. La méthode est appliquée à un ensemble de vingt-cinq projets réalisés dans cinq pays (Espagne, France, Grèce, Italie et Slovénie) ce qui permet une analyse comparative. Les projets concernent les infrastructures (barrage, assainissement, route forestière), la protection de la forêt, l'agrotourisme, les produits de qualité et la conservation du patrimoine. Les auteurs montrent en s'appuyant sur les techniques de l'analyse des données qu'il est possible de se limiter à un nombre restreint d'indicateurs pour mener à bien une évaluation que ce soit ex ante ou ex post.

Suggested Citation

  • Francois Bonnieux & Jean Christophe Paoli, 2004. "Investment project evaluation : social and economic indicators for sustainable development," Working Papers hal-01594134, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-01594134
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-01594134
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-01594134/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. A. Caparros & P. Campos & G. Montero, 2003. "An operative framework for total hicksian income measurement - Application to a multiple-use forest," Post-Print hal-00719124, HAL.
    2. Nick Hanley & Clive L. Spash, 1993. "Cost–Benefit Analysis and the Environment," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 205.
    3. Charles D. Kolstad, 2000. "Spatial Environmental and Resource Economics," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 1918.
    4. Francois Bonnieux & Pierre Dupraz, 1999. "Policy indicators and a typology of instruments [Critères d'évaluation et typologie des politiques]," Post-Print hal-02835524, HAL.
    5. Padilla, Emilio, 2002. "Intergenerational equity and sustainability," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 69-83, April.
    6. David Pearce & Giles Atkinson, 1998. "The concept of sustainable development: An evaluation of its usefulness ten years after Brundtland," Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics (SJES), Swiss Society of Economics and Statistics (SSES), vol. 134(III), pages 251-269, September.
    7. Olson, Mancur & Bailey, Martin J, 1981. "Positive Time Preference," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 89(1), pages 1-25, February.
    8. World Commission on Environment and Development,, 1987. "Our Common Future," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780192820808.
    9. Conway, Gordon R., 1987. "The properties of agroecosystems," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 24(2), pages 95-117.
    10. M. O. Hill, 1974. "Correspondence Analysis: A Neglected Multivariate Method," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 23(3), pages 340-354, November.
    11. Clem Tisdell, 1993. "Environmental Economics," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 429.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Francois Bonnieux, 2005. "A consistent set of economic and social indicators for project evaluation," Post-Print hal-01594082, HAL.
    2. Alba Rocio Gutierrez Garzon & Pete Bettinger & Jacek Siry & Bin Mei & Jesse Abrams, 2019. "The Terms Foresters and Planners in the United States Use to Infer Sustainability in Forest Management Plans: A Survey Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-20, December.
    3. Park, J. & Seaton, R. A. F., 1996. "Integrative research and sustainable agriculture," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 50(1), pages 81-100.
    4. John Creedy & Ross Guest, 2008. "Sustainable Preferences and Damage Abatement:Value Judgments and Implications for Consumption Streams," Department of Economics - Working Papers Series 1026, The University of Melbourne.
    5. Tanzi Smith, 2011. "Using critical systems thinking to foster an integrated approach to sustainability: a proposal for development practitioners," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 1-17, February.
    6. Anderson, Mark W. & Teisl, Mario & Noblet, Caroline, 2012. "Giving voice to the future in sustainability: Retrospective assessment to learn prospective stakeholder engagement," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 1-6.
    7. Andrei ROTH & Cătălin PETCU, 2015. "Sustainable Development, Energy And Climate Change In The European Union," SEA - Practical Application of Science, Romanian Foundation for Business Intelligence, Editorial Department, issue 7, pages 503-511, April.
    8. Buchholz, Wolfgang & Schumacher, Jan, 2010. "Discounting and welfare analysis over time: Choosing the [eta]," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 26(3), pages 372-385, September.
    9. Emilio Padilla, 2002. "Limitations and biases of conventional analysis of climate change. Towards an analysis coherent with sustainable development," Working Papers wp0206, Department of Applied Economics at Universitat Autonoma of Barcelona.
    10. Paolo Cupo & Rinalda Alberta Di Cerbo, 2016. "The determinants of ranking in sustainable efficiency of Italian farms," RIVISTA DI STUDI SULLA SOSTENIBILITA', FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2016(2), pages 141-159.
    11. Luke McGrath & Stephen Hynes & John McHale, 2020. "Linking Sustainable Development Assessment in Ireland and the European Union with Economic Theory," The Economic and Social Review, Economic and Social Studies, vol. 51(2), pages 327-355.
    12. Davidson, Marc D., 2014. "Zero discounting can compensate future generations for climate damage," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 40-47.
    13. R. Turner, 2007. "Limits to CBA in UK and European environmental policy: retrospects and future prospects," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 37(1), pages 253-269, May.
    14. Vojnovic, Igor & Darden, Joe T., 2013. "Class/racial conflict, intolerance, and distortions in urban form: Lessons for sustainability from the Detroit region," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 88-98.
    15. repec:lib:000cis:v:1:y:2013:i:1:p:16-26 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Otto Spijkers, 2018. "Intergenerational Equity and the Sustainable Development Goals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-12, October.
    17. Henckens, M.L.C.M. & Ryngaert, C.M.J. & Driessen, P.P.J. & Worrell, E., 2018. "Normative principles and the sustainable use of geologically scarce mineral resources," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 351-359.
    18. Frank L. Bartels & Bianca Cravenna, 2015. "Low Carbon Development: The Challenges of Green Energy Innovation," Globelics Working Paper Series 2015-03, Globelics - Global Network for Economics of Learning, Innovation, and Competence Building Systems, Aalborg University, Department of Business and Management.
    19. Helen Scarborough & Jeff Bennett, 2012. "Cost–Benefit Analysis and Distributional Preferences," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 14376.
    20. Farhad Noorbakhsh & Sanjeev Ranjan, "undated". "Integrating Environmental Impact Assessment and Economic Appraisal in Project Planning," Working Papers 9817, Business School - Economics, University of Glasgow.
    21. Tobias Hahn & Jonatan Pinkse & Lutz Preuss & Frank Figge, 2015. "Tensions in Corporate Sustainability: Towards an Integrative Framework," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 127(2), pages 297-316, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-01594134. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.