IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/eujhet/v20y2013i4p547-571.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bank liquidity risk: From John Law (1705) to Walter Bagehot (1873)

Author

Listed:
  • Jérôme de Boyer des Roches

Abstract

By granting credit and issuing money, banks take a liquidity risk - that is, the risk of being unable to reimburse its notes in coins. Five different explanations of a bank liquidity crisis have been provided by different authors, since John Law and up to Walter Bagehot. First, according to Law (1703) and Steuart ([1767] [1998]), the distinction between money of account (the pound sterling) and money of payment (the guinea) may induce a bank run. Second, according to Cantillon (1730), Hume ([1752] 1972), Ricardo (1810-1823) and the Currency School (1837-1858), the bank reserve becomes insufficient as a consequence of a diminishing value of money allied with over issues. Third, according to Thornton ([1802] 1939, 1991) and the Banking School (1840-1857), it can occur as a consequence of a falling exchange rate that is not linked with over issues. Fourth, according to Smith (1776) and the Banking School, discounting of fictitious bills, by decreasing the shareholders' funds, leads to bank illiquidity. Lastly, according to Thornton ([1802] 1939, 1991) and Bagehot (1873), the liquidity crisis is a consequence of bank panics: a "flight" to money for Thornton, a "flight" to credit for Bagehot. The analysis of these five different explanations sheds new light on classical monetary controversies.

Suggested Citation

  • Jérôme de Boyer des Roches, 2013. "Bank liquidity risk: From John Law (1705) to Walter Bagehot (1873)," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(4), pages 547-571, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:eujhet:v:20:y:2013:i:4:p:547-571
    DOI: 10.1080/09672567.2011.653878
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09672567.2011.653878
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09672567.2011.653878?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Creedy, J. & O'Brien, D.P. (ed.), 1984. "Economic Analysis in Historical Perspective," Elsevier Monographs, Elsevier, edition 1, number 9780408114301.
    2. Ricardo, David, 1810. "The High Price of Bullion, a Proof of the Depreciation of Bank Notes," History of Economic Thought Books, McMaster University Archive for the History of Economic Thought, number ricardo1810.
    3. Smith, Matthew, 2003. "On Central Banking “Rules”: Tooke's Critique of the Bank Charter Act of 1844," Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Cambridge University Press, vol. 25(1), pages 39-61, March.
    4. Arnon,Arie, 2011. "Monetary Theory and Policy from Hume and Smith to Wicksell," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521191135, September.
    5. Tooke, Thomas, 1844. "An Inquiry into the Currency Principle," History of Economic Thought Books, McMaster University Archive for the History of Economic Thought, number tooke1844.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. repec:dau:papers:123456789/10195 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. repec:dau:papers:123456789/10190 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Rebeca Gomez Betancourt & Jérôme de Boyer des Roches, 2013. "Origins and developments of Irving Fisher's compensated dollar plan," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(2), pages 261-283, April.
    4. Curott, Nicholas, 2016. "Adam Smith’s Theory of Money and Banking," Studies in Applied Economics 47, The Johns Hopkins Institute for Applied Economics, Global Health, and the Study of Business Enterprise.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nicola Acocella-super-, 2017. "The Rise And Decline Of Economic Policy As An Autonomous Discipline: A Critical Survey," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(3), pages 661-677, July.
    2. Hallegatte, Stéphane & Ghil, Michael, 2008. "Natural disasters impacting a macroeconomic model with endogenous dynamics," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(1-2), pages 582-592, December.
    3. Sissoko, Carolyn & Ishizu, Mina, 2021. "How the West India trade fostered last resort lending by the Bank of England," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 108565, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    4. Sproul, Michael, 2018. "The Real Meaning of the real Bills Doctrine," MPRA Paper 87608, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Rudiger Dornbusch & Jacob A. Frenkel, 1984. "The Gold Standard and the Bank of England in the Crisis of 1847," NBER Chapters, in: A Retrospective on the Classical Gold Standard, 1821-1931, pages 233-276, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    6. Charles A. E. Goodhart & Meinhard A. Jensen, 2015. "A Commentary on Patrizio Lainà's 'Proposals for Full-Reserve Banking: A Historical Survey from David Ricardo to Martin Wolf'," Economic Thought, World Economics Association, vol. 4(2), pages 1-20, September.
    7. Ghislain Deleplace, 2020. "An Unorthodox Genealogy on the Relation between the Markets for Currency Exchange and Credit in Steuart, Thornton, Tooke, and Keynes (1923)," Post-Print hal-04253401, HAL.
    8. Michele Bee & Luiz Felipe Bruzzi Curi, 2024. "Agreement is money: Beyond the chartalist reading of Adam Smith," Textos para Discussão Cedeplar-UFMG 666, Cedeplar, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais.
    9. Robert W. Dimand, 2013. "David Hume and Irving Fisher on the quantity theory of money in the long run and the short run," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(2), pages 284-304, April.
    10. Laurent Le Maux, 2021. "Bagehot for Central Bankers," Working Papers Series inetwp147, Institute for New Economic Thinking.
    11. Ciccone, Michele, 2022. "Some notes on Ricardo's analysis of the convergence process of the market rate of interest to the natural rate," MPRA Paper 112887, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. Gilbert Faccarello, 2006. "An 'exception culturelle'? French sensationist political economy and the shaping of public economics," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(1), pages 1-38.
    13. Mauricio C. Coutinho, 2014. "Arguments On Nom-Metallic Money (1650-1750)," Anais do XLI Encontro Nacional de Economia [Proceedings of the 41st Brazilian Economics Meeting] 006, ANPEC - Associação Nacional dos Centros de Pós-Graduação em Economia [Brazilian Association of Graduate Programs in Economics].
    14. Sylvie Diatkine, 2013. "Monetary policy on interest rates: a retrospective analysis since Thornton," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(5), pages 715-740, October.
    15. Christopher J. Niggle, 1991. "The Endogenous Money Supply Theory: An Institutionalist Appraisal," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(1), pages 137-151, March.
    16. Jerome de Boyer des Roches, 2007. "Cause and effect in the gold points mechanism: A criticism of Ricardo's criticism of Thornton," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(1), pages 25-53.
    17. Ghislain Deleplace, 2021. "“La crédibilité d’une monnaie à étalon métallique chez Law, Steuart, Thonton, Ricardo”," Post-Print hal-04429170, HAL.
    18. Sproul, Michael, 2018. "The Real Meaning of the Real Bills Doctrine (revised Nov., 2018)," MPRA Paper 90012, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 13 Nov 2018.
    19. Samuel Demeulemeester, 2021. "The 100% money proposal of the 1930s: an avatar of the Currency School’s reform ideas?," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(4), pages 577-598, July.
    20. John Creedy: Nicolas Herault & Guyonne Kalb, 2008. "Tax Policy Design and The Role of a Tax-Free Threshold," Department of Economics - Working Papers Series 1046, The University of Melbourne.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:eujhet:v:20:y:2013:i:4:p:547-571. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/REJH20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.