IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/halshs-01053480.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

How to manage a large and flexible nuclear set in a deregulated electricity market from the point of view of social welfare?

Author

Listed:
  • Pascal Gourdel

    (CES - Centre d'économie de la Sorbonne - UP1 - Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, PSE - Paris School of Economics - UP1 - Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne - ENS-PSL - École normale supérieure - Paris - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - EHESS - École des hautes études en sciences sociales - ENPC - École des Ponts ParisTech - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement)

  • Maria Lykidi

    (CES - Centre d'économie de la Sorbonne - UP1 - Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, PSE - Paris School of Economics - UP1 - Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne - ENS-PSL - École normale supérieure - Paris - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - EHESS - École des hautes études en sciences sociales - ENPC - École des Ponts ParisTech - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement)

Abstract

In the case of a large nuclear set (like the French set), nuclear production needs to be flexible to adjust to the predicted evolutions of the energy demmand. Consequently, the dominant position of nuclear in the national energy mix makes it responsible for the overall equilibrium of the electricity system which is directly intertwined with social welfare. In a previous work, we looked at producers own profits (short-term, inter-temporal) considering the equality between supply and demand. Here, we proceed with a full optimization of the social welfare in an identical framework. Theoretically, the optimal production behaviour that maximizes social welfare is characterized by a constant thermal production and a totally flexible nuclear production given that the nuclear capacity is sufficient. Numerically, the significant amount of nuclear capacities compared with thermal capacities in the French electricity market leads to the same "paradoxical" production behaviour. Therefore, we conclude that social optimum is ensured within our model by investing sufficiently in nuclear capacity. The optimal production scheduling determined by the social welfare maximization problem and the optimal inter-temporal production problem are totally opposite.

Suggested Citation

  • Pascal Gourdel & Maria Lykidi, 2014. "How to manage a large and flexible nuclear set in a deregulated electricity market from the point of view of social welfare?," Post-Print halshs-01053480, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-01053480
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-01053480
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-01053480/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pascal Gourdel & Maria Lykidi, 2014. "The optimal short-term management of flexible nuclear plants in a competitive electricity system as a case of competition with reservoir," Post-Print halshs-01053474, HAL.
    2. Lauren Pouret & William J. NUTTALL, 2007. "Can Nuclear Power be Flexible?," Working Papers EPRG 0710, Energy Policy Research Group, Cambridge Judge Business School, University of Cambridge.
    3. Soledad Arellano, 2004. "Market Power in Mixed Hydro-Thermal Electric," Documentos de Trabajo 187, Centro de Economía Aplicada, Universidad de Chile.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pascal Gourdel & Maria Lykidi, 2014. "How to manage a large and flexible nuclear set in a deregulated electricity market from the point of view of social welfare?," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-01053480, HAL.
    2. Pascal Gourdel & Maria Lykidi, 2014. "The optimal short-term management of flexible nuclear plants in a competitive electricity system as a case of competition with reservoir," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-01053474, HAL.
    3. Pascal Gourdel & Maria Lykidi, 2014. "The inter-temporal optimization of the operation of the nuclear fuel reservoir in a liberalized electricity market dominated by the nuclear generation," Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne 14058, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne.
    4. Lykidi, Maria & Gourdel, Pascal, 2017. "Optimal management of flexible nuclear power plants in a decarbonising competitive electricity market: The French case," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 171-185.
    5. Lykidi, Maria & Gourdel, Pascal, 2015. "How to manage flexible nuclear power plants in a deregulated electricity market from the point of view of social welfare?," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 167-180.
    6. Pascal Gourdel & Maria Lykidi, 2014. "How to manage a large and flexible nuclear set in a deregulated electricity market from the point of view of social welfare?," Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne 14059, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne.
    7. repec:hal:pseose:halshs-01053480 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Pascal Gourdel & Maria Lykidi, 2014. "The inter-temporal optimization of the operation of the nuclear fuel reservoir in a liberalized electricity market dominated by the nuclear generation," Post-Print halshs-01053476, HAL.
    9. Pascal Gourdel & Maria Lykidi, 2014. "The optimal short-term management of flexible nuclear plants in a competitive electricity system as a case of competition with reservoir," Post-Print halshs-01053474, HAL.
    10. Alhadhrami, Saeed & Soto, Gabriel J & Lindley, Ben, 2023. "Dispatch analysis of flexible power operation with multi-unit small modular reactors," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 280(C).
    11. Maria Lykidi & Jean-Michel Glachant & Pascal Gourdel, 2010. "Modeling the effects of nuclear fuel reservoir operation in a competitive electricity market," Post-Print halshs-00543286, HAL.
    12. Alexander Galetovic & Juan Ricardo Inostroza & Cristián Marcelo Muñoz, 2004. "Gas y Electricidad: ¿qué hacer ahora? (Gas and electricity: What should we do now?)," Documentos de Trabajo 198, Centro de Economía Aplicada, Universidad de Chile.
    13. M. Soledad Arellano & Pablo Serra, 2005. "Market Power in Price-Regulated Power Industries," Documentos de Trabajo 208, Centro de Economía Aplicada, Universidad de Chile.
    14. Russell Pittman & Vanessa Yanhua Zhang, 2010. "Electricity Restructuring In China: How Competitive Will Generation Markets Be?," The Singapore Economic Review (SER), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 55(02), pages 377-400.
    15. Pittman, Russell, 2007. "Restructuring the Russian electricity sector: Re-creating California?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 1872-1883, March.
    16. Billette de Villemeur, Etienne & Vinella, Annalisa, 2011. "Long-term contracting in hydro-thermal electricity generation: Welfare and environmental impact," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 19(1), pages 20-32, January.
    17. Francisco Caravia & Eduardo Saavedra, 2005. "Subastando la Energía para Clientes Regulados: Un Análisis de Equilibrio," ILADES-UAH Working Papers inv169, Universidad Alberto Hurtado/School of Economics and Business.
    18. Reus, Lorenzo & Munoz, Francisco D. & Moreno, Rodrigo, 2018. "Retail consumers and risk in centralized energy auctions for indexed long-term contracts in Chile," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 566-577.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    electricity power; nuclear power plant; flexibility; nuclear fuel stock; thermal generation; social welfare; total cost minimization;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-01053480. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.