IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jftint/v10y2018i2p20-d132474.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Blockchain and Smart Contracts for Insurance: Is the Technology Mature Enough?

Author

Listed:
  • Valentina Gatteschi

    (Politecnico di Torino, Dipartimento di Automatica e Informatica, Corso Duca degli Abruzzi 24, 10129 Torino, Italy)

  • Fabrizio Lamberti

    (Politecnico di Torino, Dipartimento di Automatica e Informatica, Corso Duca degli Abruzzi 24, 10129 Torino, Italy)

  • Claudio Demartini

    (Politecnico di Torino, Dipartimento di Automatica e Informatica, Corso Duca degli Abruzzi 24, 10129 Torino, Italy)

  • Chiara Pranteda

    (Reale Group Innovation Team, Via Corte d’Appello 11, 10129 Torino, Italy)

  • Víctor Santamaría

    (Reale Group Innovation Team, Príncipe de Vergara, 125, 28002 Madrid, Spain)

Abstract

Blockchain is receiving increasing attention from academy and industry, since it is considered a breakthrough technology that could bring huge benefits to many different sectors. In 2017, Gartner positioned blockchain close to the peak of inflated expectations, acknowledging the enthusiasm for this technology that is now largely discussed by media. In this scenario, the risk to adopt it in the wake of enthusiasm, without objectively judging its actual added value is rather high. Insurance is one the sectors that, among others, started to carefully investigate the possibilities of blockchain. For this specific sector, however, the hype cycle shows that the technology is still in the innovation trigger phase, meaning that the spectrum of possible applications has not been fully explored yet. Insurers, as with many other companies not necessarily active only in the financial sector, are currently requested to make a hard decision, that is, whether to adopt blockchain or not, and they will only know if they were right in 3–5 years. The objective of this paper is to support actors involved in this decision process by illustrating what a blockchain is, analyzing its advantages and disadvantages, as well as discussing several use cases taken from the insurance sector, which could easily be extended to other domains.

Suggested Citation

  • Valentina Gatteschi & Fabrizio Lamberti & Claudio Demartini & Chiara Pranteda & Víctor Santamaría, 2018. "Blockchain and Smart Contracts for Insurance: Is the Technology Mature Enough?," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-16, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jftint:v:10:y:2018:i:2:p:20-:d:132474
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/10/2/20/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/10/2/20/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Micha Ober & Stefan Katzenbeisser & Kay Hamacher, 2013. "Structure and Anonymity of the Bitcoin Transaction Graph," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 5(2), pages 1-14, May.
    2. Zhen Hong & Zehua Wang & Wei Cai & Victor C. M. Leung, 2017. "Blockchain-Empowered Fair Computational Resource Sharing System in the D2D Network," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-21, November.
    3. Matthias Lischke & Benjamin Fabian, 2016. "Analyzing the Bitcoin Network: The First Four Years," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-40, March.
    4. Luisanna Cocco & Andrea Pinna & Michele Marchesi, 2017. "Banking on Blockchain: Costs Savings Thanks to the Blockchain Technology," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-20, June.
    5. Xiruo Liu & Meiyuan Zhao & Sugang Li & Feixiong Zhang & Wade Trappe, 2017. "A Security Framework for the Internet of Things in the Future Internet Architecture," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-28, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Francisco Javier García-Corral & José Antonio Cordero-García & Jaime de Pablo-Valenciano & Juan Uribe-Toril, 2022. "A bibliometric review of cryptocurrencies: how have they grown?," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 8(1), pages 1-31, December.
    2. Karau, Sören, 2021. "Monetary policy and Bitcoin," Discussion Papers 41/2021, Deutsche Bundesbank.
    3. Nadia Pocher & Mirko Zichichi & Fabio Merizzi & Muhammad Zohaib Shafiq & Stefano Ferretti, 2023. "Detecting anomalous cryptocurrency transactions: An AML/CFT application of machine learning-based forensics," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 33(1), pages 1-17, December.
    4. Wang Guizhou & Zhang Si & Yu Tao & Ning Yu, 2021. "A Systematic Overview of Blockchain Research," Journal of Systems Science and Information, De Gruyter, vol. 9(3), pages 205-238, June.
    5. Komulainen, Ruey & Nätti, Satu, 2023. "Barriers to blockchain adoption: Empirical observations from securities services value network," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    6. Yang Xia & Wenjia Zeng & Xinjie Xing & Yuanzhu Zhan & Kim Hua Tan & Ajay Kumar, 2023. "Joint optimisation of drone routing and battery wear for sustainable supply chain development: a mixed-integer programming model based on blockchain-enabled fleet sharing," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 327(1), pages 89-127, August.
    7. Radosław Miśkiewicz & Krzysztof Matan & Jakub Karnowski, 2022. "The Role of Crypto Trading in the Economy, Renewable Energy Consumption and Ecological Degradation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-15, May.
    8. Boon-Chong Seet & Syed Faraz Hasan & Peter Han-Joo Chong, 2018. "Recent Advances on Cellular D2D Communications," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-3, January.
    9. Muhammad MOHSIN & Sobia NASEEM & Larisa IVAȘCU & Lucian-Ionel CIOCA & Muddassar SARFRAZ & Nicolae Cristian STĂNICĂ, 2021. "Gauging the Effect of Investor Sentiment on Cryptocurrency Market: An Analysis of Bitcoin Currency," Journal for Economic Forecasting, Institute for Economic Forecasting, vol. 0(4), pages 87-102, December.
    10. Meennapa Rukhiran & Songwut Boonsong & Paniti Netinant, 2024. "Sustainable Optimizing Performance and Energy Efficiency in Proof of Work Blockchain: A Multilinear Regression Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-38, February.
    11. Seyed Alireza Athari & Ngo Thai Hung, 2022. "Time–frequency return co-movement among asset classes around the COVID-19 outbreak: portfolio implications," Journal of Economics and Finance, Springer;Academy of Economics and Finance, vol. 46(4), pages 736-756, October.
    12. Claudia Antal & Tudor Cioara & Ionut Anghel & Marcel Antal & Ioan Salomie, 2021. "Distributed Ledger Technology Review and Decentralized Applications Development Guidelines," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-32, February.
    13. Yu-Cheng Kao & Kao-Yi Shen & San-Ting Lee & Joseph C. P. Shieh, 2022. "Selecting the Fintech Strategy for Supply Chain Finance: A Hybrid Decision Approach for Banks," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(14), pages 1-20, July.
    14. Natkamon Tovanich & R'emy Cazabet, 2022. "Pattern Analysis of Money Flow in the Bitcoin Blockchain," Papers 2207.07315, arXiv.org.
    15. Alya Ayuniey Mohd Fairoh & Nurul Najihah Hussin & Nur Aina Arisha Jamali & MAZURINA MOHD ALI, 2024. "The Impact of Blockchain in Financial Industry: A Concept Paper," Information Management and Business Review, AMH International, vol. 16(1), pages 190-196.
    16. Milena Oehlers & Benjamin Fabian, 2021. "Graph Metrics for Network Robustness—A Survey," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-48, April.
    17. Chao, Xiangrui & Ran, Qin & Chen, Jia & Li, Tie & Qian, Qian & Ergu, Daji, 2022. "Regulatory technology (Reg-Tech) in financial stability supervision: Taxonomy, key methods, applications and future directions," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    18. Vincent Gramlich & Tobias Guggenberger & Marc Principato & Benjamin Schellinger & Nils Urbach, 2023. "A multivocal literature review of decentralized finance: Current knowledge and future research avenues," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 33(1), pages 1-37, December.
    19. Ali, Fahad & Khurram, Muhammad Usman & Sensoy, Ahmet & Vo, Xuan Vinh, 2024. "Green cryptocurrencies and portfolio diversification in the era of greener paths," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    20. Dénes László Fekete & Attila Kiss, 2021. "A Survey of Ledger Technology-Based Databases," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-22, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jftint:v:10:y:2018:i:2:p:20-:d:132474. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.