IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-03633813.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Origin and historical development of legitimacy
[Origine et développement historique de la légitimité]

Author

Listed:
  • Sylvaine Castellano

    (Métis Lab EM Normandie - EM Normandie - École de Management de Normandie)

Abstract

Legitimacy is a multidimensional concept of great importnce for firms, especially when considering the environmental context. Its multidimensionality is based on the diversity of the audiences that confer it and on the different layers of the environment in which the firm operates. Each audience forms its own expectations and each level of the environment has its legitimacy dynamic. The main objectif of this article is to study the historical foundations of legitimacy that have led, different perspectives, and different pillars of legitimacy that are commonly accepted in the academic world, with a focus on the neo-institutional approach.

Suggested Citation

  • Sylvaine Castellano, 2022. "Origin and historical development of legitimacy [Origine et développement historique de la légitimité]," Post-Print hal-03633813, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03633813
    DOI: 10.34699/rido.2022.6
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://normandie-univ.hal.science/hal-03633813
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://normandie-univ.hal.science/hal-03633813/document
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.34699/rido.2022.6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Delmar, Frederic & Shane, Scott, 2004. "Legitimating first: organizing activities and the survival of new ventures," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 19(3), pages 385-410, May.
    2. M. Tina Dacin & Christine Oliver & Jean‐Paul Roy, 2007. "The legitimacy of strategic alliances: an institutional perspective," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(2), pages 169-187, February.
    3. David L. Deephouse & Suzanne M. Carter, 2005. "An Examination of Differences Between Organizational Legitimacy and Organizational Reputation," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(2), pages 329-360, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sylvaine Castellano & Insaf Khelladi, 2016. "How French Wine Producers Use Open Innovation to Gain and Manage Their Legitimacy," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 7(1), pages 155-171, March.
    2. Fisher, Greg & Kuratko, Donald F. & Bloodgood, James M. & Hornsby, Jeffrey S., 2017. "Legitimate to whom? The challenge of audience diversity and new venture legitimacy," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 52-71.
    3. Aranda Gutierrez, Ana, 2016. "Thank you for (not) smoking : Essays on organizational theory and strategy in a contested industry," Other publications TiSEM ec7e4803-0702-496c-8b36-8, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    4. Xiaojun Du & Fei Feng & Wei Lv, 2022. "Bibliometric Overview of Organizational Legitimacy Research," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, May.
    5. Guo, Hai & Xu, Erming & Jacobs, Mark, 2014. "Managerial political ties and firm performance during institutional transitions: An analysis of mediating mechanisms," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(2), pages 116-127.
    6. Pamela S. Tolbert & Robert J. David & Wesley D. Sine, 2011. "Studying Choice and Change: The Intersection of Institutional Theory and Entrepreneurship Research," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(5), pages 1332-1344, October.
    7. Truong, Yann & Berrone, Pascual, 2022. "Can environmental innovation be a conventional source of higher market valuation?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 113-121.
    8. Olga Ivanova Ruffo & Kamel Mnisri & Christine Morin-Esteves & Corinne Gendron, 2020. "Judgements of SMEs’ Legitimacy and Its Sources," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 165(3), pages 395-410, September.
    9. Hai Guo & Jintong Tang & Zhongfeng Su, 2014. "To be different, or to be the same? The interactive effect of organizational regulatory legitimacy and entrepreneurial orientation on new venture performance," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 31(3), pages 665-685, September.
    10. Zhang, Hongjuan & Young, Michael N. & Tan, Justin & Sun, Weizheng, 2018. "How Chinese companies deal with a legitimacy imbalance when acquiring firms from developed economies," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 53(5), pages 752-767.
    11. Wafa N. Almobaireek & Ahmed A. Alshumaimeri & Tatiana S. Manolova, 2016. "Building entrepreneurial inter-firm networks in an emerging economy: the role of cognitive legitimacy," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 87-114, March.
    12. Donbesuur, Francis & Hultman, Magnus & Oghazi, Pejvak & Boso, Nathaniel, 2022. "External knowledge resources and new venture success in developing economies: Leveraging innovative opportunities and legitimacy strategies," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    13. Sylvaine Castellano & Insaf Khelladi, 2016. "How French Wine Producers Use Open Innovation to Gain and Manage Their Legitimacy," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 7(1), pages 155-171, March.
    14. Anna Lamin & Srilata Zaheer, 2012. "Wall Street vs. Main Street: Firm Strategies for Defending Legitimacy and Their Impact on Different Stakeholders," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 23(1), pages 47-66, February.
    15. Ranjani Krishnan & Michelle H. Yetman, 2011. "Institutional Drivers of Reporting Decisions in Nonprofit Hospitals," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(4), pages 1001-1039, September.
    16. Siegrun Brink, 2009. "Bedeutung der VC-Finanzierung für die Legitimierung junger Unternehmen - Ergebnisse einer empirischen Studie," Schumpeter Discussion Papers sdp09010, Universitätsbibliothek Wuppertal, University Library.
    17. Xuemei Xie & Jiuchang Lv, 2018. "Female technology entrepreneurs: resource shortages and reputation challenges – a view of institutional support," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 379-403, June.
    18. Pi-Hui Chung, 2020. "How Does Partner Selection Affect IPO Performance?," Advances in Management and Applied Economics, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 10(4), pages 1-5.
    19. Ilhan-Nas, Tulay & Okan, Tarhan & Tatoglu, Ekrem & Demirbag, Mehmet & Wood, Geoffrey & Glaister, Keith W., 2018. "Board composition, family ownership, institutional distance and the foreign equity ownership strategies of Turkish MNEs," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 53(6), pages 862-879.
    20. Murphy Patrick J. & Pollack Jeff & Nagy Brian & Rutherford Matthew & Coombes Susan, 2019. "Risk Tolerance, Legitimacy, and Perspective: Navigating Biases in Social Enterprise Evaluations," Entrepreneurship Research Journal, De Gruyter, vol. 9(4), pages 1-19, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Neo-institutional approach; History; Legitimacy; Légitimité; Approche néo-institutionnelle; Histoire;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03633813. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.