IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/spmain/hal-03417109.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Pour défendre le quotient familial

Author

Listed:
  • Henri Sterdyniak

    (OFCE - Observatoire français des conjonctures économiques (Sciences Po) - Sciences Po - Sciences Po)

Abstract

System The family quotient is used to determine individual income tax according to the taxpayer's filing status (family status and dependency exemptions). The French family quotient system ensures a fair breakdown of income tax between families in the following way : two families of different sizes have the same tax burdens when their standards of living are the same (as measured by income in Consumption Units). However, as family benefits are a lot lower than the cost of children, the fact of having children leads to a drop in the standard of living except in the case of extremely low-income families. This drop is sharper when the family is well-off. The family quotient system is criticized by certain authors who have drawn their inspiration from other countries' examples and advocate reducing the tax credit allocated to well-off families. These savings would be used for such purposes as increasing family benefits or reducing the tax burden of other categories of taxpayers. In fact, such reforms would emphasize the difference between the standards of living of well-off families with children and childless couples or single people with the same primary income. They would run counter to the logic of the French tax system. It is not the family quotient that makes the French tax and social security levies system fairly unprogressive, but the high weight of social contributions compared to direct taxes.

Suggested Citation

  • Henri Sterdyniak, 1992. "Pour défendre le quotient familial," SciencePo Working papers Main hal-03417109, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:spmain:hal-03417109
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal-sciencespo.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03417109
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sandrine Cazes, 1993. "Protection sociale et intégration économique européenne," Revue de l'OFCE, Programme National Persée, vol. 43(1), pages 135-167.
    2. repec:hal:wpspec:info:hdl:2441/5272 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Patrick Moyes & Alain Trannoy, 1999. "Le quotient familial : une structure fiscale cohérente avec le critère de Lorenz relatif," Économie et Prévision, Programme National Persée, vol. 138(2), pages 111-124.
    4. Michel Grignon & Antoine Math, 1996. "Simulation des conséquences redistributives de divers modes de renforcement de la sélectivité des allocations familiales," Économie et Prévision, Programme National Persée, vol. 122(1), pages 13-31.
    5. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/1u4nmlgre68gopcegtmgm6cb5s is not listed on IDEAS
    6. repec:spo:wpecon:info:hdl:2441/5272 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Guillaume Allegre & Hélène Périvier & Muriel Pucci Porte, 2019. "Imposition des couples en France et statut marital : simulation de trois réformes du quotient conjugal," SciencePo Working papers Main hal-03403186, HAL.
    8. Jean-Marie Monnier, 2000. "L'équivalence fiscale des revenus et la réforme de l'impôt sur le revenu," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) hal-00677605, HAL.
    9. Henri Sterdyniak, 2004. "Contre l'individualisation des droits sociaux," Revue de l'OFCE, Presses de Sciences-Po, vol. 90(3), pages 419-460.
    10. Laisney, François & Beninger, Denis & Beblo, Miriam, 2003. "Family Tax Splitting: A Microsimulation of its Potential Labour Supply and Intra-household Welfare Effects in Germany," ZEW Discussion Papers 03-32, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    11. repec:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/6o65lgig8d0qcro9oj599gl90 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. repec:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/1u4nmlgre68gopcegtmgm6cb5s is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Ai-Thu Dang & Jean-Marie Monnier, 2011. "Gender Regimes and Welfare States in France: A historical perspective," EconomiX Working Papers 2011-40, University of Paris Nanterre, EconomiX.
    14. Élise Amar & Sophie Guérin, 2007. "Se marier ou non : le droit fiscal peut-il aider à choisir ?," Économie et Statistique, Programme National Persée, vol. 401(1), pages 23-37.
    15. François Legendre & Florence Thibault, 2007. "Les concubins et l’impôt sur le revenu en France," Économie et Statistique, Programme National Persée, vol. 401(1), pages 3-21.
    16. Damien Échevin, 2003. "L'individualisation de l'impôt sur le revenu : équitable ou pas ?," Economie & Prévision, La Documentation Française, vol. 0(4), pages 149-165.
    17. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/6o65lgig8d0qcro9oj599gl90 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Guillaume Allegre & Hélène Périvier & Muriel Pucci Porte, 2019. "Imposition des couples en France et statut marital : simulation de trois réformes du quotient familial," SciencePo Working papers Main hal-03403189, HAL.
    19. François Legendre, 1993. "Évaluation empirique de quelques réformes de l'impôt sur le revenu," Économie et Prévision, Programme National Persée, vol. 110(4), pages 35-62.
    20. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/5272 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. repec:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/5272 is not listed on IDEAS

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:spmain:hal-03417109. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Contact - Sciences Po Departement of Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.