IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/halshs-00525992.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Déterminants et pertinence de l'activation des dépenses de recherche & développement dans le contexte des entreprises françaises

Author

Listed:
  • Salma Loulou

    (Institut Supérieur de Comptabilité et d'Administration des entreprises - UMA - Université de la Manouba [Tunisie])

  • Mohamed Triki

    (ESC - FSS - Faculté des Sciences de Sfax - Université de Sfax - University of Sfax)

Abstract

L'objectif de cet article est double. Il s'agit tout d'abord d'identifier les facteurs explicatifs qui poussent les entreprises à opter pour l'activation des dépenses de recherche & développement1 (R&D) et d'examiner ensuite la pertinence du signal émis par de telle décision comptable pour les investisseurs. Les résultats montrent que l'activation constitue un outil privilégié dont disposent les dirigeants d'entreprises non plus pour signaler aux investisseurs les perspectives futures de leurs programmes de R&D, mais pour répondre de façon opportuniste à des enjeux contractuels dans le but de minimiser les coûts politiques ou encore pour lisser les résultats comptables. De plus, ces mêmes résultats indiquent que les entreprises françaises dont l'intensité de R&D est élevée ont tendance à passer les dites dépenses en charges en préférant la stratégie de communication sur la R&D à l'activation.

Suggested Citation

  • Salma Loulou & Mohamed Triki, 2008. "Déterminants et pertinence de l'activation des dépenses de recherche & développement dans le contexte des entreprises françaises," Post-Print halshs-00525992, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00525992
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-00525992
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-00525992/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Daley, Lane A. & Vigeland, Robert L., 1983. "The effects of debt covenants and political costs on the choice of accounting methods : The case of accounting for R&D costs," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 5(1), pages 195-211, April.
    2. Aboody, D & Lev, B, 1998. "The value relevance of intangibles: The case of software capitalization," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36, pages 161-191.
    3. Yuan Ding & Hervé Stolowy & Michel Tenenhaus, 2003. "R&D productivity: an international study," Working Papers hal-00591685, HAL.
    4. Marta Ballester & Manuel Garcia-Ayuso & Joshua Livnat, 2003. "The economic value of the R&D intangible asset," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(4), pages 605-633.
    5. Ely, K & Waymire, G, 1999. "Intangible assets and stock prices in the pre-SEC era," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37, pages 17-44.
    6. John S. Hughes & Jennifer L. Kao, 1991. "Economic implications of alternative disclosure rules for research and development costs," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 8(1), pages 152-169, September.
    7. Jayne Godfrey & Ping-Sheng Koh, 2001. "The Relevance to Firm Valuation of Capitalising Intangible Assets in Total and by Category," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 11(24), pages 39-48, July.
    8. Feliana Yie Ke & Tam Pham & Neil Fargher, 2004. "The Relevance to Firm Valuation of Capitalised Research and Development Expenditures," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 14(34), pages 72-76, November.
    9. Yuan Ding & Hervé Stolowy, 2003. "" Capitalisation " Des Frais De R&D En France : Determinants Et Pertinence," Post-Print halshs-00582768, HAL.
    10. Cazavan-Jeny , Anne & Jeanjean, Thomas, 2003. "Value Relevance of R&D Reporting : A Signaling Interpretation," ESSEC Working Papers DR 03021, ESSEC Research Center, ESSEC Business School.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rihab Guidara & Younes Boujelbene, 2014. "R&D-Based Earnings Management and Accounting Performance Motivation," International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, vol. 4(2), pages 81-93, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shawn Ho & Baljit K. Sidhu & Fan Yang, 2023. "The response of Australian firms to AASB 138 disallowing the recognition of internally generated identifiable intangibles," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 63(3), pages 3609-3641, September.
    2. Lorena Mitrione & George Tanewski & Jacqueline Birt, 2014. "The relevance to firm valuation of research and development expenditure in the Australian health-care industry," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 39(3), pages 425-452, August.
    3. Cho, Joe (Joonghi) & Kim, Heejung, 2024. "Does a consistently capitalized R&D ratio improve information effects of capitalized development expenditures?," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    4. Dennis Oswald & Paul Zarowin, 2007. "Capitalization of R&D and the Informativeness of Stock Prices," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(4), pages 703-726.
    5. Anis Jarboui & Ahmed Abdelmoula, 2007. "Opportunisme Managerial, Valorisation Boursiere Et Modes De Comptabilisation Des Depenses Immaterielles Dans Les Pays Emergents," Post-Print halshs-00522296, HAL.
    6. Keryn Chalmers & Greg Clinch & Jayne M. Godfrey, 2008. "Adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards: Impact on the Value Relevance of Intangible Assets," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 18(3), pages 237-247, September.
    7. Hédi Turki & Ahmed Abdelmoula, 2007. "Les Determinants Des Choix Comptables Relatifs Aux Elements Immateriels Cas Des Entreprises Tunisiennes," Post-Print halshs-00544910, HAL.
    8. Atoche, Teresa duarte & Pérez lópez, José ángel & Camúñez ruiz, Jose antonio, 2012. "La relevancia de los gastos de I+D. Estudio empírico en el sector del automóvil," Revista de Contabilidad - Spanish Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 15(2), pages 257-286.
    9. Constant Djama & Guillaume Dumas & Isabelle Martinez, 2011. "L'innovation : une incitation à la gestion des résultats ?," Post-Print hal-00650418, HAL.
    10. Thomas Jeanjean & Anne Cazavan-Jeny, 2003. "Value relevance of R&D reporting: a signalling interpretation," Working Papers hal-00592028, HAL.
    11. Warren Maroun & Wayne van Zijl & Rottok Chesaina & Robert Garnett, 2022. "The Beautiful Game: Fair Value, Accountability and Accounting for Player Registrations," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 32(3), pages 334-351, September.
    12. Samah Rebai Azouz, 2013. "Gouvernement D'Entreprise Et Choix Du Mode De Comptabilisation Des Investissements En R&D : Cas Des Entreprises Françaises Cotées," Post-Print hal-00996788, HAL.
    13. Tami Dinh Thi & Wolfgang Schultze, 2011. "Capitalizing research & development and ‘other information’: the incremental information content of accruals versus cash flows," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 241-278, November.
    14. Namryoung Lee, 2018. "R&D Accounting Treatment, R&D State and Tax Avoidance: With a Focus on Biotech Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-12, December.
    15. Yasean A. Tahat & Ahmed H. Ahmed & Mohammad M. Alhadab, 2018. "The impact of intangibles on firms’ financial and market performance: UK evidence," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 50(4), pages 1147-1168, May.
    16. Adam Ritter & Peter Wells, 2006. "Identifiable intangible asset disclosures, stock prices and future earnings," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 46(5), pages 843-863, December.
    17. Dahmash, Firas N. & Durand, Robert B. & Watson, John, 2009. "The value relevance and reliability of reported goodwill and identifiable intangible assets," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 120-137.
    18. Brettschneider, Carina, 2019. "R&D Accounting Discretion as an Income Smoothing Tool: An Empirical Analysis of German Listed Companies," Junior Management Science (JUMS), Junior Management Science e. V., vol. 4(2), pages 151-172.
    19. Rihab Guidara & Younes Boujelbene, 2014. "R&D-Based Earnings Management and Accounting Performance Motivation," International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, vol. 4(2), pages 81-93, April.
    20. F. Tsoligkas & I. Tsalavoutas, 2011. "Value relevance of R&D in the UK after IFRS mandatory implementation," Applied Financial Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(13), pages 957-967.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00525992. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.