IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-04379581.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

ChatGPT in Academic Research: Demonstrating Limitations through Real Practical Examples

Author

Listed:
  • Amina Badreddine

    (UMBB - Université M'Hamed Bougara Boumerdes)

  • Hadjira Larbi Cherif

    (UMBB - Université M'Hamed Bougara Boumerdes)

Abstract

في الساحة الأكاديمية، يستخدم الأساتذة والطلاب نماذج الذكاء الاصطناعي مثل ChatGPT في مجموعة متنوعة من المهام الأكاديمية وغير الأكاديمية، بما في ذلك كتابة المقالات وكتابة الخطابات الرسمية وغير الرسمية وتلخيص المقالات الأدبية وتوليد الأفكار الإبداعية. ومع ذلك، ما زال هناك جدل كبير حول دور ChatGPT في البحث العلمي. تهدف هذا الدراسة إلى تسليط الضوء على استخدام ChatGPT في البحث الأكاديمي من خلال أمثلة حقيقية. تشير نتائجنا إلى أن ChatGPT يمكن أن يكون أداة قوية لتوليد الأفكار الأولية في البحث العلمي. ومع ذلك، قد تظهر تحديات عندما يتعلق الأمر بالدراسات السابقة الاستشهادات و المصادر وتحديد مشكلات البحث وتحديد الفجوات البحثية وإجراء تحليل البيانات. لذا، يجب على الاكاديمين أن يكونوا حذرين عند استخدام ChatGPT في البحث الأكاديمي. لذلك نرى أنه من الضروري إنشاء إرشادات واضحة لكيفية استخدام الذكاء الاصطناعي بحذر في البحث والنشر العلمي.

Suggested Citation

  • Amina Badreddine & Hadjira Larbi Cherif, 2023. "ChatGPT in Academic Research: Demonstrating Limitations through Real Practical Examples," Post-Print hal-04379581, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04379581
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-04379581
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-04379581/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chris Stokel-Walker, 2023. "ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove," Nature, Nature, vol. 613(7945), pages 620-621, January.
    2. Holly Else, 2023. "Abstracts written by ChatGPT fool scientists," Nature, Nature, vol. 613(7944), pages 423-423, January.
    3. Dowling, Michael & Lucey, Brian, 2023. "ChatGPT for (Finance) research: The Bananarama Conjecture," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Giordano, Vito & Spada, Irene & Chiarello, Filippo & Fantoni, Gualtiero, 2024. "The impact of ChatGPT on human skills: A quantitative study on twitter data," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    2. Arpan Kumar Kar & P. S. Varsha & Shivakami Rajan, 2023. "Unravelling the Impact of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI) in Industrial Applications: A Review of Scientific and Grey Literature," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 24(4), pages 659-689, December.
    3. Alin ZAMFIROIU & Denisa VASILE & Daniel SAVU, 2023. "ChatGPT – A Systematic Review of Published Research Papers," Informatica Economica, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 27(1), pages 5-16.
    4. Peres, Renana & Schreier, Martin & Schweidel, David & Sorescu, Alina, 2023. "On ChatGPT and beyond: How generative artificial intelligence may affect research, teaching, and practice," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 40(2), pages 269-275.
    5. Chiarello, Filippo & Giordano, Vito & Spada, Irene & Barandoni, Simone & Fantoni, Gualtiero, 2024. "Future applications of generative large language models: A data-driven case study on ChatGPT," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    6. Fosso Wamba, Samuel & Queiroz, Maciel M. & Chiappetta Jabbour, Charbel Jose & Shi, Chunming (Victor), 2023. "Are both generative AI and ChatGPT game changers for 21st-Century operations and supply chain excellence?," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    7. Edisa Lozić & Benjamin Štular, 2023. "Fluent but Not Factual: A Comparative Analysis of ChatGPT and Other AI Chatbots’ Proficiency and Originality in Scientific Writing for Humanities," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-26, October.
    8. Rice, Stephen & Crouse, Sean R. & Winter, Scott R. & Rice, Connor, 2024. "The advantages and limitations of using ChatGPT to enhance technological research," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    9. Smales, Lee A., 2023. "Classification of RBA monetary policy announcements using ChatGPT," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 58(PC).
    10. Hassnian Ali & Ahmet Faruk Aysan, 2023. "What will ChatGPT revolutionize in the financial industry?," Modern Finance, Modern Finance Institute, vol. 1(1), pages 116-129.
    11. Wang Xian & Chen Guomin & Varsha Arya & Kwok Tai Chui, 2024. "Examining the Influence of AI Chatbots on Semantic Web-Based Global Information Management in Various Industries," International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems (IJSWIS), IGI Global, vol. 20(1), pages 1-14, January.
    12. Pawe{l} Niszczota & Paul Conway, 2023. "Judgments of research co-created by generative AI: experimental evidence," Papers 2305.11873, arXiv.org.
    13. Alonso-Robisco, Andres & Carbó, José Manuel, 2023. "Analysis of CBDC narrative by central banks using large language models," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 58(PC).
    14. Howell, Bronwyn E. & Potgieter, Petrus H., 2023. "AI-generated lemons: a sour outlook for content producers?," 32nd European Regional ITS Conference, Madrid 2023: Realising the digital decade in the European Union – Easier said than done? 277971, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    15. Christian Fieberg & Lars Hornuf & David J. Streich, 2023. "Using GPT-4 for Financial Advice," CESifo Working Paper Series 10529, CESifo.
    16. Talaei-Khoei, Amir & Yang, Alan T. & Masialeti, Masialeti, 2024. "How does incorporating ChatGPT within a firm reinforce agility-mediated performance? The moderating role of innovation infusion and firms’ ethical identity," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    17. Konstantinos I. Roumeliotis & Nikolaos D. Tselikas, 2023. "ChatGPT and Open-AI Models: A Preliminary Review," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-24, May.
    18. Li Xian Liu & Zhiyue Sun & Kunpeng Xu & Chao Chen, 2024. "AI-Driven Financial Analysis: Exploring ChatGPT’s Capabilities and Challenges," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-35, June.
    19. Cordery, Carolyn J. & Goncharenko, Galina & Polzer, Tobias & McConville, Danielle & Belal, Ataur, 2023. "NGOs’ performance, governance, and accountability in the era of digital transformation," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 55(5).
    20. Wang, Haibo, 2024. "Decoding herding dynamics in the generative AI investment amid key technological advancements: A timeline perspective," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ChatGPT Academic research authorship gaps; ChatGPT; Academic research; authorship; gaps;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04379581. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.