IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-04554013.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Le temps dans le discours, expérimentation d’un protocole d’observation des caractéristiques temporelles d’un corpus d’avis de salariés

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel Pélissier

    (IDETCOM - Institut du Droit de l'Espace, des Territoires, de la Culture et de la Communication - UT Capitole - Université Toulouse Capitole - UT - Université de Toulouse)

Abstract

Temps et langage sont étroitement liés. La lexicométrie a développé des méthodes pour comprendre les discours dans le temps. Cet article propose une approche complémentaire en étudiant le temps dans le langage. L'expérimentation porte sur une méthode structurée d'analyse du temps dans le discours à partir d'un corpus de données massives d'avis de salariés. Le protocole utilisé permet d'aborder le sens par les spécificités temporelles. Les limites constatées de cette approche exploratoire justifient une poursuite des recherches sur ce questionnement original.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel Pélissier, 2022. "Le temps dans le discours, expérimentation d’un protocole d’observation des caractéristiques temporelles d’un corpus d’avis de salariés," Post-Print hal-04554013, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04554013
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-04554013
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-04554013/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xiaoguang Wang & Qikai Cheng & Wei Lu, 2014. "Analyzing evolution of research topics with NEViewer: a new method based on dynamic co-word networks," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 101(2), pages 1253-1271, November.
    2. Martin Rosvall & Carl T Bergstrom, 2010. "Mapping Change in Large Networks," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(1), pages 1-7, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ali Najmi & Taha H. Rashidi & Alireza Abbasi & S. Travis Waller, 2017. "Reviewing the transport domain: an evolutionary bibliometrics and network analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 110(2), pages 843-865, February.
    2. Jimi Adams & Ryan Light, 2014. "Mapping Interdisciplinary Fields: Efficiencies, Gaps and Redundancies in HIV/AIDS Research," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(12), pages 1-13, December.
    3. Melissa Haller & David L. Rigby, 2020. "The geographic evolution of optics technologies in the United States, 1976–2010," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 99(6), pages 1539-1559, December.
    4. Zhichao Ba & Yujie Cao & Jin Mao & Gang Li, 2019. "A hierarchical approach to analyzing knowledge integration between two fields—a case study on medical informatics and computer science," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 119(3), pages 1455-1486, June.
    5. Luis Lorenzo & Javier Arroyo, 2022. "Analysis of the cryptocurrency market using different prototype-based clustering techniques," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 8(1), pages 1-46, December.
    6. Benjamin Allen & Christine Sample & Yulia Dementieva & Ruben C Medeiros & Christopher Paoletti & Martin A Nowak, 2015. "The Molecular Clock of Neutral Evolution Can Be Accelerated or Slowed by Asymmetric Spatial Structure," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(2), pages 1-32, February.
    7. Bech, Morten L. & Bergstrom, Carl T. & Rosvall, Martin & Garratt, Rodney J., 2015. "Mapping change in the overnight money market," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 424(C), pages 44-51.
    8. Nicolo Musmeci & Tomaso Aste & Tiziana Di Matteo, 2014. "Relation between Financial Market Structure and the Real Economy: Comparison between Clustering Methods," Papers 1406.0496, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2015.
    9. Wenyuan Liu & Andrea Nanetti & Siew Ann Cheong, 2017. "Knowledge evolution in physics research: An analysis of bibliographic coupling networks," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(9), pages 1-19, September.
    10. Günter Wallner & Simone Kriglstein & Edward Chung & Syeed Anta Kashfi, 2018. "Visualisation of trip chaining behaviour and mode choice using household travel survey data," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 10(3), pages 427-453, December.
    11. Vincent Labatut & Jean-Michel Balasque, 2012. "Detection and Interpretation of Communities in Complex Networks: Methods and Practical Application," Post-Print hal-00633653, HAL.
    12. P. Dorta-González & M. I. Dorta-González, 2013. "Comparing journals from different fields of science and social science through a JCR subject categories normalized impact factor," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 95(2), pages 645-672, May.
    13. Ying Lu & Walter Timo de Vries, 2021. "A Bibliometric and Visual Analysis of Rural Development Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-21, May.
    14. Benatti, Alexandre & Ferraz de Arrruda, Henrique & Nascimento Silva, Filipi & da Fontoura Costa, Luciano, 2021. "Enriching and analyzing small citation networks: A case study on transistor’s history," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 573(C).
    15. Loet Leydesdorff & Caroline S. Wagner & Lutz Bornmann, 2018. "Discontinuities in citation relations among journals: self-organized criticality as a model of scientific revolutions and change," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 116(1), pages 623-644, July.
    16. Caroline Ceribeli & Henrique Ferraz de Arruda & Luciano da Fontoura Costa, 2021. "How coupled are capillary electrophoresis and mass spectrometry?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(5), pages 3841-3851, May.
    17. Fan, Yangliu & Lehmann, Sune & Blok, Anders, 2022. "Extracting the interdisciplinary specialty structures in social media data-based research: A clustering-based network approach," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 16(3).
    18. Morten L. Bech & Carl T. Bergstrom & Rod Garratt & Martin Rosvall, 2011. "Mapping change in the federal funds market," Staff Reports 507, Federal Reserve Bank of New York.
    19. Sun, Xiaoling & Ding, Kun & Lin, Yuan, 2016. "Mapping the evolution of scientific fields based on cross-field authors," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 10(3), pages 750-761.
    20. Luca Marotta & Salvatore Miccichè & Yoshi Fujiwara & Hiroshi Iyetomi & Hideaki Aoyama & Mauro Gallegati & Rosario N Mantegna, 2015. "Bank-Firm Credit Network in Japan: An Analysis of a Bipartite Network," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(5), pages 1-18, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04554013. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.