IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/halshs-02387200.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Dubaï, a hub for Dhow shipping? Study of the connectivity between standardized networks and local networks

Author

Listed:
  • Emeric Lendjel

    (CES - Centre d'économie de la Sorbonne - UP1 - Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Nora Marei

    (PRODIG - Pôle de recherche pour l'organisation et la diffusion de l'information géographique - UP1 - Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne - IRD - Institut de Recherche pour le Développement - UP4 - Université Paris-Sorbonne - AgroParisTech - UPD7 - Université Paris Diderot - Paris 7 - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

Abstract

The persistence of dhow shipping in the Indian Ocean, the Persian Gulf and part of the Red Sea is puzzling for the maritime economist. Indeed, nowadays, almost every commodity can be carried easily and cheaply through the global network of container shipping lines, directly or through a hub (Song & Panayides, 2015). Given the difference of capacity between a dhow (even big, like a "500-tons baghlah"; Martin, 1980) and a containership (even a small 1200 TEU feeder one), the survival of dhows in such a competitive environment is puzzling. Of course, in the thousand-year history of dhows (Martin, 1980; Sheriff, 2010), the arrival of new containerized transport services in the 1980s (Stopford, 2009) is relatively recent. But dhow shipping is still active in the region. In Dubai for instance, more than 400 dhows can be seen on a regular basis (in a census based on satellite pictures). Thus, two systems of maritime transport are coexisting and remaining distinct, while carrying the same type of good. Theoretically, only the most efficient units of production should survive in a fierce competitive environment such as the one in the maritime sector (Kessides and Tang, 2010). Such differences of size and flows between dhows and container ships should not be observable on a given flow trade nowadays. Two explanations are at least possible. Dhows and container ships may be either complementary for the same commodities, or dually fitted for different kind of commodities. The purpose of this article is to test the first explanation with the help of the "footprints" let by ships as taken by satellite pictures displayed by googlemaps. Indeed, given the difference of size between a container ship and a dhow, dhows are able to reach every small coastal city contrary to container ships. Thus, ships footprints let on satellite pictures allow to test the existence of a complementarity between the network of dhows and container shipping lines. Additionally, those ships' footprints allow to test the proximity of dhow ports with container terminals. In this perspective, different norms of shipping are interconnected in big ports where container ships and dhows are exchanging cargo. The paper puts forward several hypothesis to explain how and where those norms are traded in big ports. The article starts with a quick survey of the existing literature, then presents its theoretical and methodological frame, and tests the complementarity/duality of the means of transport, and the level of inclusion of the port in the city. Finally, several hypothesis about the normalization process of dhow trade are laid down to finalize the the test of the level of connectivity between standardized networks and local networks.

Suggested Citation

  • Emeric Lendjel & Nora Marei, 2019. "Dubaï, a hub for Dhow shipping? Study of the connectivity between standardized networks and local networks," Post-Print halshs-02387200, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-02387200
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-02387200
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-02387200/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ioannis Kessides & Li Tang, 2010. "Sunk Costs, Market Contestability, and the Size Distribution of Firms," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 37(3), pages 215-236, November.
    2. Angela Stefania Bergantino & Simona Bolis, 2008. "Monetary values of transport service attributes: land versus maritime ro-ro transport. An application using adaptive stated preferences," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(2), pages 159-174, April.
    3. Paul Krugman, 1998. "Space: The Final Frontier," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 12(2), pages 161-174, Spring.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Emeric Lendjel & Nora Marei, 2019. "Dubaï, a hub for Dhow shipping? Study of the connectivity between standardized networks and local networks," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-02387200, HAL.
    2. George A. Erickcek & Hannah McKinney, 2004. "Small Cities Blues: Looking for Growth Factors in Small and Medium-Sized Cities," Upjohn Working Papers 04-100, W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.
    3. Yang, Yong, 2012. "Agglomeration density and tourism development in China: An empirical research based on dynamic panel data model," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(6), pages 1347-1359.
    4. Ademir Rocha & Fernando Perobelli, 2020. "Spatial distribution of logistics services in Brazil: A potential market analysis," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 12(1), pages 185-217, February.
    5. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/8001 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Holly, Sean & Pesaran, M. Hashem & Yamagata, Takashi, 2010. "A spatio-temporal model of house prices in the USA," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 158(1), pages 160-173, September.
    7. Arnstein Gjestland & Inge Thorsen & Jan Ubøe, 2006. "Some aspects of the intraregional spatial distribution of local sector activities," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 40(3), pages 559-582, August.
    8. Fujita, Masahisa & Thisse, Jacques-François, 2009. "New Economic Geography: An appraisal on the occasion of Paul Krugman's 2008 Nobel Prize in Economic Sciences," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 39(2), pages 109-119, March.
    9. Anderson, Simon P. & de Palma, Andre, 1999. "Reverse discrete choice models," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 29(6), pages 745-764, November.
    10. Mark Partridge & Dan Rickman, 2010. "Computable General Equilibrium (CGE) Modelling for Regional Economic Development Analysis," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(10), pages 1311-1328.
    11. Tamas Dusek, 2013. "Two modes of spatial economy models: Thünen and Krugman," ERSA conference papers ersa13p828, European Regional Science Association.
    12. Xavier Ragot, 2017. "Où va l’économie ?," Revue de l'OFCE, Presses de Sciences-Po, vol. 0(4), pages 5-18.
    13. Kim, Ho Yeon, 2012. "Shrinking population and the urban hierarchy," IDE Discussion Papers 360, Institute of Developing Economies, Japan External Trade Organization(JETRO).
    14. Tuan, Chyau & Ng, Linda Fung-Yee, 2007. "The place of FDI in China's regional economic development: Emergence of the globalized delta economies," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 348-364, April.
    15. Norman Sedgley & Bruce Elmslie, 2011. "Do We Still Need Cities? Evidence on Rates of Innovation from Count Data Models of Metropolitan Statistical Area Patents," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 70(1), pages 86-108, January.
    16. Alejandro Diaz-Bautista, 2005. "Agglomeration Economies, Economic Growth and the New Economic Geography in Mexico," Urban/Regional 0508001, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    17. Alan Manning, 2010. "The plant size-place effect: agglomeration and monopsony in labour markets," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 10(5), pages 717-744, September.
    18. Yuan, Huaxi & Feng, Yidai & Lee, Chien-Chiang & Cen, Yan, 2020. "How does manufacturing agglomeration affect green economic efficiency?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    19. Marie Coris & Vincent Frigant & Jean-Bernard Layan & Damien Talbot, 2011. "Les dynamiques spatiales des activités productives," Post-Print hal-02385445, HAL.
    20. Brakman, Steven & Garretsen, Harry & Schramm, Marc, 2001. "New economic geography in Germany: testing the Helpman-Hanson model," Research Report 01D46, University of Groningen, Research Institute SOM (Systems, Organisations and Management).
    21. repec:hal:wpspec:info:hdl:2441/6159 is not listed on IDEAS
    22. Liu, Yazhou & Ren, Tiantian & Liu, Lijun & Ni, Jinlan & Yin, Yingkai, 2023. "Heterogeneous industrial agglomeration, technological innovation and haze pollution," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-02387200. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.