IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-02008205.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

La similarité en marketing : périmètre, mesure et champs d'application

Author

Listed:
  • Christophe Bèzes

    (ISTEC - Institut supérieur des Sciences, Techniques et Economie Commerciales - ISTEC)

  • M. Mercanti-Guerin

    (DICEN-IDF - Dispositifs d'Information et de Communication à l'Ère du Numérique - Paris Île-de-France - UPN - Université Paris Nanterre - CNAM - Conservatoire National des Arts et Métiers [CNAM] - UPEM - Université Paris-Est Marne-la-Vallée)

Abstract

Le concept de similarité est central dans la recherche en marketing. Ses domaines d'applications sont très variés. Pourtant, ce concept plus complexe qu'il ne paraît, reste encore méconnu. Il doit être distingué d'autres concepts très proches comme la similitude, la différence, le fit et la congruence. Cet article montre que le type de similarité utilisé (littérale ou relationnelle) a des conséquences différentes sur les processus cognitifs des consommateurs. Ceci peut modifier radicalement les résultats d'une expérimentation. Il en va de même du type de mesure utilisée.

Suggested Citation

  • Christophe Bèzes & M. Mercanti-Guerin, 2017. "La similarité en marketing : périmètre, mesure et champs d'application," Post-Print hal-02008205, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02008205
    DOI: 10.1177/0767370116653551
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-02008205
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-02008205/document
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0767370116653551?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Frenkel Ter Hofstede & Michel Wedel & Jan-Benedict E.M. Steenkamp, 2002. "Identifying Spatial Segments in International Markets," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 21(2), pages 160-177, July.
    2. Huifang Mao & Babu John Mariadoss & Raj Echambadi & Pavan Chennamaneni, 2012. "Brand extensions via complements or substitutes: The moderating role of manufacturing transferability," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 279-292, March.
    3. Meyers-Levy, Joan & Tybout, Alice M, 1989. "Schema Congruity as a Basis for Product Evaluation," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 16(1), pages 39-54, June.
    4. P. Aurier, 1993. "Analyse de la structure des marchés Le point sur les modèles," Post-Print hal-02015317, HAL.
    5. Lan Jiang & Joandrea Hoegg & Darren W. Dahl & Amitava Chattopadhyay, 2010. "The Persuasive Role of Incidental Similarity on Attitudes and Purchase Intentions in a Sales Context," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 36(5), pages 778-791, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Maria Mercanti-Guerin & Christel de Lassus & Christophe Bezes, 2021. "Quand L'Experientiel En Luxe Se Construit Sur Instagram : Synergie Ou Bataille Entre Marques Et Directeurs Artistiques ?," Post-Print hal-04072273, HAL.
    2. Maria Mercanti-Guérin & Christel de Lassus & Christophe Bezes, 2021. "Quand l'expérientiel en luxe se construit sur Instagram : Synergie ou bataille entre marques et directeurs artistiques ?," Post-Print hal-03264508, HAL.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Christophe Bezes & Maria Mercanti-Guérin, 2017. "Similarity in marketing: Scope, measurement, and fields of application [La similarité en marketing : périmètre, mesure et champs d'application]," Post-Print hal-02086666, HAL.
    2. Shaheer, Noman Ahmed & Li, Sali, 2020. "The CAGE around cyberspace? How digital innovations internationalize in a virtual world," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 35(1).
    3. Deng, Qian (Claire) & Messinger, Paul R., 2022. "Dimensions of brand-extension fit," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 764-787.
    4. James Agarwal & Wayne DeSarbo & Naresh K. Malhotra & Vithala Rao, 2015. "An Interdisciplinary Review of Research in Conjoint Analysis: Recent Developments and Directions for Future Research," Customer Needs and Solutions, Springer;Institute for Sustainable Innovation and Growth (iSIG), vol. 2(1), pages 19-40, March.
    5. Rik Pieters & Michel Wedel, 2012. "Ad Gist: Ad Communication in a Single Eye Fixation," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 31(1), pages 59-73, January.
    6. Elizabeth G. Pontikes & William P. Barnett, 2015. "The Persistence of Lenient Market Categories," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(5), pages 1415-1431, October.
    7. Bong-Goon Seo & Do-Hyung Park, 2020. "The Effective Type of Information Categorization in Online Curation Service Depending on Psychological Ownership," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-13, April.
    8. Garaus, Marion & Wagner, Udo & Manzinger, Sandra, 2017. "Happy grocery shopper: The creation of positive emotions through affective digital signage content," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 295-305.
    9. Nayga, Rodolfo M., Jr. & Shaw, W. Douglass & Silva, Andres, 2006. "The Effect of Risk Presentation on Product Valuation: An Experimental Analysis," 2006 Annual meeting, July 23-26, Long Beach, CA 21429, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    10. Yasir Ali Soomro & Muzzaffar Ali Issani & Shahzad Nasim, 2016. "Consumer Perceived Brand Concept & Close Brand Extension: A Multi-Mediation Model Analysis," IBT Journal of Business Studies (JBS), Ilma University, Faculty of Management Science, vol. 12(1), pages 347-359.
    11. Múgica, Jose M. & Vidal-Sanz, Jose M., 2006. "Do business density and variety determine retail performance?," DEE - Working Papers. Business Economics. WB wb065817, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Departamento de Economía de la Empresa.
    12. Sheng, Shibin & Pan, Yue, 2009. "Bundling as a new product introduction strategy: The role of brand image and bundle features," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 16(5), pages 367-376.
    13. Mourali, Mehdi & Nagpal, Anish, 2013. "The powerful select, the powerless reject: Power's influence in decision strategies," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(7), pages 874-880.
    14. Lieve Doucé, 2022. "The Effect of High, Partial, and Low Multisensory Congruity between Light and Scent on Consumer Evaluations and Approach Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-25, May.
    15. Chaudhuri, Arjun & Ligas, Mark, 2009. "Consequences of Value in Retail Markets," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 85(3), pages 406-419.
    16. Erkko Autio & Saurav Pathak & Karl Wennberg, 2013. "Consequences of cultural practices for entrepreneurial behaviors," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 44(4), pages 334-362, May.
    17. Braun-LaTour, Kathryn A. & Puccinelli, Nancy M. & Mast, Fred W., 2007. "Mood, information congruency, and overload," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 60(11), pages 1109-1116, November.
    18. Hunneman, Auke & Verhoef, Peter C. & Sloot, Laurens M., 2021. "The impact of hard discounter presence on store satisfaction and store loyalty," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    19. Khandeparkar, Kapil, 2014. "The role of complementarity and partner brand price level in new product introduction strategy using bundle offers: A study on the quality perception of bundle components," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 21(6), pages 992-1000.
    20. Haverila, Matti, 2011. "Mobile phone feature preferences, customer satisfaction and repurchase intent among male users," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 19(4), pages 238-246.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02008205. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.