IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-04890497.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

L'influence de la légitimité sur la dynamique des écosystèmes entrepreneuriaux : cas de l'écosystème entrepreneurial de la Métropole Aix-Marseille Provence

Author

Listed:
  • Leslie Maillot

    (CERGAM - Centre d'Études et de Recherche en Gestion d'Aix-Marseille - AMU - Aix Marseille Université - UTLN - Université de Toulon)

Abstract

Cette recherche a pour objet de mieux comprendre comment se construit la légitimité des écosystèmes entrepreneuriaux à travers celle de ses acteurs. Nous chercherons à répondre à la question suivante: Comment les acteurs aux logiques hétérogènes et parfois conflictuelles au sein de l'EE s'évaluent, se choisissent et se mobilisent dans le temps pour accompagner et favoriser l'entrepreneuriat ? Depuis une dizaine d'années, la recherche s'est emparée du concept d'écosystème entrepreneurial (EE). Les EE embrassent un ensemble d'acteurs et de facteurs interdépendants, coordonnés pour favoriser et accompagner l'entrepreneuriat, sur un territoire donné (Stam, 2015). En dépit d'une littérature de plus en plus abondante sur les EE, les mécanismes relationnels individuels qui nourrissent leur dynamique restent encore incompris (Wurth et al., 2022). Afin de mieux se saisir de cet aspect dynamique, à l'échelle micro, nous nous appuierons sur le concept de la légitimité, ancré dans une perspective néo-institutionnelle. La légitimité d'un EE repose sur les normes, règles et valeurs impulsées par son environnement et est également dépendante des parties-prenantes qui l'évaluent (Deephouse et al., 2017) et le composent. L'approche par la théorie néo-institutionnelle nous permet de comprendre comment les acteurs par leurs interactions réciproques et leurs actions quotidiennes influencent leur environnement et peuvent contribuer à la création de nouvelles normes sociales (Owen-Smith & Powell, 2008). Afin de répondre à notre problématique, nous avons ainsi construit une grille d'entretien semidirectif. Une étude qualitative exploratoire sur le territoire métropolitain Aix-Marseille Provence est en cours pour nous permettre de comprendre les spécificités de l'EE et de ses acteurs.

Suggested Citation

  • Leslie Maillot, 2024. "L'influence de la légitimité sur la dynamique des écosystèmes entrepreneuriaux : cas de l'écosystème entrepreneurial de la Métropole Aix-Marseille Provence," Post-Print hal-04890497, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04890497
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://amu.hal.science/hal-04890497v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://amu.hal.science/hal-04890497v1/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Erik Stam, 2015. "Entrepreneurial Ecosystems and Regional Policy: A Sympathetic Critique," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(9), pages 1759-1769, September.
    2. Bernd Wurth & Erik Stam & Ben Spigel, 2022. "Toward an Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Research Program," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 46(3), pages 729-778, May.
    3. Magali Ayache & Hervé Dumez, 2011. "Le codage dans la recherche qualitative une nouvelle perspective ?," Post-Print hal-00657490, HAL.
    4. Alessandra Colombelli & Emilio Paolucci & Elisa Ughetto, 2019. "Hierarchical and relational governance and the life cycle of entrepreneurial ecosystems," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 52(2), pages 505-521, February.
    5. Fligstein, Neil, 2001. "Social Skill and the Theory of Fields," Center for Culture, Organizations and Politics, Working Paper Series qt26m187b1, Center for Culture, Organizations and Politics of theInstitute for Research on Labor and Employment, UC Berkeley.
    6. Stephanie Chasserio & Typhaine Lebègue & Corinne Poroli & Philippe Pailot, 2022. "Diffusion des logiques institutionnelles au sein des écosystèmes entrepreneuriaux. Le rôle clé des organismes d’accompagnement," Revue française de gestion, Lavoisier, vol. 0(1), pages 33-59.
    7. Stéphanie Chasserio & Typhaine Lebègue & Philippe Pailot & Corinne Poroli, 2022. "Diffusion des logiques institutionnelles au sein des écosystèmes entrepreneuriaux : le rôle clé des organismes d’accompagnement," Post-Print hal-03510002, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marquardt, Leon & Harima, Aki, 2024. "Digital boundary spanning in the evolution of entrepreneurial ecosystems: A dynamic capabilities perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    2. Andrea Ancona & Matteo Cinelli & Giovanna Ferraro & Antonio Iovanella, 2023. "Network-based principles of entrepreneurial ecosystems: a case study of a start-up network," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 61(4), pages 1497-1514, December.
    3. Haifeng Qian & Zoltan J. Acs, 2023. "Entrepreneurial Ecosystems and Economic Development Policy," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 37(1), pages 96-102, February.
    4. Baldwin, Carliss Y. & Bogers, Marcel L.A.M. & Kapoor, Rahul & West, Joel, 2024. "Focusing the ecosystem lens on innovation studies," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(3).
    5. Christina Theodoraki & Alexis Catanzaro, 2022. "Widening the borders of entrepreneurial ecosystem through the international lens," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 47(2), pages 383-406, April.
    6. Mariana Pita & Joana Costa & António Carrizo Moreira, 2021. "Entrepreneurial Ecosystems and Entrepreneurial Initiative: Building a Multi-Country Taxonomy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-26, April.
    7. Nasser Al‐Baimani & Nick Clifton & Eleri Jones & Rhiannon Pugh, 2021. "Applying the ecosystem model in a new context? The case of business incubation in Oman," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(2), pages 663-686, June.
    8. Rocha, Augusto & Brown, Ross & Mawson, Suzanne, 2021. "Capturing conversations in entrepreneurial ecosystems," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(9).
    9. Reis, Germano Glufke & Villar, Eduardo Guedes & Prado Gimenez, Fernando Antonio & Maiolino Molento, Carla Forte & Ferri, Priscila, 2022. "The interplay of entrepreneurial ecosystems and global value chains: Insights from the cultivated meat entrepreneurial ecosystem of Singapore," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    10. Magnus Henrekson & Dan Johansson & Johan Karlsson, 2024. "To Be or Not to Be: The Entrepreneur in Neo-Schumpeterian Growth Theory," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 48(1), pages 104-140, January.
    11. Lee, Kyootai & Jung, Hyun Ju, 2024. "What makes universities build academic spin-offs more successfully? A theory-based triangulation of quantitative studies based on meta-analyses," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 21(C).
    12. Aki Harima & Jan Harima & Jörg Freiling, 2024. "Ecosystem Orchestration: Unpacking the Leadership Capabilities of Anchor Organizations in Nascent Entrepreneurial Ecosystems," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 48(6), pages 1404-1450, November.
    13. Luiza Ossowska & Dorota Janiszewska & Grzegorz Kwiatkowski, 2023. "The Entrepreneurship Ecosystem of Food Festivals—A Vendors’ Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-19, January.
    14. Colin Donaldson, 2021. "Culture in the entrepreneurial ecosystem: a conceptual framing," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 289-319, March.
    15. Pindado, Emilio & Sánchez, Mercedes & García Martínez, Marian, 2023. "Entrepreneurial innovativeness: When too little or too much agglomeration hurts," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(1).
    16. Fossen, Frank M. & McLemore, Trevor & Sorgner, Alina, 2024. "Artificial Intelligence and Entrepreneurship," IZA Discussion Papers 17055, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    17. Laurence Cloutier & Karim Messeghem, 2022. "Whirlwind model of entrepreneurial ecosystem path dependence," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 59(2), pages 611-625, August.
    18. James J. Chrisman & Donald O. Neubaum & Friederike Welter & Karl Wennberg, 2022. "Knowledge Accumulation in Entrepreneurship," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 46(3), pages 479-496, May.
    19. Daniel Sunghwan Cho & Paul Ryan & Giulio Buciuni, 2022. "Evolutionary entrepreneurial ecosystems: a research pathway," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 58(4), pages 1865-1883, April.
    20. Roundy, Philip T. & Randy Evans, W., 2024. "Entrepreneurial ecosystems as multiteam systems: Navigating independence and interdependence in the leadership of startup communities," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 21(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04890497. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.