IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-01599675.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

L'influence du type de conflit sur les modalités de résolution de conflits au sein de réseaux d'innovation

Author

Listed:
  • Elodie Gardet

    (IREGE - Institut de Recherche en Gestion et en Economie - USMB [Université de Savoie] [Université de Chambéry] - Université Savoie Mont Blanc)

  • Romain Gandia

    (INSEEC - INSEEC Alpes-Savoie - INSEEC - Institut des hautes études économiques et commerciales | School of Business and Economics)

Abstract

Cette recherche étudie l'influence du type de conflit sur les modalités de résolution utilisées par les membres d'un réseau d'innovation. L'analyse qualitative de six réseaux d'innovation met en évidence deux principaux résultats : (1) les conflits affectifs liés à la coopération entrainent des modalités plutôt radicales comme l'exclusion, alors que (2) les conflits cognitifs liés aux aspects techniques du projet sont plutôt résolus grâce à des discussions. Nos données révèlent également l'importance de la dépendance du pivot dans la manière de résoudre le conflit. This research investigates the influence of the type of conflict on resolution mechanisms used by innovation network members. Qualitative analysis of six innovation networks highlights two main results: (1) affective conflicts related to cooperation imply rather radical modalities as the exclusion, while (2) cognitive conflicts related to project' technical aspects are rather resolved through discussion. Our data also show that the dependence of the hub firm influences the way of resolving conflicts.

Suggested Citation

  • Elodie Gardet & Romain Gandia, 2014. "L'influence du type de conflit sur les modalités de résolution de conflits au sein de réseaux d'innovation," Post-Print hal-01599675, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01599675
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.univ-smb.fr/hal-01599675
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.univ-smb.fr/hal-01599675/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Malhotra, Deepak & Lumineau, Fabrice, 2011. "Trust and collaboration in the aftermath of conflict: the effects of contract structure," MPRA Paper 38358, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Jakki Mohr & Robert Spekman, 1994. "Characteristics of partnership success: Partnership attributes, communication behavior, and conflict resolution techniques," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 15(2), pages 135-152, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Oliver Schilke & Karen S. Cook, 2015. "Sources of alliance partner trustworthiness: Integrating calculative and relational perspectives," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(2), pages 276-297, February.
    2. Phuong Thi Minh Nguyen & Khuong Ngoc Mai & Phuong Ngoc Duy Nguyen, 2023. "Does Trust Affect Antecedents of Inter-Organizational Governance Mechanisms and Elicit Successful Collaboration via Innovation? An Empirical Study from a Market-Oriented Economy in Vietnam," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-27, June.
    3. Duplat, Valérie & Coeurderoy, Régis & Hagedoorn, John, 2018. "Contractual governance and the choice of dispute-resolution mechanisms: Evidence on technology licensing," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(6), pages 1096-1110.
    4. Zheng, Jinming & Lau, Patrick Wing Chung & Chen, Shushu & Dickson, Geoff & De Bosscher, Veerle & Peng, Qi, 2019. "Interorganisational conflict between national and provincial sport organisations within China’s elite sport system: Perspectives from national organisations," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 22(5), pages 667-681.
    5. Fabrice Lumineau & Joanne E. Oxley, 2012. "Let's Work It Out (or We'll See You in Court): Litigation and Private Dispute Resolution in Vertical Exchange Relationships," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 23(3), pages 820-834, June.
    6. Lumineau, Fabrice & Henderson, James, 2012. "The influence of relational experience and contractual governance on the negotiation strategy in buyer-supplier disputes," MPRA Paper 38510, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Sjauw-Koen-Fa, August R. & Blok, Vincent & Omta, S.W.F. (Onno), 2016. "Critical Success Factors for Smallholder Inclusion in High Value-Adding Supply Chains by Food & Agribusiness Multinational Enterprise," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 19(1), pages 1-30, February.
    8. Gallear, David & Ghobadian, Abby & Chen, Weifeng, 2012. "Corporate responsibility, supply chain partnership and performance: An empirical examination," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(1), pages 83-91.
    9. Changbyung Yoon & Keeeun Lee & Byungun Yoon & Omar Toulan, 2017. "Typology and Success Factors of Collaboration for Sustainable Growth in the IT Service Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-20, November.
    10. Matanda, Margaret Jekanyika & Freeman, Susan, 2009. "Effect of perceived environmental uncertainty on exporter-importer inter-organisational relationships and export performance improvement," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 89-107, February.
    11. Christine E. Meka & Lenny S. Bire Manoe & Yeheskial A. Roen, 2024. "Sociological Study on the Participation of Pentahelix Elements in the Reduction of Stunting in Oefafi Bethel Church, East Kupang District, Kupang Regency, East Nusa Tenggara Province," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 8(2), pages 225-230, February.
    12. Zur, Andrew & Leckie, Civilai & Webster, Cynthia M., 2012. "Cognitive and affective trust between Australian exporters and their overseas buyers," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 20(1), pages 73-79.
    13. Maria Ripollés & Andreu Blesa, 2020. "And yet, non-equity cooperative entries do improve international performance: uncovering the role of networks’ social capital," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 55(3), pages 761-776, October.
    14. Chatterjee, Sheshadri & Chaudhuri, Ranjan & Vrontis, Demetris, 2022. "Managing knowledge in Indian Organizations: An empirical investigation to examine the moderating role of jugaad," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 26-39.
    15. repec:rdg:wpaper:em-dp2004-16 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Artz, Kendall W. & Brush, Thomas H., 2000. "Asset specificity, uncertainty and relational norms: an examination of coordination costs in collaborative strategic alliances," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 41(4), pages 337-362, April.
    17. Baabdullah, Abdullah M. & Alalwan, Ali Abdallah & Algharabat, Raed S. & Metri, Bhimaraya & Rana, Nripendra P., 2022. "Virtual agents and flow experience: An empirical examination of AI-powered chatbots," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    18. Sander Hoogendoorn & Simon C. Parker & Mirjam van Praag, 2017. "Smart or Diverse Start-up Teams? Evidence from a Field Experiment," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 28(6), pages 1010-1028, December.
    19. Ghadimi, Pezhman & Ghassemi Toosi, Farshad & Heavey, Cathal, 2018. "A multi-agent systems approach for sustainable supplier selection and order allocation in a partnership supply chain," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 269(1), pages 286-301.
    20. Eva Mora-Valentín & Marta Ortiz-de-Urbina-Criado, 2009. "Improving the effectiveness of academic-business models: an analysis of obstacles in R&D activities in service industries," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 3(4), pages 395-413, December.
    21. Ellegaard, Chris & Andersen, Poul Houman, 2015. "The process of resolving severe conflict in buyer–supplier relationships," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(4), pages 457-470.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01599675. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.