IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-04773956.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Socio-economic inequalities in the use of flu vaccination in Europe: a multilevel approach

Author

Listed:
  • Dănuț-Vasile Jemna

    (UAIC - Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iași = Universitatea Alexandru Ioan Cuza din Iași)

  • Mihaela David

    (UAIC - Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iași = Universitatea Alexandru Ioan Cuza din Iași)

  • Liliane Bonnal

    (LéP [Poitiers] - Laboratoire d'économie de Poitiers - UP - Université de Poitiers = University of Poitiers)

  • Cornel Oros

    (LéP [Poitiers] - Laboratoire d'économie de Poitiers - UP - Université de Poitiers = University of Poitiers)

Abstract

Background The European-wide statistics show that the use of flu vaccination remains low and the differences between countries are significant, as are those between different population groups within each country. Considerable research has focused on explaining vaccination uptake in relation to socio-economic and demographic characteristics, health promotion and health behavior factors. Nevertheless, few studies have aimed to analyze between-country differences in the use of flu vaccination for the EU population. To address this gap, this study examines the socio-economic inequalities in the use of influenza vaccination for the population aged 15 years and over in all 27 EU Member States and two other non-EU countries (Iceland and Norway). Methods Using data from the third wave of European Health Interview Survey (EHIS) 2019, we employed a multilevel logistic model with a random intercept for country, which allows controlling simultaneously the variations in individuals' characteristics and macro-contextual factors which could influence the use of flu vaccination. In addition, the analysis considers the population stratified into four age groups, namely adolescents, young adults, adults and elderly, to better capture heterogeneities in flu vaccination uptake. Results The main findings confirm the existence of socio-economic inequalities between individuals in different age groups, but also of significant variation between European countries, particularly for older people, in the use of influenza vaccination. In this respect, income and education are strong proxy of socio-economic status associated with flu vaccination uptake. Moreover, these disparities within each population group are also explained by area of residence and occupational status. Particularly for the elderly, the differences between individuals in vaccine utilization are also explained by country-level factors, such as the type of healthcare system adopted in each country, public funding, personal health expenditure burden, or the availability of generalist practitioners. Conclusions Overall, our findings reveal that vaccination against seasonal influenza remains a critical public health intervention and bring attention to the relevance of conceiving and implementing context-specific strategies to ensure equitable access to vaccines for all EU citizens.

Suggested Citation

  • Dănuț-Vasile Jemna & Mihaela David & Liliane Bonnal & Cornel Oros, 2024. "Socio-economic inequalities in the use of flu vaccination in Europe: a multilevel approach," Post-Print hal-04773956, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04773956
    DOI: 10.1186/s13561-024-00535-1
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-04773956v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-04773956v1/document
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1186/s13561-024-00535-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chad D. Meyerhoefer & Samuel H. Zuvekas & Bita Fayaz Farkhad & John F. Moeller & Richard J. Manski, 2019. "The demand for preventive and restorative dental services among older adults," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(9), pages 1151-1158, September.
    2. G. Miller & Yuriy Pylypchuk, 2014. "Marital Status, Spousal Characteristics, and the Use of Preventive Care," Journal of Family and Economic Issues, Springer, vol. 35(3), pages 323-338, September.
    3. Terraneo, Marco, 2015. "Inequities in health care utilization by people aged 50+: Evidence from 12 European countries," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 154-163.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dănuț-Vasile Jemna & Mihaela David & Liliane Bonnal & Cornel Oros, 2024. "Socio-economic inequalities in the use of flu vaccination in Europe: a multilevel approach," Health Economics Review, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 1-20, December.
    2. dos Santos, Anderson Moreira Aristides & Triaca, Lívia Madeira & Tejada, Cesar Augusto Oviedo, 2021. "Evolution of inequalities in health care use among older people in Brazil: Evidence for the period 1998–2019," The Journal of the Economics of Ageing, Elsevier, vol. 20(C).
    3. Chen, Yuanyuan & Wang, Haining & Cheng, Zhiming & Smyth, Russell, 2023. "Education and Migrant Health in China," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    4. Alisson Fernandes Bolina & Nayara Cândida Gomes & Gianna Fiori Marchiori & Maycon Sousa Pegorari & Darlene Mara dos Santos Tavares, 2019. "Potentially inappropriate medication use and frailty phenotype among community‐dwelling older adults: A population‐based study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(21-22), pages 3914-3922, November.
    5. Wolfgang Frimmel & Felix Glaser, 2024. "Socio-Economic Inequality in Mortality and Healthcare Utilization: Evidence from Cancer Patients," Economics working papers 2024-14, Department of Economics, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Austria.
    6. Denzil G. Fiebig & Kees van Gool & Jane Hall & Chunzhou Mu, 2021. "Health care use in response to health shocks: Does socio‐economic status matter?," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(12), pages 3032-3050, December.
    7. David Cantarero-Prieto & Marta Pascual-Sáez & Carla Blázquez-Fernández, 2021. "Does Social Isolation Affect Medical Doctor Visits? New Evidence Among European Older Adults," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 16(2), pages 787-804, April.
    8. Davillas, Apostolos & Pudney, Stephen, 2020. "Biomarkers, disability and health care demand," Economics & Human Biology, Elsevier, vol. 39(C).
    9. Sabah T Alharbi & Muneeb M Alzghool, 2019. "Factors Associated With Access, Utilization, and Level of Satisfaction With Primary Health Care Services in Hafar Al-batain City of Saudi Arabia," Global Journal of Health Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(13), pages 1-34, December.
    10. Raskina, Yulia & Podkorytova, Olga & Kuchakov, Ruslan, 2022. "Health determinants and the reporting heterogeneity bias in Russia: Anchoring vignettes approach," Applied Econometrics, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA), vol. 66, pages 118-143.
    11. Chaofan Li & Lei Dou & Haipeng Wang & Shanshan Jing & Aitian Yin, 2017. "Horizontal Inequity in Health Care Utilization among the Middle-Aged and Elderly in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-13, July.
    12. Thomson, Michael, 2019. "Who had access to doctors before and after new universal capitated subsidies in New Zealand?," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(8), pages 756-764.
    13. Aimée Hartford Kvæl, Linda & Gautun, Heidi, 2023. "Social inequality in navigating the healthcare maze: Care trajectories from hospital to home via intermediate care for older people in Norway," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 333(C).
    14. Kamyar Nasseh & John R. Bowblis, 2022. "The effect on dental care utilization from transitioning pediatric Medicaid beneficiaries to managed care," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(6), pages 1103-1128, June.
    15. Pamela Barbadoro & Antonella D’Alleva & Sara Galmozzi & Gemma Zocco & Francesco Di Stanislao & Emilia Prospero & Marcello Mario D’Errico, 2018. "Variations in diagnostic testing utilization in Italy: Secondary analysis of a national survey," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(6), pages 1-13, June.
    16. Sarti, Simone & Terraneo, Marco & Tognetti Bordogna, Mara, 2017. "Poverty and private health expenditures in Italian households during the recent crisis," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 121(3), pages 307-314.
    17. Joy Agner & Katharine Elizabeth Bau & Dirk Bruland, 2024. "An Introduction to Health Literacy and Social Contexts with Recommendations for Health Professionals and Researchers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(2), pages 1-14, February.
    18. Chen, Fengming & Wakabayashi, Midori & Yuda, Michio, 2024. "The impact of retirement on health: Empirical evidence from the change in public pensionable age in Japan," The Journal of the Economics of Ageing, Elsevier, vol. 28(C).
    19. David Cantarero-Prieto & Marta Pascual-Sáez & Carla Blázquez-Fernández, 2018. "Does social isolation affect medical doctor visits? New evidence among European older adults," Working Papers. Collection B: Regional and sectoral economics 1805, Universidade de Vigo, GEN - Governance and Economics research Network.
    20. Thomas Leoni & Martin Spielauer & Peter Reschenhofer, 2020. "Soziale Unterschiede, Lebenserwartung und Gesundheitsausgaben im Lebensverlauf," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 66626, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04773956. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.