IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-04429520.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Tooke Versus Ricardo On The Resumption Of Convertibility In 1819-1821

Author

Listed:
  • Ghislain Deleplace

    (LED - Laboratoire d'Economie Dionysien - UP8 - Université Paris 8 Vincennes-Saint-Denis)

Abstract

The relationship between Tooke and Ricardo on money is not obvious. The comfortable intuition is that, since Tooke opposed the Currency School, and since the Currency School assumed Ricardo's heritage, Tooke was anti-Ricardian. However, there are at least two reasons not to follow this intuition. One is that the continuity between Ricardo's monetary theory and the Currency School may be seriously questioned. The second reason is that Tooke as the main figure of the Banking School in the 1840s was substantially different from the early Tooke who wrote in the 1820s. To avoid misapprehension of the relationship between Tooke and Ricardo on money, it may thus be useful to compare their respective positions on a subject on which both of them spoke and wrote: the suspension and the resumption of convertibility. After having been suspended since 1797, the convertibility of the Bank of England note was resumed on 1st February 1820, following Peel's Bill adopted the preceding year. A major change was introduced by comparison with the pre-1797 system: convertibility was to be into bullion and not into coin. In his 1816 pamphlet Proposals for an Economical and Secure Currency this scheme had been advocated by Ricardo as a permanent device, which amounted to eliminate metallic currency. By contrast, Peel's Bill made it temporary, for a period of three years. In the end, this experiment was discontinued after a little more than one year: on 1st May 1821 the old system of cash payments was resumed. Tooke had been examined on 22nd March 1819 by the Lords' Committee on Resumption. He supported then Ricardo's plan but only as a temporary measure, until it would be possible to return to cash payments. In 1826 he published a pamphlet which contained a whole section devoted to a critique of convertibility into bullion as a permanent system, and in 1829 he published another pamphlet in which he showed that Peel's Bill had had no effect on the deflation and the stagnation of trade which had occurred in the subsequent years – a view consistent with Ricardo's one – and that the Bank of England could not either be considered as responsible for this situation – contrary to what Ricardo contended. It thus makes sense to reconstruct a post mortem dialogue between Ricardo (who had died in 1823) and Tooke on the effects of the suspension and the resumption of convertibility.

Suggested Citation

  • Ghislain Deleplace, 2023. "Tooke Versus Ricardo On The Resumption Of Convertibility In 1819-1821," Post-Print hal-04429520, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04429520
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-04429520
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-04429520/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Arnon,Arie, 2011. "Monetary Theory and Policy from Hume and Smith to Wicksell," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521191135, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nicola Acocella-super-, 2017. "The Rise And Decline Of Economic Policy As An Autonomous Discipline: A Critical Survey," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(3), pages 661-677, July.
    2. Sissoko, Carolyn & Ishizu, Mina, 2021. "How the West India trade fostered last resort lending by the Bank of England," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 108565, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    3. Charles A. E. Goodhart & Meinhard A. Jensen, 2015. "A Commentary on Patrizio Lainà's 'Proposals for Full-Reserve Banking: A Historical Survey from David Ricardo to Martin Wolf'," Economic Thought, World Economics Association, vol. 4(2), pages 1-20, September.
    4. Ghislain Deleplace, 2020. "An Unorthodox Genealogy on the Relation between the Markets for Currency Exchange and Credit in Steuart, Thornton, Tooke, and Keynes (1923)," Post-Print hal-04253401, HAL.
    5. Michele Bee & Luiz Felipe Bruzzi Curi, 2024. "Agreement is money: Beyond the chartalist reading of Adam Smith," Textos para Discussão Cedeplar-UFMG 666, Cedeplar, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais.
    6. Robert W. Dimand, 2013. "David Hume and Irving Fisher on the quantity theory of money in the long run and the short run," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(2), pages 284-304, April.
    7. Laurent Le Maux, 2021. "Bagehot for Central Bankers," Working Papers Series inetwp147, Institute for New Economic Thinking.
    8. Ciccone, Michele, 2022. "Some notes on Ricardo's analysis of the convergence process of the market rate of interest to the natural rate," MPRA Paper 112887, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Mauricio C. Coutinho, 2014. "Arguments On Nom-Metallic Money (1650-1750)," Anais do XLI Encontro Nacional de Economia [Proceedings of the 41st Brazilian Economics Meeting] 006, ANPEC - Associação Nacional dos Centros de Pós-Graduação em Economia [Brazilian Association of Graduate Programs in Economics].
    10. Ghislain Deleplace, 2021. "“La crédibilité d’une monnaie à étalon métallique chez Law, Steuart, Thonton, Ricardo”," Post-Print hal-04429170, HAL.
    11. Samuel Demeulemeester, 2021. "The 100% money proposal of the 1930s: an avatar of the Currency School’s reform ideas?," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(4), pages 577-598, July.
    12. Jérôme de Boyer des Roches, 2013. "Bank liquidity risk: From John Law (1705) to Walter Bagehot (1873)," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(4), pages 547-571, August.
    13. Duncan, Alfred & Nolan, Charles, 2023. "Adam Smith And The Bankers: Retrospect And Prospect," National Institute Economic Review, National Institute of Economic and Social Research, vol. 265, pages 70-104, August.
    14. Notermans Ton, 2015. "The EU's Convergence Dilemma," TalTech Journal of European Studies, Sciendo, vol. 5(1), pages 36-55, February.
    15. Goodhart, Charles & Jensen, Meinhard, 2015. "Currency School versus Banking School: an ongoing confrontation," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 64068, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    16. Carolyn Sissoko, 2022. "Becoming a central bank: The development of the Bank of England's private sector lending policies during the Restriction," Economic History Review, Economic History Society, vol. 75(2), pages 601-632, May.
    17. Lambert, Thomas, 2019. "Bankers as Immoral? The Parallels between Aquinas’s Views on Usury and Marxian Views of Banking and Credit," MPRA Paper 97741, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    18. Lilia Costabile, 2016. "The value and security of money. Metallic and fiduciary media in Ferdinando Galiani's Della moneta," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(3), pages 400-424, June.
    19. David Laidler, 2013. "Professor Fisher and the quantity theory -- a significant encounter," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(2), pages 174-205, April.
    20. Michael Peneder & Andreas Resch, 2015. "Schumpeter and venture finance: radical theorist, broke investor, and enigmatic teacher," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 24(6), pages 1315-1352.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    David Ricardo; Thomas Tooke; convertibility; monetary theory;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04429520. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.