IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/wpaper/hal-00796215.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Dominances on fuzzy variables based on credibility measure

Author

Listed:
  • Christian Tassak

    (MASS - Laboratoire de Mathématiques appliquées aux Sciences Sociales - Université de Douala)

  • Jules Sadefo-Kamdem

    (LAMETA - Laboratoire Montpelliérain d'Économie Théorique et Appliquée - UM1 - Université Montpellier 1 - UPVM - Université Paul-Valéry - Montpellier 3 - INRA - Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique - Montpellier SupAgro - Centre international d'études supérieures en sciences agronomiques - UM - Université de Montpellier - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - Montpellier SupAgro - Institut national d’études supérieures agronomiques de Montpellier)

  • Louis Aimé Fono

    (MASS - Laboratoire de Mathématiques appliquées aux Sciences Sociales - Université de Douala)

Abstract

This paper studies three notions of fuzzy dominance based on credibility measure, namely, the fuzzy mean-risk dominance, the rst credibilistic dominance and the second credibilistic dominance. More precisely, we introduce and examine some properties of the Fuzzy Lower Partial Moments (FLPM) of a fuzzy variable and, we deduce the Fuzzy Kappa index (FK) of a fuzzy variable, that is, a risk-adjusted performance measure of an asset or a portfolio with fuzzy return. Based on the aforementioned notion, we introduce the fuzzy mean-risk dominance of two fuzzy variables and we characterize it in three speci c and interesting cases. We recall the rst credibilistic dominance and the second credibilistic dominance for fuzzy variables introduced earlier by Peng et al. [20]. We characterize the rst credibilistic dominance and determine some of its properties. We introduce and characterize the notion of crossing points of distributions of two fuzzy numbers and use them to characterize the second credibilistic dominance for fuzzy numbers. We justify that the rst credibilistic dominance is stronger than the fuzzy mean-risk dominance and the second credibilistic dominance, and neither of these two later implies the other.

Suggested Citation

  • Christian Tassak & Jules Sadefo-Kamdem & Louis Aimé Fono, 2012. "Dominances on fuzzy variables based on credibility measure," Working Papers hal-00796215, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-00796215
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-00796215v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-00796215v1/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ogryczak, Wlodzimierz & Ruszczynski, Andrzej, 1999. "From stochastic dominance to mean-risk models: Semideviations as risk measures," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 116(1), pages 33-50, July.
    2. Sadefo Kamdem, Jules & Tassak Deffo, Christian & Fono, Louis Aimé, 2012. "Moments and semi-moments for fuzzy portfolio selection," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 51(3), pages 517-530.
    3. Darinka Dentcheva & Andrzej Ruszczynski, 2004. "Optimization Under First Order Stochastic Dominance Constraints," GE, Growth, Math methods 0403002, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 07 Aug 2005.
    4. Brogan, Anita J. & Stidham Jr., Shaler, 2008. "Non-separation in the mean-lower-partial-moment portfolio optimization problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 184(2), pages 701-710, January.
    5. Huang, Dashan & Zhu, Shushang & Fabozzi, Frank J. & Fukushima, Masao, 2010. "Portfolio selection under distributional uncertainty: A relative robust CVaR approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 203(1), pages 185-194, May.
    6. Hadar, Josef & Russell, William R, 1969. "Rules for Ordering Uncertain Prospects," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 59(1), pages 25-34, March.
    7. Bawa, Vijay S., 1975. "Optimal rules for ordering uncertain prospects," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 2(1), pages 95-121, March.
    8. S. M. Sunoj & S. S. Maya, 2008. "The role of lower partial moments in stochastic modeling," Metron - International Journal of Statistics, Dipartimento di Statistica, Probabilità e Statistiche Applicate - University of Rome, vol. 0(2), pages 223-242.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kallio, Markku & Dehghan Hardoroudi, Nasim, 2018. "Second-order stochastic dominance constrained portfolio optimization: Theory and computational tests," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 264(2), pages 675-685.
    2. Dentcheva Darinka & Stock Gregory J. & Rekeda Ludmyla, 2011. "Mean-risk tests of stochastic dominance," Statistics & Risk Modeling, De Gruyter, vol. 28(2), pages 97-118, May.
    3. Christian Deffo Tassak & Louis Aimé Fono & Jules Sadefo-Kamdem, 2019. "Fuzzy lower partial moment and Mean-risk Dominance: An application for poverty Measurement," Working Papers hal-02433422, HAL.
    4. Andrey Lizyayev, 2012. "Stochastic dominance efficiency analysis of diversified portfolios: classification, comparison and refinements," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 196(1), pages 391-410, July.
    5. Andrey Lizyayev, 2010. "Stochastic Dominance Efficiency Analysis of Diversified Portfolios: Classification, Comparison and Refinements," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 10-084/2, Tinbergen Institute.
    6. Dentcheva, Darinka & Ruszczynski, Andrzej, 2006. "Portfolio optimization with stochastic dominance constraints," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 433-451, February.
    7. Oliver Linton & Esfandiar Maasoumi & Yoon-Jae Wang, 2002. "Consistent testing for stochastic dominance: a subsampling approach," CeMMAP working papers 03/02, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    8. Dipankar Mondal & N. Selvaraju, 2022. "Convexity, two-fund separation and asset ranking in a mean-LPM portfolio selection framework," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 44(1), pages 225-248, March.
    9. Lizyayev, Andrey & Ruszczyński, Andrzej, 2012. "Tractable Almost Stochastic Dominance," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 218(2), pages 448-455.
    10. Franklin G. Mixon Jr. & Richard J. Cebula, 2022. "Property Rights Freedom and Innovation: Eponymous Skills in Women's Gymnastics," Journal of Sports Economics, , vol. 23(4), pages 407-430, May.
    11. Walter J. Gutjahr & Alois Pichler, 2016. "Stochastic multi-objective optimization: a survey on non-scalarizing methods," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 236(2), pages 475-499, January.
    12. Anderson, Gordon & Leo, Teng Wah, 2021. "Sufficient conditions for jth order stochastic dominance for discrete cardinal variables, and their formulae," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    13. Roger P. Bey & Richard C. Burgess & Richard B. Kearns, 1984. "Moving Stochastic Dominance: An Alternative Method For Testing Market Efficiency," Journal of Financial Research, Southern Finance Association;Southwestern Finance Association, vol. 7(3), pages 185-196, September.
    14. Nilay Noyan, 2010. "Alternate risk measures for emergency medical service system design," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 181(1), pages 559-589, December.
    15. Pagratis, Spyros & Topaloglou, Nikolas & Tsionas, Mike, 2017. "System stress testing of bank liquidity risk," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 73(PA), pages 22-40.
    16. Merton, Robert, 1990. "Capital market theory and the pricing of financial securities," Handbook of Monetary Economics, in: B. M. Friedman & F. H. Hahn (ed.), Handbook of Monetary Economics, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 11, pages 497-581, Elsevier.
    17. Liu, Yong & Xiao, Feng & Shen, Minyu & Zhao, Lin & Li, Lu, 2024. "The k-th order mean-deviation model for route choice under uncertainty," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    18. Daskalaki, Charoula & Skiadopoulos, George & Topaloglou, Nikolas, 2017. "Diversification benefits of commodities: A stochastic dominance efficiency approach," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 250-269.
    19. Thorlund-Petersen, Lars, 2001. "Third-degree stochastic dominance and axioms for a convex marginal utility function," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 167-199, March.
    20. Salo, Ahti & Doumpos, Michalis & Liesiö, Juuso & Zopounidis, Constantin, 2024. "Fifty years of portfolio optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 318(1), pages 1-18.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-00796215. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.