IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/halshs-00618321.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Concertation et incitations efficaces, deux objectifs incompatibles ? Une analyse à partir du dispositif de gestion des déchets d'emballages ménagers en France

Author

Listed:
  • Olivier Godard

    (LMD - Laboratoire de Météorologie Dynamique (UMR 8539) - UPMC - Université Pierre et Marie Curie - Paris 6 - INSU - CNRS - Institut national des sciences de l'Univers - X - École polytechnique - IP Paris - Institut Polytechnique de Paris - ENPC - École des Ponts ParisTech - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - Département des Géosciences - ENS Paris - ENS-PSL - École normale supérieure - Paris - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres, CIRED - centre international de recherche sur l'environnement et le développement - Cirad - Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement - EHESS - École des hautes études en sciences sociales - AgroParisTech - ENPC - École des Ponts ParisTech - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

Abstract

Certaines politiques publiques contemporaines sont apparemment exposées à un double bind : devoir être fondées sur une large concertation des autorités publiques avec les agents soumis à la régulation et sur les démarches volontaires de ces derniers ; devoir être économiquement efficaces. En effet, lorsque ces politiques sont conçues sur la base des meilleurs conseils des économistes pour rechercher l'efficacité économique, en misant notamment sur des instruments incitatifs comme les taxes, elles sont jugées inacceptables par l'industrie et les autres agents concernés (municipalités, consommateurs) et se trouvent écartées avant même de pouvoir être expérimentées, ou sont appliquées dans des conditions qui en pervertissent le sens. Lorsqu'à l'inverse elles sont fondées sur la concertation et le partenariat, les politiques retenues semblent manquer de façon non contingente des incitations appropriées pour mener les agents à l'efficacité économique collective. L'interprétation proposée attire l'attention sur les conditions initiales à réunir pour que s'engagent des comportements coopératifs et se créent les conditions d'une action commune entre des entreprises par ailleurs rivales : la non interférence avec les positions économiques ex ante.

Suggested Citation

  • Olivier Godard, 1998. "Concertation et incitations efficaces, deux objectifs incompatibles ? Une analyse à partir du dispositif de gestion des déchets d'emballages ménagers en France," Post-Print halshs-00618321, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00618321
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-00618321
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-00618321/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Christophe Defeuilley & Philippe Quirion, 1995. "Les déchets d'emballages ménagers : une analyse économique des politiques allemande et française," Économie et Statistique, Programme National Persée, vol. 290(1), pages 69-79.
    2. Arthur, W Brian, 1989. "Competing Technologies, Increasing Returns, and Lock-In by Historical Events," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 99(394), pages 116-131, March.
    3. Olivier Godard, 1997. "Social Decision-Making under Scientific Controversy, Expertise, and the Precautionary Principle," Post-Print halshs-00624027, HAL.
    4. R. H. Coase, 2013. "The Problem of Social Cost," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 56(4), pages 837-877.
    5. Matthieu Glachant, 1994. "The setting of voluntary agreements between industry and government: Bargaining and efficiency," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 3(2), pages 43-49.
    6. Christophe Defeuilley & Olivier Godard, 1998. "La nouvelle politique de gestion des déchets d'emballages. Quand concertation et décentralisation ne riment pas avec incitation," Post-Print hal-00622843, HAL.
    7. Olivier Godard & Olivier Beaumais, 1993. "Économie, croissance et environnement. De nouvelles stratégies pour de nouvelles relations," Revue Économique, Programme National Persée, vol. 44(1), pages 143-176.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Aggeri, Franck, 1999. "Environmental policies and innovation: A knowledge-based perspective on cooperative approaches," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 28(7), pages 699-717, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Roger R. Betancourt, 1991. "The New Institutional Economics and the Study of the Cuban Economy," Annual Proceedings, The Association for the Study of the Cuban Economy, vol. 1.
    2. S. J. Liebowitz & Stephen E. Margolis, 1994. "Network Externality: An Uncommon Tragedy," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 8(2), pages 133-150, Spring.
    3. Steenge, Albert E., 1999. "Input-output theory and institutional aspects of environmental policy," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 10(1), pages 161-176, January.
    4. Carayannis, Elias G. & Vincenzi, Marco & Draper, John, 2024. "The economic logic of open science in fusion energy research: A policy perspective," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    5. Stolpe, Michael, 1995. "Technology and the dynamics of specialization in open economies," Open Access Publications from Kiel Institute for the World Economy 738, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    6. Altug Yalcintas, 2013. "The Problem of Epistemic Cost: Why Do Economists Not Change Their Minds (About the “Coase Theorem”)?," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 72(5), pages 1131-1157, November.
    7. Eggertsson, Thrainn, 1997. "The old theory of economic policy and the new institutionalism," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 25(8), pages 1187-1203, August.
    8. Nilsson, Mats, 2007. "Red light for Green Paper: The EU policy on energy efficiency," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 540-547, January.
    9. Joël Houdet & Michel Trommetter & Jacques Weber, 2009. "Changing business perceptions regarding biodiversity: from impact mitigation towards new strategies and practices," Working Papers hal-00412875, HAL.
    10. Sonderegger, Petra & Täube, Florian, 2010. "Cluster life cycle and diaspora effects: Evidence from the Indian IT cluster in Bangalore," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 16(4), pages 383-397, December.
    11. Garud, Raghu & Gehman, Joel, 2012. "Metatheoretical perspectives on sustainability journeys: Evolutionary, relational and durational," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(6), pages 980-995.
    12. Chenhao Fang & Tieju Ma, 2021. "Technology adoption with carbon emission trading mechanism: modeling with heterogeneous agents and uncertain carbon price," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 300(2), pages 577-600, May.
    13. Olivier Godard, 1998. "On markets and the conditions of a profitable use of economic instruments for environmental policy in countries in transition to market," Post-Print halshs-00624095, HAL.
    14. Nicholas Howarth, 2011. "Clean Energy Technology and the Role of Non-Carbon Price-Based Policy: An Evolutionary Economics Perspective," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(5), pages 871-891, October.
    15. Federico Frattini, 2011. "Mature Systems in Global Markets: The Need for an Institutional Division of Labour," Working Papers 201109, University of Ferrara, Department of Economics.
    16. Leo Wangler, 2010. "Renewables and Innovation - Empirical Assessment and Theoretical Considerations," Jena Economics Research Papers 2010-002, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena.
    17. Emanuela Randon, 2002. "L’analisi positiva dell’esternalità: rassegna della letteratura e nuovi spunti," Working Papers 58, University of Milano-Bicocca, Department of Economics, revised Jun 2002.
    18. Jeroen Bergh, 2007. "Evolutionary thinking in environmental economics," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 17(5), pages 521-549, October.
    19. Philip Auerswald, 2008. "Entrepreneurship in the Theory of the Firm," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 30(2), pages 111-126, February.
    20. Olivier Godard & Christophe Defeuilley, 1997. "The Economics of Recycling In France: Institutional Framework And Technological Adoption," Post-Print halshs-00624087, HAL.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    politiques publiques; environnement;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00618321. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.