IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-04734348.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Blockchain technology adoption in the insurance industry: a conceptual framework

Author

Listed:
  • Débora Allam-Firley

    (CREDDI - Centre de Recherche en Economie et en Droit du Développement Insulaire [UR7_2] - UA - Université des Antilles)

  • Elsa Corbin

    (MEMIAD - Management, économie, modélisation, informatique et aide à la décision [UR7_3] - UA - Université des Antilles)

Abstract

The use of new technologies and ubiquitous digitalization have resulted in major changes in customer expectations. The 2019 coronavirus disease crisis has accelerated the need for digital transformation in many industries, including insurance. Insurance organizations recognizing the dynamic changes that are transforming the insurance sector are taking action to gain new competitive advantage by introducing blockchain technology. This technology helps companies to be more customer oriented, improve their offerings, and increase their operational efficiency by enhancing their traditional value chains. The literature on blockchain technology use in the insurance industry has focused on technological aspects, and little is known about the factors underlying the adoption of this technology, which is critical for success. This paper introduces a theoretical model based on the universal theory of acceptance and use of technology for the identification of aspects that can facilitate or hinder blockchain technology adoption in the insurance industry, with the ultimate aim of promoting the successful diffusion of this technology in this sector. This paper contributes to the understanding of insurance employees' perspectives onblockchain technology adoption in their daily work. It identifies aspects of user behaviour that practitioners should consider while developing strategies for blockchain technology implementation in their business processes. The proposed model is conceptual and has not been empirically tested; such research is needed.

Suggested Citation

  • Débora Allam-Firley & Elsa Corbin, 2023. "Blockchain technology adoption in the insurance industry: a conceptual framework," Post-Print hal-04734348, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04734348
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.univ-antilles.fr/hal-04734348v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.univ-antilles.fr/hal-04734348v1/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hamed Taherdoost, 2018. "Development of an adoption model to assess user acceptance of e-service technology: E-Service Technology Acceptance Model," Behaviour and Information Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(2), pages 173-197, February.
    2. Howells, Jeremy, 2006. "Intermediation and the role of intermediaries in innovation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(5), pages 715-728, June.
    3. Emanuel Stoeckli & Christian Dremel & Falk Uebernickel, 2018. "Exploring characteristics and transformational capabilities of InsurTech innovations to understand insurance value creation in a digital world," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 28(3), pages 287-305, August.
    4. Likoebe M. Maruping & Hillol Bala & Viswanath Venkatesh & Susan A. Brown, 2017. "Going beyond intention: Integrating behavioral expectation into the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 68(3), pages 623-637, March.
    5. Gault, Fred, 2018. "Defining and measuring innovation in all sectors of the economy," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(3), pages 617-622.
    6. Hughes, Laurie & Dwivedi, Yogesh K. & Misra, Santosh K. & Rana, Nripendra P. & Raghavan, Vishnupriya & Akella, Viswanadh, 2019. "Blockchain research, practice and policy: Applications, benefits, limitations, emerging research themes and research agenda," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 114-129.
    7. Marja Toivonen & Tiina Tuominen, 2009. "Emergence of innovations in services," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(7), pages 887-902, July.
    8. Castellacci, Fulvio, 2008. "Technological paradigms, regimes and trajectories: Manufacturing and service industries in a new taxonomy of sectoral patterns of innovation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(6-7), pages 978-994, July.
    9. Zhang, Yun & Weng, Qingxiong & Zhu, Nan, 2018. "The relationships between electronic banking adoption and its antecedents: A meta-analytic study of the role of national culture," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 76-87.
    10. Alalwan, Ali Abdallah & Dwivedi, Yogesh K. & Rana, Nripendra P., 2017. "Factors influencing adoption of mobile banking by Jordanian bank customers: Extending UTAUT2 with trust," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 99-110.
    11. Pierre-Andre Chiappori & Bernard Salanie, 2000. "Testing for Asymmetric Information in Insurance Markets," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 108(1), pages 56-78, February.
    12. Ankitha Shetty & Adithya D. Shetty & Rashmi Yogesh Pai & Rohini R. Rao & Rakshith Bhandary & Jyothi Shetty & Santosh Nayak & Tantri Keerthi Dinesh & Komal Jenifer Dsouza, 2022. "Block Chain Application in Insurance Services: A Systematic Review of the Evidence," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(1), pages 21582440221, March.
    13. Nambisan, Satish & Wright, Mike & Feldman, Maryann, 2019. "The digital transformation of innovation and entrepreneurship: Progress, challenges and key themes," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(8), pages 1-1.
    14. Huang, Tony Cheng-Kui & Liu, Chuang-Chun & Chang, Dong-Cheng, 2012. "An empirical investigation of factors influencing the adoption of data mining tools," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 257-270.
    15. Gary C. Moore & Izak Benbasat, 1991. "Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 2(3), pages 192-222, September.
    16. Sellywati Mohd Faizal & Nahariah Jaffar & Azleen Shabrina Mohd nor, 2022. "Integrate the adoption and readiness of digital technologies amongst accounting professionals towards the fourth industrial revolution," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(1), pages 2122160-212, December.
    17. Lütjen, Heiner & Schultz, Carsten & Tietze, Frank & Urmetzer, Florian, 2019. "Managing ecosystems for service innovation: A dynamic capability view," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 506-519.
    18. Z Irani & Y K Dwivedi & M D Williams, 2009. "Understanding consumer adoption of broadband: an extension of the technology acceptance model," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 60(10), pages 1322-1334, October.
    19. Hamed Taherdoost, 2019. "Importance of Technology Acceptance Assessment for Successful Implementation and Development of New Technologies," Post-Print hal-02557395, HAL.
    20. Scott E. Harrington, 2009. "The Financial Crisis, Systemic Risk, and the Future of Insurance Regulation," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 76(4), pages 785-819, December.
    21. Hamed Taherdoost, 2017. "Appraising the Smart Card Technology Adoption; Case of Application in University Environment," Post-Print hal-03741842, HAL.
    22. Meier, Samira & Rodriguez Gonzalez, Miguel & Kunze, Frederik, 2021. "The global financial crisis, the EMU sovereign debt crisis and international financial regulation: lessons from a systematic literature review," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    23. Janssen, Marijn & Weerakkody, Vishanth & Ismagilova, Elvira & Sivarajah, Uthayasankar & Irani, Zahir, 2020. "A framework for analysing blockchain technology adoption: Integrating institutional, market and technical factors," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 302-309.
    24. Rinaldo Evangelista, 2000. "Sectoral Patterns Of Technological Change In Services," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(3), pages 183-222.
    25. Oliveira, Tiago & Faria, Miguel & Thomas, Manoj Abraham & Popovič, Aleš, 2014. "Extending the understanding of mobile banking adoption: When UTAUT meets TTF and ITM," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 34(5), pages 689-703.
    26. Hamed Taherdoost, 2017. "Appraising the Smart Card Technology Adoption; Case of Application in University Environment," Post-Print hal-02557371, HAL.
    27. Hamed Taherdoost, 2018. "A review of technology acceptance and adoption models and theories," Post-Print hal-03741843, HAL.
    28. Roman Beck & Michel Avital & Matti Rossi & Jason Bennett Thatcher, 2017. "Blockchain Technology in Business and Information Systems Research," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 59(6), pages 381-384, December.
    29. Valentina Gatteschi & Fabrizio Lamberti & Claudio Demartini & Chiara Pranteda & Víctor Santamaría, 2018. "Blockchain and Smart Contracts for Insurance: Is the Technology Mature Enough?," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-16, February.
    30. Gupta, Somya & Ghardallou, Wafa & Pandey, Dharen Kumar & Sahu, Ganesh P., 2022. "Artificial intelligence adoption in the insurance industry: Evidence using the technology–organization–environment framework," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Queiroz, Maciel M. & Fosso Wamba, Samuel, 2019. "Blockchain adoption challenges in supply chain: An empirical investigation of the main drivers in India and the USA," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 70-82.
    2. Jain, Geetika & Kamble, Sachin S. & Ndubisi, Nelson Oly & Shrivastava, Archana & Belhadi, Amine & Venkatesh, Mani, 2022. "Antecedents of Blockchain-Enabled E-commerce Platforms (BEEP) adoption by customers – A study of second-hand small and medium apparel retailers," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 576-588.
    3. Lee, Hsing-fen & Miozzo, Marcela, 2019. "Which types of knowledge-intensive business services firms collaborate with universities for innovation?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(7), pages 1633-1646.
    4. Hamed Taherdoost, 2019. "Importance of Technology Acceptance Assessment for Successful Implementation and Development of New Technologies," Post-Print hal-02557395, HAL.
    5. Dehghani, Milad & William Kennedy, Ryan & Mashatan, Atefeh & Rese, Alexandra & Karavidas, Dionysios, 2022. "High interest, low adoption. A mixed-method investigation into the factors influencing organisational adoption of blockchain technology," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 393-411.
    6. Camilleri, Mark Anthony & Camilleri, Adriana Caterina, 2022. "Remote learning via video conferencing technologies: Implications for research and practice," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    7. Hamed Taherdoost, 2021. "Importance of Technology Acceptance Assessment for Successful Implementation and Development of New Technologies," Post-Print hal-03741844, HAL.
    8. Pina, Katia & Tether, Bruce S., 2016. "Towards understanding variety in knowledge intensive business services by distinguishing their knowledge bases," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(2), pages 401-413.
    9. Jaiswal, Deepak & Mohan, Ashutosh & Deshmukh, Arun Kumar, 2023. "Cash rich to cashless market: Segmentation and profiling of Fintech-led-Mobile payment users," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    10. Malaquias, Rodrigo F. & Hwang, Yujong, 2019. "Mobile banking use: A comparative study with Brazilian and U.S. participants," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 132-140.
    11. Khan, Ikram Ullah, 2022. "How does culture influence digital banking? A comparative study based on the unified model," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    12. Baabdullah, Abdullah M. & Alalwan, Ali Abdallah & Rana, Nripendra P. & Kizgin, Hatice & Patil, Pushp, 2019. "Consumer use of mobile banking (M-Banking) in Saudi Arabia: Towards an integrated model," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 38-52.
    13. Chang, Mona & Walimuni, Arachchilage C.S.M. & Kim, Min-cheol & Lim, Hwa-soon, 2022. "Acceptance of tourism blockchain based on UTAUT and connectivism theory," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    14. Francesco Bogliacino & Mario Pianta, 2016. "The Pavitt Taxonomy, revisited: patterns of innovation in manufacturing and services," Economia Politica: Journal of Analytical and Institutional Economics, Springer;Fondazione Edison, vol. 33(2), pages 153-180, August.
    15. Chang, Yuan-Chieh & Chen, Min-Nan, 2016. "Service regime and innovation clusters: An empirical study from service firms in Taiwan," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(9), pages 1845-1857.
    16. Francesca Mameli & Simona Iammarino & Ron Boschma, 2012. "Regional variety and employment growth in Italian labour market areas: services versus manufacturing industries," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 1203, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Feb 2012.
    17. Büttgen, Marion & al.,, 2021. "Blockchain in Service Management and Service Research - Developing a Research Agenda and Managerial Implications," SMR - Journal of Service Management Research, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 5(2), pages 71-102.
    18. Cirillo, Valeria & Fanti, Lucrezia & Mina, Andrea & Ricci, Andrea, 2023. "The adoption of digital technologies: Investment, skills, work organisation," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 89-105.
    19. Mahmoona Khalil & Kausar Fiaz Khawaja & Muddassar Sarfraz, 2022. "The adoption of blockchain technology in the financial sector during the era of fourth industrial revolution: a moderated mediated model," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 56(4), pages 2435-2452, August.
    20. repec:got:cegedp:102 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Teck Ming Tan & Saila Saraniemi, 2023. "Trust in blockchain-enabled exchanges: Future directions in blockchain marketing," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 51(4), pages 914-939, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Blockchain Technology; Insurance Industry;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04734348. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.