IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-01348021.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

L’Algérie et l’OMC : je t’aime, moi non plus !

Author

Listed:
  • Myriam Donsimoni

    (PACTE - Pacte, Laboratoire de sciences sociales - UPMF - Université Pierre Mendès France - Grenoble 2 - UJF - Université Joseph Fourier - Grenoble 1 - IEPG - Sciences Po Grenoble - Institut d'études politiques de Grenoble - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

Abstract

L'Algérie constitue un cas d'école dans l'illustration de l'enfermement d'une économie ; c'est l'exemple, poussé à la caricature, d'un pays qui s'est condamné lui-même à la malédiction de la rente. Axée sur le pétrole et le gaz - qui demeurent encore aujourd'hui les principales sources d'énergie dans le monde – l'économie algérienne s'enlise. Tous les efforts que l'Algérie déploie depuis 1987 pour intégrer l'OMC ne suffisent pas ; le pays est au pied du mur. L'alternative qui s'offre à elle est la suivante : intégrer le commerce mondial dans sa configuration actuelle et affronter la concurrence et les coûts de transaction liés à l'adhésion à l'OMC ou prendre le temps de restructurer son économie et de la renforcer en dehors du secteur des hydrocarbures pour arriver plus forte sur la scène internationale. Autrement dit, alors qu'en mars 2014, l'OMC s'est dite très favorable à l'accession rapide de l'Algérie, reconnaissant des progrès substantiels dans son régime commercial, la question se pose de la pertinence de cette adhésion dans le contexte actuel. Nous nous proposons donc d'examiner les enjeux liés à l'adhésion de l'Algérie à l'OMC et d'apporter quelques éléments d'éclaircissement sur les avantages à en tirer et sur les défis à relever. Il ne suffit pas de lister d'une part les aspects positifs et d'autre part les aspects négatifs, il s'agit de les contextualiser et de dire si au final, l'adhésion de l'Algérie à l'OMC constituera un aiguillon pour accélérer les réformes ou une solution dangereuse et prématurée.

Suggested Citation

  • Myriam Donsimoni, 2015. "L’Algérie et l’OMC : je t’aime, moi non plus !," Post-Print hal-01348021, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01348021
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-01348021
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-01348021/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hiau LooiKee & Alessandro Nicita & Marcelo Olarreaga, 2009. "Estimating Trade Restrictiveness Indices," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 119(534), pages 172-199, January.
    2. Andrew B. Bernard & J. Bradford Jensen, 1999. "Exporting and Productivity," NBER Working Papers 7135, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    3. Ben Rejeb, Mouna, 2009. "Impact de l’ouverture sur la performance des entreprises : l’exemple tunisien," Economics Thesis from University Paris Dauphine, Paris Dauphine University, number 123456789/5563 edited by Guillochon, Bernard.
    4. repec:dau:papers:123456789/618 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Huy Quang Doan, 2019. "Trade, Institutional Quality and Income: Empirical Evidence for Sub-Saharan Africa," Economies, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-23, May.
    2. Salman Haider & Aadil Ahmad Ganaie & Bandi Kamaiah, 2019. "Total Factor Productivity and Openness in Indian Economy: 1970–2011," Foreign Trade Review, , vol. 54(1), pages 46-57, February.
    3. Andrew B. Bernard & Jonathan Eaton & J. Bradford Jensen & Samuel Kortum, 2003. "Plants and Productivity in International Trade," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 93(4), pages 1268-1290, September.
    4. Bouët, Antoine & Elbehri, Aziz & Nguyen, Duc Bao & Traoré, Fousseini, 2022. "Measuring Agricultural Trade Integration in Southeast Asia," Journal of Economic Integration, Center for Economic Integration, Sejong University, vol. 37(2), pages 235-266.
    5. Sébastien Jean, 2002. "International Trade and Firms' Heterogeneity under Monopolistic Competition," Open Economies Review, Springer, vol. 13(3), pages 291-311, July.
    6. Andersen, Torben M., 2005. "Product market integration, wage dispersion and unemployment," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 12(3), pages 379-406, June.
    7. Megha Mukim, 2011. "Trade integration, economic geography and productivity: The Indo-Sri Lanka FTA," ERSA conference papers ersa10p176, European Regional Science Association.
    8. Fontagné, Lionel & Orefice, Gianluca & Piermartini, Roberta & Rocha, Nadia, 2015. "Product standards and margins of trade: Firm-level evidence," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 97(1), pages 29-44.
    9. Naudé, Wim & Gries, Thomas & Bilkic, Natasa, 2015. "Playing the lottery or dressing up? A model of firm-level heterogeneity and the decision to export," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 1-17.
    10. Kym Anderson, 2006. "Reducing Distortions to Agricultural Incentives: Progress, Pitfalls, and Prospects," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 88(5), pages 1135-1146.
    11. de Melo, Jaime & Vijil, Mariana, 2014. "Barriers to Trade in Environmental Goods and Environmental Services: How Important Are They? How Much Progress at Reducing Them?," Climate Change and Sustainable Development 172425, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM).
    12. Beniamino Quintieri & Giovanni Stamato, 2023. "Are preferential agreements beneficial to EU trade? New evidence from the EU–South Korea treaty," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(12), pages 3511-3541, December.
    13. Anders Akerman & Rikard Forslid, 2009. "Firm Heterogeneity and Country Size Dependent Market Entry Costs," Global COE Hi-Stat Discussion Paper Series gd09-056, Institute of Economic Research, Hitotsubashi University.
    14. D. A. Izotov & K. I. Tochkov, 2020. "Interaction of the Russian Far East and Asia-Pacific Countries: Assessment of Institutional and Tariff Barriers to Trade," Regional Research of Russia, Springer, vol. 10(2), pages 182-193, April.
    15. repec:lic:licosd:15905 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Lloyd, Peter J. & Croser, Johanna L. & Anderson, Kym, 2009. "Global distortions to agricultural markets : new indicators of trade and welfare impacts, 1955 to 2007," Policy Research Working Paper Series 4865, The World Bank.
    17. Mahdi Ghodsi & Robert Stehrer, 2022. "Trade policy and global value chains: tariffs versus non-tariff measures," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 158(3), pages 887-916, August.
    18. Gay, Stephan Hubertus & Mellado, Aida Gonzalez & M'Barek, Robert, 2010. "Assessment of non-tariff measures for selected agri-food exports from Africa to the European Union," 2010 AAAE Third Conference/AEASA 48th Conference, September 19-23, 2010, Cape Town, South Africa 113785, African Association of Agricultural Economists (AAAE).
    19. Murat Seker, 2017. "Trade Policies, Investment Climate, and Export Performance," Bogazici Journal, Review of Social, Economic and Administrative Studies, Bogazici University, Department of Economics, vol. 31(2), pages 21-48.
    20. Badinger, Harald, 2008. "Trade policy and productivity," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 52(5), pages 867-891, July.
    21. Götz, Christian & Heckelei, Thomas & Rudloff, Bettina, 2010. "What makes countries initiate WTO disputes on food-related issues?," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 154-162, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01348021. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.