IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/halshs-01306684.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Couplage entre explorations des connaissances scientifiques et des valeurs d’usages : la caractérisation de nouvelles modalités à partir du cas d’une entreprise dans les technologies de la communication

Author

Listed:
  • Florence Charue-Duboc

    (CRG - Centre de recherche en gestion - X - École polytechnique - IP Paris - Institut Polytechnique de Paris - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Lise Gastaldi

    (LEST - Laboratoire d'Economie et de Sociologie du Travail - AMU - Aix Marseille Université - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Thomas Paris

    (GREGH - Groupement de Recherche et d'Etudes en Gestion à HEC - HEC Paris - Ecole des Hautes Etudes Commerciales - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Nathalie Raulet-Croset

    (i3-CRG - Centre de recherche en gestion i3 - X - École polytechnique - IP Paris - Institut Polytechnique de Paris - Université Paris-Saclay - I3 - Institut interdisciplinaire de l’innovation - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, IAE Paris - Sorbonne Business School)

Abstract

Une question cruciale en matière de management de l'innovation technologique est celle du couplage de l'exploration de la valeur associée à une innovation et du développement des savoirs scientifiques et techniques nécessaires à la conception de nouveaux objets, services ou systèmes technologiques. De nombreuses recherches se sont attachées à cette question, caractérisant selon des principes de couplage ou des modalités plus concrètes. Une grande diversité d'approches et de dispositifs a été mise en avant par la littérature, constituant des réponses souvent partielles, du fait de la focalisation fréquente sur un type de modalités de couplage, et parfois contradictoires quant à la manière d'organiser un tel couplage. Dans le contexte actuel de compétition par l'innovation, repère-t-on dans les pratiques empiriques des entreprises technologiques des évolutions par rapport aux modalités de couplage déjà mises en lumière dans la littérature, des combinaisons entre plusieurs modalités, souvent analysées isolément, ou encore le déploiement de nouvelles approches ? Comment ces mécanismes de couplage s'appuient-ils sur des dynamiques individuelles et collectives de compétences ? Tel est le projet poursuivi dans ce travail qui étudie pour ce faire le cas d'une entreprise du secteur des technologies de la communication. Cette entreprise expérimente depuis peu des modalités originales, et combinatoires, en réponse à cette problématique de couplage qui s'avère être particulièrement critique dans un environnement concurrentiel très évolutif.

Suggested Citation

  • Florence Charue-Duboc & Lise Gastaldi & Thomas Paris & Nathalie Raulet-Croset, 2015. "Couplage entre explorations des connaissances scientifiques et des valeurs d’usages : la caractérisation de nouvelles modalités à partir du cas d’une entreprise dans les technologies de la communicati," Post-Print halshs-01306684, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-01306684
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-01306684v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-01306684v1/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pascal Le Masson & Benoit Weil & Armand Hatchuel, 2006. "Les processus d'innovation," Post-Print hal-00830210, HAL.
    2. Remi Maniak & Christophe Midler, 2008. "Shifting from co-development to co-innovation," International Journal of Automotive Technology and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 8(4), pages 449-468.
    3. Gerardine DeSanctis & Marshall Scott Poole, 1994. "Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 5(2), pages 121-147, May.
    4. Sylvain Lenfle, 2008. "Exploration and Project Management," Post-Print hal-00404168, HAL.
    5. Rémi Maniak & Christophe Midler, 2008. "Shifting from co-development process to co-innovation," Post-Print hal-00404179, HAL.
    6. Michael L. Tushman & Ralph Katz, 1980. "External Communication and Project Performance: An Investigation into the Role of Gatekeepers," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(11), pages 1071-1085, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Romaric Servajean-Hilst & Richard Calvi, 2018. "Shades of the Innovation-Purchasing function – the missing link of Open Innovation," Post-Print hal-01700648, HAL.
    2. Toshihiro Wakayama, 2008. "Thematic Networks: Structuring the Organization for Strategic Fit," Working Papers EMS_2008_09, Research Institute, International University of Japan.
    3. Vänninen, Irene & Pereira-Querol, Marco & Engeström, Yrjö, 2015. "Generating transformative agency among horticultural producers: An activity-theoretical approach to transforming Integrated Pest Management," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 38-49.
    4. Toshiro Wakayama, 2006. "Multidimensional Networks: Creating a New Framework of Organization Structure for Complex Strategies," Working Papers EMS_2006_01, Research Institute, International University of Japan.
    5. Florence Charue-Duboc & Lise Gastaldi & Emmanuel Bertin, 2020. "In-house experts communities as a facilitator of innovation [Des communautés d’experts internes comme facilitateur de l’innovation]," Post-Print hal-03059749, HAL.
    6. Abdesamad Zouine & Pierre Fenies, 2014. "The Critical Success Factors Of The ERP System Project: A Meta-Analysis Methodology," Post-Print hal-01419785, HAL.
    7. Mariek Vanden Abeele & Ralf De Wolf & Rich Ling, 2018. "Mobile Media and Social Space: How Anytime, Anyplace Connectivity Structures Everyday Life," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(2), pages 5-14.
    8. Gonzalez, George C. & Sharma, Pratyush N. & Galletta, Dennis F., 2012. "The antecedents of the use of continuous auditing in the internal auditing context," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 13(3), pages 248-262.
    9. Emmanuelle Vaast & Geoff Walsham, 2009. "Trans-Situated Learning: Supporting a Network of Practice with an Information Infrastructure," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 20(4), pages 547-564, December.
    10. Ofir Turel & Catherine E. Connelly, 2012. "Team Spirit: The Influence of Psychological Collectivism on the Usage of E-Collaboration Tools," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 21(5), pages 703-725, September.
    11. Sulin Ba & Jan Stallaert & Andrew B. Whinston, 2001. "Research Commentary: Introducing a Third Dimension in Information Systems Design—The Case for Incentive Alignment," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 12(3), pages 225-239, September.
    12. Tom Broekel & Wladimir Mueller, 2018. "Critical links in knowledge networks – What about proximities and gatekeeper organisations?," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(10), pages 919-939, November.
    13. Ulrike Gretzel & Matthias Fuchs & Rodolfo Baggio & Wolfram Hoepken & Rob Law & Julia Neidhardt & Juho Pesonen & Markus Zanker & Zheng Xiang, 2020. "e-Tourism beyond COVID-19: a call for transformative research," Information Technology & Tourism, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 187-203, June.
    14. Pamela J. Hinds & Diane E. Bailey, 2003. "Out of Sight, Out of Sync: Understanding Conflict in Distributed Teams," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 14(6), pages 615-632, December.
    15. Marco Tortoriello & Ray Reagans & Bill McEvily, 2012. "Bridging the Knowledge Gap: The Influence of Strong Ties, Network Cohesion, and Network Range on the Transfer of Knowledge Between Organizational Units," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 23(4), pages 1024-1039, August.
    16. Ko, Krista K.B. & To, Chester K.M. & Zhang, Z.M. & Ngai, Eric W.T. & Chan, Theresa L.K., 2011. "Analytic collaboration in virtual innovation projects," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 64(12), pages 1327-1334.
    17. Wanda J. Orlikowski & C. Suzanne Iacono, 2001. "Research Commentary: Desperately Seeking the “IT” in IT Research—A Call to Theorizing the IT Artifact," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 12(2), pages 121-134, June.
    18. Knolmayer, Gerhard F., 1988. "Aufgaben und Aufgabenwandel im Information Center," Manuskripte aus den Instituten für Betriebswirtschaftslehre der Universität Kiel 212, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Institut für Betriebswirtschaftslehre.
    19. Frank T. Rothaermel & Maria Tereza Alexandre, 2009. "Ambidexterity in Technology Sourcing: The Moderating Role of Absorptive Capacity," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 20(4), pages 759-780, August.
    20. Christophe Schmitt & Julien Husson, 2014. "La conception : un mécanisme de la pensée entrepreneuriale," Post-Print hal-02999878, HAL.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-01306684. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.