IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-02116122.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Safety Culture in a Complex Mix of Safety Models: Are We Missing the Point?

Author

Listed:
  • Corinne Bieder

    (ENAC - Ecole Nationale de l'Aviation Civile)

Abstract

Safety culture is often considered as being the role given to safety in the trade-offs made within an organization. But what is the scope of these trade-offs? If operational activities at the sharp end are naturally included in the safety culture perimeter, other trade-offs are made that structure operational activities, especially through the development of processes, procedures, organizational structure and policies but also through technological choices. These trade-offs are made within the environment of the organization, and that inevitably induces constraints on the role given to safety, as there are already trade-offs inherited from this environment. Likewise, a variety of safety models exist in this environment, in the sense of assumptions or beliefs as to how safety is ensured or more often is to be ensured. Eventually, each organization combines a mix of safety models, some partly conflicting with others. To what extent is an organization aware of the complexity of operations and of what it takes to operate safely? Is this also part of its safety culture? To what extent and how can this complexity be addressed? These are some of the questions addressed in the paper.

Suggested Citation

  • Corinne Bieder, 2018. "Safety Culture in a Complex Mix of Safety Models: Are We Missing the Point?," Post-Print hal-02116122, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02116122
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-95129-4_11
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://enac.hal.science/hal-02116122
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://enac.hal.science/hal-02116122/document
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/978-3-319-95129-4_11?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John S. Carroll, 1998. "Organizational Learning Activities in High‐hazard Industries: The Logics Underlying Self‐Analysis," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(6), pages 699-717, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Małgorzata Jasiulewicz-Kaczmarek & Katarzyna Antosz & Ryszard Wyczółkowski & Małgorzata Sławińska, 2022. "Integrated Approach for Safety Culture Factor Evaluation from a Sustainability Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-30, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhaleh Abdi & Hamid Ravaghi, 2017. "Implementing root cause analysis in Iranian hospitals: challenges and benefits," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(2), pages 147-162, April.
    2. Mavis Agyemang Opoku & Suk Bong Choi & Seung-Wan Kang, 2019. "Psychological Safety in Ghana: Empirical Analyses of Antecedents and Consequences," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-20, December.
    3. Zvi Stern & Tal Katz-Navon & Eitan Naveh, 2008. "The Influence of Situational Learning Orientation, Autonomy, and Voice on Error Making: The Case of Resident Physicians," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 54(9), pages 1553-1564, September.
    4. Nicolini, Davide & Waring, Justin & Mengis, Jeanne, 2011. "Policy and practice in the use of root cause analysis to investigate clinical adverse events: Mind the gap," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 73(2), pages 217-225, July.
    5. Agulles, Remei & Prats, Mª Julia, 2011. "Learning in practice: What organizational and management literature can contribute to professional and occupational development," IESE Research Papers D/938, IESE Business School.
    6. Manisaligil, Alperen & Gölgeci, İsmail & Bakker, Arnold B. & Faruk Aysan, Ahmet & Babacan, Mehmet & Gür, Nurullah, 2023. "Understanding change in disruptive contexts: The role of the time paradox and locus of control," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    7. Peter M. Madsen, 2009. "These Lives Will Not Be Lost in Vain: Organizational Learning from Disaster in U.S. Coal Mining," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 20(5), pages 861-875, October.
    8. Gabriel Szulanski & Rossella Cappetta & Robert J. Jensen, 2004. "When and How Trustworthiness Matters: Knowledge Transfer and the Moderating Effect of Causal Ambiguity," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 15(5), pages 600-613, October.
    9. Rudolph, Jenny & Hatakenaka, Sachi & Carroll, John S., 2002. "Organizational Learning from Experience in High-Hazard Industries: Problem Investigation as Off-Line Reflective Practice," Working papers 4359-02, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Sloan School of Management.
    10. Catherine H. Tinsley & Robin L. Dillon & Matthew A. Cronin, 2012. "How Near-Miss Events Amplify or Attenuate Risky Decision Making," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 58(9), pages 1596-1613, September.
    11. Tafara Mlambo & Davison Maunganidze, 2024. "Zimbabwe’s Preparedness in Aviation Disasters Management: A Case Study of Robert Gabriel Mugabe International Airport (RGMIA)," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 8(8), pages 967-982, August.
    12. Hung-Chung Su, 2017. "The impact of mindful organizing on operational performance: An explorative study," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 10(3), pages 148-157, December.
    13. Carroll, John S. & Rudolph, Jenny W. & Hatakenaka, Sachi, 2002. "Problem Investigation in High-Hazard Industries: Creating and Negotiational Learning," Working papers 4360-02, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Sloan School of Management.
    14. Deborah Dougherty, 2001. "Reimagining the Differentiation and Integration of Work for Sustained Product Innovation," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 12(5), pages 612-631, October.
    15. Homsma, Gert J. & Van Dyck, Cathy & De Gilder, Dick & Koopman, Paul L. & Elfring, Tom, 2009. "Learning from error: The influence of error incident characteristics," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 62(1), pages 115-122, January.
    16. Hatakenaka, Sachi & Rudolph, Jenny & Carroll, John S., 2002. "Problem Investigation in High-Hazard Industries: Creating and Negotiational Learning," Working papers 4360-02, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Sloan School of Management.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02116122. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.