IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-03709623.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Techno-economic analysis of forward osmosis pre-concentration before an anaerobic membrane bioreactor: Impact of draw solute and membrane material

Author

Listed:
  • Sergi Vinardell

    (UB - Universitat de Barcelona)

  • Gaetan Blandin

    (UdG - Universitat de Girona = University of Girona)

  • Federico Ferrari
  • Geoffroy Lesage

    (IEM - Institut Européen des membranes - INC-CNRS - Institut de Chimie - CNRS Chimie - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - UM - Université de Montpellier - ENSCM - Ecole Nationale Supérieure de Chimie de Montpellier - UM - Université de Montpellier)

  • Joan Mata-Alvarez

    (UB - Universitat de Barcelona)

  • Joan Dosta
  • Sergi Astals

    (UB - Universitat de Barcelona)

Abstract

This research investigated the impact of draw solute and membrane material on the economic balance of a forward osmosis (FO) system pre-concentrating municipal sewage prior to an anaerobic membrane bioreactor (AnMBR). Eight and three different draw solutes were evaluated for cellulose triacetate (CTA) and polyamide thin film composite (TFC) membranes, respectively. The material of the FO membrane was a key economic driver since the net cost of TFC membrane was substantially lower than the CTA membrane. The draw solute had a moderate impact on the economic balance. The most economically favourable draw solutes were sodium acetate and calcium chloride for the CTA membrane and magnesium chloride for the TFC membrane. The FO + AnMBR performance was modelled for both FO membrane materials and each draw solute considering three FO recoveries (50, 80 and 90%). The estimated COD removal efficiency of the AnMBR was similar regardless of the draw solute and FO membrane material. However, the COD and draw solute concentrations in the permeate and digestate increased as the FO recovery increased. These results highlight that FO membranes with high permselectivity are needed to improve the economic balance of mainstream AnMBR and to ensure the quality of the permeate and digestate.

Suggested Citation

  • Sergi Vinardell & Gaetan Blandin & Federico Ferrari & Geoffroy Lesage & Joan Mata-Alvarez & Joan Dosta & Sergi Astals, 2022. "Techno-economic analysis of forward osmosis pre-concentration before an anaerobic membrane bioreactor: Impact of draw solute and membrane material," Post-Print hal-03709623, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03709623
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131776
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-03709623
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-03709623/document
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131776?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Whiting, Andrew & Azapagic, Adisa, 2014. "Life cycle environmental impacts of generating electricity and heat from biogas produced by anaerobic digestion," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 181-193.
    2. Zhen, Guangyin & Pan, Yang & Lu, Xueqin & Li, Yu-You & Zhang, Zhongyi & Niu, Chengxin & Kumar, Gopalakrishnan & Kobayashi, Takuro & Zhao, Youcai & Xu, Kaiqin, 2019. "Anaerobic membrane bioreactor towards biowaste biorefinery and chemical energy harvest: Recent progress, membrane fouling and future perspectives," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    3. Vinardell, S. & Astals, S. & Peces, M. & Cardete, M.A. & Fernández, I. & Mata-Alvarez, J. & Dosta, J., 2020. "Advances in anaerobic membrane bioreactor technology for municipal wastewater treatment: A 2020 updated review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Huang, Bao-Cheng & He, Chuan-Shu & Fan, Nian-Si & Jin, Ren-Cun & Yu, Han-Qing, 2020. "Envisaging wastewater-to-energy practices for sustainable urban water pollution control: Current achievements and future prospects," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    2. Grim, Johanna & Malmros, Peter & Schnürer, Anna & Nordberg, Åke, 2015. "Comparison of pasteurization and integrated thermophilic sanitation at a full-scale biogas plant – Heat demand and biogas production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 419-427.
    3. Zhang, Xiaoyue & Huang, Guohe & Liu, Lirong & Li, Kailong, 2022. "Development of a stochastic multistage lifecycle programming model for electric power system planning – A case study for the Province of Saskatchewan, Canada," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    4. Bacenetti, Jacopo & Sala, Cesare & Fusi, Alessandra & Fiala, Marco, 2016. "Agricultural anaerobic digestion plants: What LCA studies pointed out and what can be done to make them more environmentally sustainable," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 669-686.
    5. Ingrao, Carlo & Bacenetti, Jacopo & Adamczyk, Janusz & Ferrante, Valentina & Messineo, Antonio & Huisingh, Donald, 2019. "Investigating energy and environmental issues of agro-biogas derived energy systems: A comprehensive review of Life Cycle Assessments," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 296-307.
    6. Lijó, Lucía & González-García, Sara & Bacenetti, Jacopo & Moreira, Maria Teresa, 2017. "The environmental effect of substituting energy crops for food waste as feedstock for biogas production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 1130-1143.
    7. Milutinović, Biljana & Stefanović, Gordana & Đekić, Petar S. & Mijailović, Ivan & Tomić, Mladen, 2017. "Environmental assessment of waste management scenarios with energy recovery using life cycle assessment and multi-criteria analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 917-926.
    8. Auburger, Sebastian & Jacobs, Anna & Märländer, Bernward & Bahrs, Enno, 2016. "Economic optimization of feedstock mix for energy production with biogas technology in Germany with a special focus on sugar beets – Effects on greenhouse gas emissions and energy balances," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 1-11.
    9. Maria Anna Cusenza & Maurizio Cellura & Francesco Guarino & Sonia Longo, 2021. "Life Cycle Environmental Assessment of Energy Valorization of the Residual Agro-Food Industry," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-16, September.
    10. Yasmin, Nazia & Grundmann, Philipp, 2019. "Adoption and diffusion of renewable energy – The case of biogas as alternative fuel for cooking in Pakistan," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 255-264.
    11. Shuijing Wang & Chenming Xu & Liyan Song & Jin Zhang, 2022. "Anaerobic Digestion of Food Waste and Its Microbial Consortia: A Historical Review and Future Perspectives," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-21, August.
    12. Soam, Shveta & Kumar, Ravindra & Gupta, Ravi P. & Sharma, Pankaj K. & Tuli, Deepak K. & Das, Biswapriya, 2015. "Life cycle assessment of fuel ethanol from sugarcane molasses in northern and western India and its impact on Indian biofuel programme," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 307-315.
    13. Abdulhalim Abdulrazik & Roziah Zailan & Marwen Elkamel & Ali Elkamel, 2022. "Multi-Product Productions from Malaysian Oil Palm Empty Fruit Bunch (EFB): Selection for Optimal Process and Transportation Mode," Resources, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-31, July.
    14. Ascher, Simon & Watson, Ian & Wang, Xiaonan & You, Siming, 2019. "Township-based bioenergy systems for distributed energy supply and efficient household waste re-utilisation: Techno-economic and environmental feasibility," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 455-467.
    15. Bahlawan, Hilal & Morini, Mirko & Pinelli, Michele & Poganietz, Witold-Roger & Spina, Pier Ruggero & Venturini, Mauro, 2019. "Optimization of a hybrid energy plant by integrating the cumulative energy demand," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 253(C), pages 1-1.
    16. Eleanor Eaton & Alistair Hunt & Anastasia Di Leo & Daniel Black & Gwen Frost & Sarah Hargreaves, 2022. "What Are the Environmental Benefits and Costs of Reducing Food Waste? Bristol as a Case Study in the WASTE FEW Urban Living Lab Project," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-22, May.
    17. Seljak, T. & Buffi, M. & Valera-Medina, A. & Chong, C.T. & Chiaramonti, D. & Katrašnik, T., 2020. "Bioliquids and their use in power generation – A technology review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    18. Speirs, Jamie & Balcombe, Paul & Johnson, Erin & Martin, Jeanne & Brandon, Nigel & Hawkes, Adam, 2018. "A greener gas grid: What are the options," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 291-297.
    19. Zhao, Ning & You, Fengqi, 2019. "Dairy waste-to-energy incentive policy design using Stackelberg-game-based modeling and optimization," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(C).
    20. Xu, Fuqing & Okopi, Solomon Inalegwu & Jiang, Yongmei & Chen, Zhou & Meng, Liyun & Li, Yebo & Sun, Weimin & Li, Chaokun, 2022. "Multi-criteria assessment of food waste and waste paper anaerobic co-digestion: Effects of inoculation ratio, total solids content, and feedstock composition," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 40-50.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Draw solute; Techno-economic evaluation; Forward osmosis (FO); Anaerobic membrane bioreactor (AnMBR); Anaerobic digestionReverse osmosis (RO);
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03709623. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.