IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-02392210.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The economics of non-GMO segregation

Author

Listed:
  • David S. Bullock

    (University of Illinois System)

  • Marion Desquilbet

    (Unité d'économie et sociologie rurales de rennes - INRA - Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique)

  • Elisavet Nitsi

    (Centre of Planning and Economic Research)

Abstract

Cet article, synthèse d'un document de recherche, examine les coûts liés à la ségrégation d'une filière avec OGM (organismes génétiquement modifiés) et d'une filière non OGM à identité préservée aux Etats-Unis. Ces coûts sont étudiés pour les semenciers, les agriculteurs, les organismes stockeurs et les transformateurs. Il semble qu'un coût important de ségrégation provient d'une perte de flexibilité dans l'utilisation des équipements de stockage, collecte, transport et transformation, qui doivent maintenir séparés les produits des deux filières. Malgré ces coûts, l'ajustement de l'infrastructure de collecte, stockage et transformation sera graduel et lent, en raison des coûts fixes élevés. Les auteurs examinent également les coûts pour contrôler la pollinisation croisée dans le cas du maïs et les coûts des tests de détection du contenu OGM. L'importance cruciale des seuils de tolérance (contenu OGM autorisé dans les produits non OGM) pour les coûts de ségrégation est soulignée.

Suggested Citation

  • David S. Bullock & Marion Desquilbet & Elisavet Nitsi, 2001. "The economics of non-GMO segregation," Post-Print hal-02392210, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02392210
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. D.S. Bullock, 2001. "Who pays the costs of non-GMO segregation and identity preservation ?," Post-Print hal-02283458, HAL.
    2. Mario F. Teisl & Julie A. Caswell, 2003. "Information Policy and Genetically Modified Food: Weighting the Benefits and Costs," QA - Rivista dell'Associazione Rossi-Doria, Associazione Rossi Doria, issue 4, March.
    3. Marion Desquilbet & David S. Bullock, 2003. "Who Pays the Costs of Non-GMO Segregation and Identity Preservation?," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 91(3), pages 656-672.
    4. Antonio Seccia & Antonio Stasi & Luigi Roselli, 2006. "Atteggiamento dei consumatori nei confronti dell'evoluzione del sistema agro-alimentare: l'introduzione di alimenti geneticamente modificati," Economia agro-alimentare, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 10(1).
    5. Parcell, Joseph L., 2002. "Emerging Ip Markets: The Tokyo Grain Exchange Non-Gmo Soybean Contract," Working Papers 26038, University of Missouri Columbia, Department of Agricultural Economics.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02392210. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.