Author
Listed:
- Claire Mosnier
(UMRH - Unité Mixte de Recherche sur les Herbivores - UMR 1213 - VAS - VetAgro Sup - Institut national d'enseignement supérieur et de recherche en alimentation, santé animale, sciences agronomiques et de l'environnement - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement)
- Sanae Boukhriss
(LEREPS - Laboratoire d'Etude et de Recherche sur l'Economie, les Politiques et les Systèmes Sociaux - UT Capitole - Université Toulouse Capitole - UT - Université de Toulouse - UT2J - Université Toulouse - Jean Jaurès - UT - Université de Toulouse - Institut d'Études Politiques [IEP] - Toulouse - ENSFEA - École Nationale Supérieure de Formation de l'Enseignement Agricole de Toulouse-Auzeville)
- Jean-Joseph Minviel
(UMRH - Unité Mixte de Recherche sur les Herbivores - UMR 1213 - VAS - VetAgro Sup - Institut national d'enseignement supérieur et de recherche en alimentation, santé animale, sciences agronomiques et de l'environnement - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement)
Abstract
CONTEXT Pig production systems are currently in decline in the French Massif Central, while herbivore production systems, most of which are specialised, generate little income. The diversification of herbivore farms with pig production appears to be an interesting lever for improving farm sustainability. OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to assess the impacts of adding pig production on the sustainability of beef and dairy farms and to assess the pros and cons of a DEA based multicriteria evaluation model. METHODS The Orfee bioeconomic model was used to simulate 17 beef or dairy farms with and without pigs. This pig production system consists of either a farrow-to-finish sow production system or a pig fattening production system only. The structural and technical parameters of these farms were established from a farm survey. Farm sustainability was assessed using 17 indicators. These indicators were hierarchically aggregated into a single sustainability composite indicator using an innovative method, the constrained directional benefit of the doubt (D-BoD) method. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS The results indicate that the addition of a pig production system has an overall positive impact on the sustainability of cattle farms. Mixed cattle-pig systems score significantly better on the social dimension as they generate more jobs and contribute more to food security. The overall economic performance is not significantly better than that of specialized systems for the price context from 2012 to 2022. The pig production system increases the average income per work unit for cattle farms but needs more purchased inputs to produce. This reduces but not offsets the risk reduction advantage of diversification and reduces production efficiency. Mixed farms do not score higher than specialized cattle farms on the environmental dimension. Mixed farms contribute less to global warming per kg of protein produced but have higher nitrogen and phosphorus surpluses. The constrained D-BoD method is a useful tool for endogenously aggregating indicators without having to arbitrarily set weights and thresholds to evaluate performance, but with certain limitations, such as the possibility that a farm may be judged efficient if it performs better on some indicators while being relatively weak on others. SIGNIFICANCE Favouring mixed farming appears to be an interesting lever for territorial development, but with two important issues: local supply of pig feed at a secure price and improved manure management to allow a virtuous cycle of nutrients.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's
web page
whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
search for a similarly titled item that would be
available.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04133236. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.