IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-03403311.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Social sustainability: from SDGs to policies

Author

Listed:
  • Guillaume Allegre

    (OFCE - Observatoire français des conjonctures économiques (Sciences Po) - Sciences Po - Sciences Po)

Abstract

On 25 September 2015, 193 UN Member States adopted the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) for 2030. The SDGs define multiple aims: well-being, poverty, health, education, gender equality, decent work, economic growth, reduction of inequalities, innovation, infrastructure investment, inclusive cities, clean water, clean energy, preserving biodiversity, climate change, peace, justice and strong institutions. For their advocates, the SDGs represent a major shift from the Millennium Development Goals adopted in 2000, in terms of ambition, elaboration and policy making. However, with such a long list of objectives it's hard to identify priorities, trade-offs and synergies among different goals. Well-designed policies can build synergies to simultaneously achieve better social protection, lower unemployment and better working conditions. The Nordic model is an example of success in this regard. The unemployment rate has returned to its pre-crisis level in the EU but significant differences persist between countries. In particular, the unemployment rate remains well above its pre-crisis level in Greece, Spain and Italy. Moreover, the material well-being of the poorest 10 percent did not improve between 2008 and 2018, even in countries where unemployment has not increased. Beyond the recovery of employment, there is a need for justice and social sustainability. Inequalities can be reduced through social transfers. Social transfers are not necessarily bad for growth and jobs. In addition, equal access to high-quality public goods at low cost is an important way of promoting social cohesion and reducing inequalities. In particular, spending on social investment (education, health, housing) is linked to lower unemployment rates. Social investment reduces income inequality without damaging employment. It is also necessary to mitigate primary inequalities. Higher wages and a lower dispersion of primary income are also elements for reducing poverty and income inequality. Governments and the EU should promote stronger forms of coordinated wage-setting rather than implementing policies that limit the coverage of collective bargaining. In the end, the SDGs have too many goals to be able to be efficiently tracked. It is important to highlight the trade-offs between the different goals and their interrelationship. Policy makers should implement policies that reduce poverty, inequality and unemployment simultaneously. In the short run, social transfers may play that role while social investments would reduce inequalities without adverse effects on employment in the long run.

Suggested Citation

  • Guillaume Allegre, 2019. "Social sustainability: from SDGs to policies," Post-Print hal-03403311, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03403311
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://sciencespo.hal.science/hal-03403311
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://sciencespo.hal.science/hal-03403311/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Roy van der Weide & Branko Milanovic, 2018. "Inequality is Bad for Growth of the Poor (but Not for That of the Rich)," The World Bank Economic Review, World Bank, vol. 32(3), pages 507-530.
    2. Guillaume Allègre & Julien Pellefigue, 2018. "Quel rôle peut jouer l’Europe dans l’imposition des multinationales ?," Revue de l'OFCE, Presses de Sciences-Po, vol. 0(4), pages 331-358.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gutiérrez-Romero, Roxana & Ahamed, Mostak, 2021. "COVID-19 response needs to broaden financial inclusion to curb the rise in poverty," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    2. Nasfi Fkili Wahiba & Mahmoudi Dina, 2023. "Technological Change, Growth and Income Inequality," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 13(1), pages 121-131, January.
    3. Monasterolo, Irene & Raberto, Marco, 2018. "The EIRIN Flow-of-funds Behavioural Model of Green Fiscal Policies and Green Sovereign Bonds," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 228-243.
    4. Li, Y. & Murshed, S.M. & Papyrakis, E., 2021. "Public capital and income inequality: some empirical evidence," ISS Working Papers - General Series 677, International Institute of Social Studies of Erasmus University Rotterdam (ISS), The Hague.
    5. Arsenio M. Balisacan, 2019. "Toward a fairer society: inequality and competition policy in developing Asia," Philippine Review of Economics, University of the Philippines School of Economics and Philippine Economic Society, vol. 56(1 and 2), pages 127-146, June and .
    6. Christian-Lambert Lambert Nguena & Prince Piva Asaloko, 2023. "Financial inclusion, growth and poverty: Evidence from Africa in COVID-19 era [Inclusion financière, croissance et pauvreté à l'ère de la Covid-19 en Afrique]," Post-Print hal-04150097, HAL.
    7. Guido Neidhöfer & Matías Ciaschi & Leonardo Gasparini & Joaquín Serrano, 2021. "Social Mobility and Economic Development: Evidence from a Panel of Latin American Regions," CEDLAS, Working Papers 0286, CEDLAS, Universidad Nacional de La Plata.
    8. Guido Neidhöfer & Matías Ciaschi & Leonardo Gasparini & Joaquín Serrano, 2024. "Social mobility and economic development," Journal of Economic Growth, Springer, vol. 29(2), pages 327-359, June.
    9. Santiago-Caballero, Carlos & Fernández-Roldán Díaz, Alejandro, 2017. "Decomposing competitive balance in the major European football leagues : a Rawlsian approach," IFCS - Working Papers in Economic History.WH 24658, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Instituto Figuerola.
    10. Mostak Ahamed & Roxana Guti'errez-Romero, 2020. "COVID-19 response needs to broaden financial inclusion to curb the rise in poverty," Papers 2006.10706, arXiv.org.
    11. Raymundo M. Campos Vázquez & Luis A. Monroy-Gómez-Franco, 2016. "La relación entre crecimiento económico y pobreza en México," Serie documentos de trabajo del Centro de Estudios Económicos 2016-01, El Colegio de México, Centro de Estudios Económicos.
    12. Flaviana Palmisano & Ida Petrillo, 2022. "A general rank‐dependent approach for distributional comparisons," Journal of Public Economic Theory, Association for Public Economic Theory, vol. 24(2), pages 380-409, April.
    13. Marco Ranaldi, 2022. "Income Composition Inequality," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 68(1), pages 139-160, March.
    14. Milanovic, Branko, 2016. "Why might the rich be indifferent to income growth of their own countries?," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 108-111.
    15. Ms. Valerie Cerra & Mr. Ruy Lama & Norman Loayza, 2021. "Links Between Growth, Inequality, and Poverty: A Survey," IMF Working Papers 2021/068, International Monetary Fund.
    16. Flaviana Palmisano & Ida Petrillo, 2021. "A general rank-dependent approach for distributional comparisons," Working Papers 567, ECINEQ, Society for the Study of Economic Inequality.
    17. Bittencourt, Manoel & Chang, Shinhye & Gupta, Rangan & Miller, Stephen M., 2019. "Does financial development affect income inequality in the U.S. States?," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 41(6), pages 1043-1056.
    18. Marrero,Gustavo Alberto & Rodríguez,Juan Gabriel & Van Der Weide,Roy, 2021. "Does Race and Gender Inequality Impact Income Growth ?," Policy Research Working Paper Series 9865, The World Bank.
    19. Malte Dold & Tim Krieger, 2019. "The “New” Crisis of the Liberal Order: Populism, Socioeconomic Imbalances, and the Response of Contemporary Ordoliberalism," Journal of Contextual Economics (JCE) – Schmollers Jahrbuch, Duncker & Humblot, Berlin, vol. 139(2–4), pages 243-258.
    20. Ararat, Melsa & Claessens, Stijn & Yurtoglu, B. Burcin, 2021. "Corporate governance in emerging markets: A selective review and an agenda for future research," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 48(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03403311. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.