IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-01935634.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Sustaining performance in turbulent times: Identifying, developing, and expanding core activities

Author

Listed:
  • Isabelle Piot-Lepetit

    (UMR MOISA - Marchés, Organisations, Institutions et Stratégies d'Acteurs - Cirad - Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement - INRA - Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique - Montpellier SupAgro - Centre international d'études supérieures en sciences agronomiques - CIHEAM-IAMM - Centre International de Hautes Etudes Agronomiques Méditerranéennes - Institut Agronomique Méditerranéen de Montpellier - CIHEAM - Centre International de Hautes Études Agronomiques Méditerranéennes - Montpellier SupAgro - Institut national d’études supérieures agronomiques de Montpellier)

Abstract

Based on the assumption that it is quite impossible to manage what we do not know and cannot measure, this paper develops meaningful metrics, helping drive organizational performance, so as to make informed decisions. The analytical framework described hereafter allows the measurement of both the positioning and sustainability of different units within the same organization, as illustrated in our case study, but can also be implemented to assess the competitive advantage of a company over its competitors. The concept of positioning focuses on measuring unit performance and benchmarking it, so as to rank units as best, good, or low performers. The concept of sustainability considers the dynamic of performance over time and ranks it as eroded, improved, or maintained. Based on these two measures, it is then possible to provide specific recommendations for each unit regarding the improvement of its performance. Using data to support decision making and foster development is valuable only if the primary purpose of such analytics remains the improvement of the way organizations do business, by providing quantitative techniques that help solve business problems correctly and achieve business impact. To do this, analytics has to be built upon business priorities and more explicitly business rules. However, it is the most effective and timely way to provide relevant prescriptions based on available data regarding the course of action that aims at improving organization's performance. Working with business rules means the adoption of a process orientation to better understand the tasks that comprise a business model and investigates the performance of the overall process and its components. Having a process approach facilitates the presentation of organizational priorities by identifying core business activities and developing and expanding those that contribute the most to the positioning and sustainability of each unit. The use of quantitative analytics helps in identifying the areas that are or are not performing well and focusing on those that sustain performance, especially in difficult times. Indeed, if each unit is profitable in its main activities, a business impact can be expected that benefits the organization as well.

Suggested Citation

  • Isabelle Piot-Lepetit, 2018. "Sustaining performance in turbulent times: Identifying, developing, and expanding core activities," Post-Print hal-01935634, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01935634
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-01935634
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-01935634/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Piot-Lepetit, Isabelle & Nzongang, Joseph, 2014. "Financial sustainability and poverty outreach within a network of village banks in Cameroon: A multi-DEA approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 234(1), pages 319-330.
    2. Isabelle Piot-Lepetit & Joseph Nzongang, 2014. "Financial sustainability and poverty outreach within a network of village banks in Cameroon: A multi DEA approach," Post-Print hal-02639487, HAL.
    3. Berger, Allen N. & DeYoung, Robert, 1997. "Problem loans and cost efficiency in commercial banks," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 21(6), pages 849-870, June.
    4. Mark Schreiner, 2002. "Aspects of outreach: a framework for discussion of the social benefits of microfinance," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 14(5), pages 591-603.
    5. Charnes, A. & Cooper, W. W. & Rhodes, E., 1978. "Measuring the efficiency of decision making units," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 2(6), pages 429-444, November.
    6. Matthew J. Liberatore & Wenhong Luo, 2010. "The Analytics Movement: Implications for Operations Research," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 40(4), pages 313-324, August.
    7. Luoma, Jukka, 2016. "Model-based organizational decision making: A behavioral lens," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 249(3), pages 816-826.
    8. Seelos, Christian & Mair, Johanna, 2005. "Social entrepreneurship: Creating new business models to serve the poor," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 48(3), pages 241-246.
    9. B Gutiérrez-Nieto & C Serrano-Cinca & C Mar Molinero, 2009. "Social efficiency in microfinance institutions," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 60(1), pages 104-119, January.
    10. William W. Cooper & Lawrence M. Seiford & Kaoru Tone, 2007. "Data Envelopment Analysis," Springer Books, Springer, edition 0, number 978-0-387-45283-8, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Isabelle Piot-Lepetit & Joseph Nzongang, 2021. "Business analytics for managing performance of microfinance Institutions: A flexible management of the implementation process," Post-Print hal-03209188, HAL.
    2. Isabelle Piot-Lepetit & Joseph Nzongang, 2021. "Business Analytics for Managing Performance of Microfinance Institutions: A Flexible Management of the Implementation Process," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-22, April.
    3. Isabelle Piot-Lepetit & Joseph Nzongang, 2019. "Performance assessment and definition of improvement paths for microfinance institutions: An application to a network of village banks in Cameroon," Post-Print hal-02619461, HAL.
    4. Mahinda Wijesiri & Almudena Martínez-Campillo & Peter Wanke, 2019. "Is there a trade-off between social and financial performance of public commercial banks in India? A multi-activity DEA model with shared inputs and undesirable outputs," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 13(2), pages 417-442, April.
    5. Almudena Martínez-Campillo & Yolanda Fernández-Santos & María Pilar Sierra-Fernández, 2018. "How Well Have Social Economy Financial Institutions Performed During the Crisis Period? Exploring Financial and Social Efficiency in Spanish Credit Unions," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 151(2), pages 319-336, August.
    6. Almudena Martínez-Campillo & Yolanda Fernández-Santos, 2017. "What About the Social Efficiency in Credit Cooperatives? Evidence from Spain (2008–2014)," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 131(2), pages 607-629, March.
    7. Wijesiri, Mahinda & Yaron, Jacob & Meoli, Michele, 2017. "Assessing the financial and outreach efficiency of microfinance institutions: Do age and size matter?," Journal of Multinational Financial Management, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 63-76.
    8. Niels Hermes & Marek Hudon, 2018. "Determinants Of The Performance Of Microfinance Institutions: A Systematic Review," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(5), pages 1483-1513, December.
    9. Maxime LEBOVICS & Niels HERMES & Marek HUDON, 2016. "Are Financial And Social Efficiency Mutually Exclusive? A Case Study Of Vietnamese Microfinance Institutions," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 87(1), pages 55-77, December.
    10. Wijesiri, Mahinda & Meoli, Michele, 2015. "Productivity change of microfinance institutions in Kenya: A bootstrap Malmquist approach," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 115-121.
    11. Patrick Van Damme & Mahinda Wijesiri & Michele Meoli, 2016. "Governance and Efficiency of Microfinance Institutions," South Asia Economic Journal, Institute of Policy Studies of Sri Lanka, vol. 17(2), pages 236-247, September.
    12. Wijesiri, Mahinda & Viganò, Laura & Meoli, Michele, 2015. "Efficiency of microfinance institutions in Sri Lanka: a two-stage double bootstrap DEA approach," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 74-83.
    13. Wijesiri, Mahinda & Yaron, Jacob & Meoli, Michele, 2015. "Performance of microfinance institutions in achieving the poverty outreach and financial sustainability: When age and size matter?," MPRA Paper 69821, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. Fall, François & Akim, Al-mouksit & Wassongma, Harouna, 2018. "DEA and SFA research on the efficiency of microfinance institutions: A meta-analysis," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 176-188.
    15. Hermes, Cornelis & Hudon, M., 2018. "Determinants of the Performance of Microfinance Institutions: A Systematic Review," Research Report 2018008, University of Groningen, Research Institute SOM (Systems, Organisations and Management).
    16. Li, Lin Yang & Hermes, Niels & Meesters, Aljar, 2019. "Convergence of the performance of microfinance institutions: A decomposition analysis," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 308-324.
    17. Prabhjot Kaur, 2016. "Efficiency of Microfinance Institutions in India: Are They Reaching the Poorest of the Poor?," Vision, , vol. 20(1), pages 54-65, March.
    18. Mohsen Afsharian & Anna Kryvko & Peter Reichling, 2011. "Efficiency and Its Impact on the Performance of European Commercial Banks," FEMM Working Papers 110018, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Faculty of Economics and Management.
    19. Md Aslam Mia & Lucia Dalla Pellegrina & Cheng Zhang & Sunil Sangwan, 2022. "Efficiency Wage and Productivity in the Indian Microfinance Industry: A Panel Evidence," IIM Kozhikode Society & Management Review, , vol. 11(2), pages 235-252, July.
    20. Mia, Md Aslam & Ben Soltane, Bassem Ibrahim, 2016. "Productivity and its determinants in microfinance institutions (MFIs): Evidence from South Asian countries," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 32-45.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01935634. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.