IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-02534098.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Implantation d'un établissement culturel et innovations d'un écosystème territorial à orientation touristique : le cas du Louvre-Lens

Author

Listed:
  • Aude Ducroquet

    (GRANEM - Groupe de Recherche Angevin en Economie et Management - UA - Université d'Angers - AGROCAMPUS OUEST - Institut National de l'Horticulture et du Paysage)

  • Pierre Louart

    (IAE Lille - IAE Lille University School of Management - Lille - Université de Lille)

Abstract

Pour sortir de crise l'ancien bassin minier du Nord-Pas de Calais, des acteurs locaux profitent de l'implantation d'un établissement culturel prestigieux (le Louvre-Lens). Ils veulent développer le tourisme, et transformer le territoire en écosystème innovant. Afin d'y parvenir ils se servent d'actions collectives et de dispositifs structurants qui fonctionnent comme des leviers d'activation. Après sept ans, certains effets sont visibles et prometteurs. Mais il existe encore des freins, des tensions et des blocages que les théories sur les écosystèmes et l'intermédiation permettent d'expliquer. Ces théories offrent aussi des solutions potentielles pour améliorer le processus en cours et augmenter le potentiel touristique du territoire.

Suggested Citation

  • Aude Ducroquet & Pierre Louart, 2019. "Implantation d'un établissement culturel et innovations d'un écosystème territorial à orientation touristique : le cas du Louvre-Lens," Post-Print hal-02534098, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02534098
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-02534098
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-02534098/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pascal Le Masson & Benoit Weil & Armand Hatchuel, 2006. "Les processus d'innovation," Post-Print hal-00830210, HAL.
    2. André Torre, 2009. "Retour sur la notion de Proximité Géographique," Géographie, économie, société, Lavoisier, vol. 11(1), pages 63-75.
    3. Ron Adner & Rahul Kapoor, 2010. "Value creation in innovation ecosystems: how the structure of technological interdependence affects firm performance in new technology generations," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(3), pages 306-333, March.
    4. Ariel Mendez, 2010. "Processus. Concepts et méthode pour l'analyse temporelle en sciences sociales," Post-Print halshs-00486172, HAL.
    5. Ron Boschma, 2005. "Proximity and Innovation: A Critical Assessment," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(1), pages 61-74.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Véronique Favre-Bonté & Marie da Fonséca & Benoît Régent, 2021. "Comprendre les dynamiques collectives entrepreneuriales à travers les projets culturels de territoire," Post-Print hal-03891268, HAL.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marie-Claude Bélis-Bergouignan & Elie Brugarolas, 2010. "Building research and technology (R&T) transregional networks through an Interreg IIIB project," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 2(2), pages 135-155, November.
    2. Ben Letaifa, Soumaya & Rabeau, Yves, 2013. "Too close to collaborate? How geographic proximity could impede entrepreneurship and innovation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(10), pages 2071-2078.
    3. Charlie Karlsson & Börje Johansson & Kiyoshi Kobayashi & Roger R. Stough, 2014. "Knowledge, innovation and space: introduction," Chapters, in: Charlie Karlsson & Börje Johansson & Kiyoshi Kobayashi & Roger R. Stough (ed.), Knowledge, Innovation and Space, chapter 1, pages 1-26, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    4. Elisa Villani & Christian Lechner, 2019. "The emergence of an innovation ecosystem in a low innovation region: Disrupting inertia by a young university," BEMPS - Bozen Economics & Management Paper Series BEMPS63, Faculty of Economics and Management at the Free University of Bozen.
    5. Shi, Xianwei & Liang, Xingkun & Luo, Yining, 2023. "Unpacking the intellectual structure of ecosystem research in innovation studies," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(6).
    6. Hans Löfsten & Anders Isaksson & Heikki Rannikko, 2023. "Entrepreneurial networks, geographical proximity, and their relationship to firm growth: a study of 241 small high-tech firms," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 48(6), pages 2280-2306, December.
    7. Sylvain Amisse & Paul Muller & Caroline Hussler & Patrick Rondé, 2011. "Do birds of a feather flock together? Proximities and inter-clusters network," ERSA conference papers ersa11p1896, European Regional Science Association.
    8. Singh, Shiwangi & Dhir, Sanjay & Das, V. Mukunda & Sharma, Anuj, 2020. "Bibliometric overview of the Technological Forecasting and Social Change journal: Analysis from 1970 to 2018," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    9. Bastien Bernela & Rachel Levy, 2014. "Modalities of coordination inside innovative collaborative projects: between face-to-face interactions and interactions at a distance [Modalités de coordination de projets collaboratifs pour l'inno," Working Papers halshs-01085016, HAL.
    10. Basile Michel, 2018. "Emergence of entrepreneurial dynamics in coworking spaces for cultural and creative entrepreneurs [Émergence de dynamiques entrepreneuriales au sein d’espaces de coworking pour entrepreneurs cultur," Post-Print halshs-01905253, HAL.
    11. Dahesh, Mehran Badin & Tabarsa, Gholamali & Zandieh, Mostafa & Hamidizadeh, Mohammadreza, 2020. "Reviewing the intellectual structure and evolution of the innovation systems approach: A social network analysis," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    12. João Lopes & Mário Franco, 2019. "Review About Regional Development Networks: an Ecosystem Model Proposal," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 10(1), pages 275-297, March.
    13. Damien Talbot & Sandra Charreire-Petit & Alexis Pokrovsky, 2020. "La proximité comme perception de la distance. Le cas de la télémédecine," Revue française de gestion, Lavoisier, vol. 0(4), pages 51-74.
    14. Karlsson, Charlie & Johansson, Börje & Kobayashi, Kiyoshi & Stough, Roger R., 2014. "Knowledge, innovation and space," Working Paper Series in Economics and Institutions of Innovation 367, Royal Institute of Technology, CESIS - Centre of Excellence for Science and Innovation Studies.
    15. Solène Chesnel & Jérémie Molho & Florian Raimbeau & Hélène Morteau & Dominique Sagot-Duvauroux, 2013. "Les clusters ou districts industriels du domaine culturel et médiatique : revue du savoir économique et questionnement," Working Papers hal-02502563, HAL.
    16. André Torre & Damien Talbot, 2018. "Proximités : retour sur 25 années d’analyse," Revue d'économie régionale et urbaine, Armand Colin, vol. 0(5), pages 917-936.
    17. Ng, Wei Keat Benny & Appel-Meulenbroek, Rianne & Cloodt, Myriam & Arentze, Theo, 2022. "Exploring science park location choice: A stated choice experiment among Dutch technology-based firms," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    18. Lorenzo Ciapetti, 2011. "Technological Change, Knowledge Integration and Adaptive Processes: The Mechatronic Evolution of the Reggio Emilia District," Chapters, in: Paul L. Robertson & David Jacobson (ed.), Knowledge Transfer and Technology Diffusion, chapter 5, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    19. Vinko Muštra & Blanka Šimundić & Zvonimir Kuliš, 2020. "Does innovation matter for regional labour resilience? The case of EU regions," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 12(5), pages 955-970, October.
    20. Amélie Loriot & Valérie Guillard & Fabrice Larceneux & Jean-Philippe Bertocchio, 2024. "Patients’ Representations of Perceived Distance and Proximity to Telehealth in France: Qualitative Study," Post-Print hal-04442039, HAL.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02534098. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.