IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/halshs-01479201.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

How to design new representations and to innovate ?
[Comment concevoir de nouvelles représentations et innover ?]

Author

Listed:
  • Gilbert Giacomoni

    (CGS i3 - Centre de Gestion Scientifique i3 - Mines Paris - PSL (École nationale supérieure des mines de Paris) - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - I3 - Institut interdisciplinaire de l’innovation - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, AgroParisTech)

Abstract

Innovation can be defined as a process that stems from the design of an idea, a behavior or a new object, to its acceptance and its widespread application. It could offer stakeholders in a business or more generally in a community, the opportunity to reach Eurêka – the « open sesame of well-being and success. This article focuses on the understanding of the process from the point of view of design science and the science of decision-making. It provides a new conceptual framework designed from theoretical developments and from interventions-based researches done in large well-known established groups as well as in start-ups. Finally, this article concludes on the fundamental mechanisms and the exploratory methodology that should be adopted to design a collective strategy and evaluate human potential.

Suggested Citation

  • Gilbert Giacomoni, 2017. "How to design new representations and to innovate ? [Comment concevoir de nouvelles représentations et innover ?]," Post-Print halshs-01479201, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-01479201
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-01479201
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-01479201/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paul R. Carlile, 2004. "Transferring, Translating, and Transforming: An Integrative Framework for Managing Knowledge Across Boundaries," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 15(5), pages 555-568, October.
    2. Jean-Louis Ermine, 2000. "Les systèmes de connaissances," Grenoble Ecole de Management (Post-Print) hal-00856172, HAL.
    3. Delphine Dion & Lionel Sitz, 2013. "Enrichir la compréhension des comportements de consommation : pistes opérationnelles et enjeux organisationnels," Post-Print hal-02313052, HAL.
    4. repec:dau:papers:123456789/8045 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Jean-Louis Ermine, 2000. "Les systèmes de connaissances," Post-Print hal-00856172, HAL.
    6. Herbert A. Simon, 1996. "The Sciences of the Artificial, 3rd Edition," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262691914, April.
    7. Paul R. Carlile, 2002. "A Pragmatic View of Knowledge and Boundaries: Boundary Objects in New Product Development," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 13(4), pages 442-455, August.
    8. repec:dau:papers:123456789/5485 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Emmanuelle Le Nagard & Fanny Reniou, 2013. "Co-innover avec les clients: entre intérêt et réticence pour les entreprises grand public," Post-Print hal-02386313, HAL.
    10. Cohen, Wesley M & Levinthal, Daniel A, 1989. "Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R&D," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 99(397), pages 569-596, September.
    11. Delphine Dion & Lionel Sitz, 2013. "Enrichir la compréhension des comportements de consommation : pistes opérationnelles et enjeux organisationnels," Post-Print halshs-01892414, HAL.
    12. Sylvie Rolland & Guy Parmentier, 2009. "Les consommateurs des mondes virtuels : construction identitaire et expérience de consommation dans Second Life," Post-Print halshs-00497220, HAL.
    13. Emmanuelle Le Nagard & Fanny Reniou, 2013. "Co-innover avec les clients : entre intérêt et réticence pour les entreprises grand public," Post-Print hal-01322865, HAL.
    14. Gilbert Giacomoni & Jean-Claude Sardas, 2014. "Why Innovative Design Requires New Scientific Foundations for Manageable Identities of Systems," Post-Print halshs-00921700, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gilbert Giacomoni, 2017. "How to design new representations and to innovate ?
      [Comment concevoir de nouvelles représentations et innover ? (]
      ," Working Papers halshs-01479201, HAL.
    2. David A. Broniatowski, 2018. "Building the tower without climbing it: Progress in engineering systems," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(3), pages 259-281, May.
    3. Caccamo, Marta & Pittino, Daniel & Tell, Fredrik, 2023. "Boundary objects, knowledge integration, and innovation management: A systematic review of the literature," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    4. Martinkenaite, Ieva & Breunig, Karl Joachim, 2016. "The emergence of absorptive capacity through micro–macro level interactions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(2), pages 700-708.
    5. Victor P. Seidel & Siobhán O’Mahony, 2014. "Managing the Repertoire: Stories, Metaphors, Prototypes, and Concept Coherence in Product Innovation," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(3), pages 691-712, June.
    6. Daniele T. P. Souza & Eugenia A. Kuhn & Arjen E. J. Wals & Pedro R. Jacobi, 2020. "Learning in, with, and through the Territory: Territory-Based Learning as a Catalyst for Urban Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-19, April.
    7. Swan, Jacky & Goussevskaia, Anna & Newell, Sue & Robertson, Maxine & Bresnen, Mike & Obembe, Ademola, 2007. "Modes of organizing biomedical innovation in the UK and US and the role of integrative and relational capabilities," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(4), pages 529-547, May.
    8. Marco Tortoriello & Ray Reagans & Bill McEvily, 2012. "Bridging the Knowledge Gap: The Influence of Strong Ties, Network Cohesion, and Network Range on the Transfer of Knowledge Between Organizational Units," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 23(4), pages 1024-1039, August.
    9. Maggie Chuoyan Dong & Yulin Fang & Detmar W. Straub, 2017. "The Impact of Institutional Distance on the Joint Performance of Collaborating Firms: The Role of Adaptive Interorganizational Systems," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 28(2), pages 309-331, June.
    10. Burcharth, Ana Luiza Lara de Araújo & Lettl, Christopher & Ulhøi, John Parm, 2015. "Extending organizational antecedents of absorptive capacity: Organizational characteristics that encourage experimentation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 90(PA), pages 269-284.
    11. Hunt, Chris & Bui, Binh & Fowler, Carolyn, 2008. "A Risk-focused Performance Management System Framework for Planning Change in Organisations: New Zealand 'Gentailers' and the ETS," Working Paper Series 4013, Victoria University of Wellington, The New Zealand Institute for the Study of Competition and Regulation.
    12. Anna Jonsson & Maria Grafström & Mikael Klintman, 2022. "Unboxing knowledge in collaboration between academia and society: A story about conceptions and epistemic uncertainty [De-essentializing the Knowledge Intensive Firm: Reflections on Skeptical Resea," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 49(4), pages 583-597.
    13. Sylvain Mbongui-Kialo, 2019. "Contribution de la sociologie de la traduction à la compréhension des difficultés d’intégration du client au sein du processus de co-innovation," Post-Print hal-04397077, HAL.
    14. Siw M. Fosstenløkken, 2019. "The Role Of Plans In The Formation Of A New Innovation Practice: An Innovation Object Perspective," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 23(04), pages 1-23, May.
    15. Moshe Farjoun & Christopher Ansell & Arjen Boin, 2015. "PERSPECTIVE—Pragmatism in Organization Studies: Meeting the Challenges of a Dynamic and Complex World," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(6), pages 1787-1804, December.
    16. Luciana D’Adderio, 2014. "The Replication Dilemma Unravelled: How Organizations Enact Multiple Goals in Routine Transfer," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(5), pages 1325-1350, October.
    17. Mark A. Phillips & Jagjit Singh Srai, 2018. "Exploring Emerging Ecosystem Boundaries: Defining ‘The Game’," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 22(08), pages 1-21, December.
    18. Hilda Bø Lyng & Eric Christian Brun, 2018. "Knowledge Transition: A Conceptual Model of Knowledge Transfer for Cross-Industry Innovation," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 15(05), pages 1-23, October.
    19. Tony Thistoll & Val Hooper & David Pauleen, 2016. "Acquiring and developing theoretical sensitivity through undertaking a grounded preliminary literature review," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 50(2), pages 619-636, March.
    20. Eden, Colin & Ackermann, Fran, 2018. "Theory into practice, practice to theory: Action research in method development," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 271(3), pages 1145-1155.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    innovation processes; knowledge; decision; design; collective strategy;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-01479201. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.