IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-01230027.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

L'outil-frise : une expérimentation interdisciplinaire

Author

Listed:
  • Agnès Bergeret

    (Labex ITEM - Laboratoire d'excellence Innovation et Territoires de Montagne - UPMF - Université Pierre Mendès France - Grenoble 2 - UJF - Université Joseph Fourier - Grenoble 1 - IRSTEA - Institut national de recherche en sciences et technologies pour l'environnement et l'agriculture - USMB [Université de Savoie] [Université de Chambéry] - Université Savoie Mont Blanc)

  • Emmanuelle George-Marcelpoil

    (UR DTGR - Développement des territoires montagnards - IRSTEA - Institut national de recherche en sciences et technologies pour l'environnement et l'agriculture)

  • Jean-Jacques Delannoy

    (EDYTEM - Environnements, Dynamiques et Territoires de Montagne - USMB [Université de Savoie] [Université de Chambéry] - Université Savoie Mont Blanc - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - Fédération OSUG - Observatoire des Sciences de l'Univers de Grenoble)

  • Delphine Piazza-Morel

    (Labex ITEM - Laboratoire d'excellence Innovation et Territoires de Montagne - UPMF - Université Pierre Mendès France - Grenoble 2 - UJF - Université Joseph Fourier - Grenoble 1 - IRSTEA - Institut national de recherche en sciences et technologies pour l'environnement et l'agriculture - USMB [Université de Savoie] [Université de Chambéry] - Université Savoie Mont Blanc)

Abstract

Le LabEx Innovation et Territoires de Montagne a pour ambition de construire une communauté de recherche en sciences humaines et sociales travaillant sur la montagne. Dans cette dynamique, un collectif de chercheurs issus de différents champs disciplinaires et de parcours variés s'est proposé de développer une démarche de recherche qui dépasse les clivages disciplinaires par la formalisation d'un outil de dialogue sur le changement territorial. Ce carnet expose la construction, les enjeux et les résultats d'une telle démarche. Celle-ci a conduit à la mise en place d'un dispositif comprenant l'élaboration de documents-ressources, l'expérimentation collective d'une méthode sur différents systèmes territoriaux de montagne, l'échange en séminaires, ainsi que les retours critiques individuels et collectifs sur les apports d'une telle expérimentation. Au cœur de ce dispositif, « l'outil-frise », un outil de représentation synthétique et globale des changements territoriaux, qui permet de visualiser les co-évolutions et les interactions des composantes d'un processus complexe. Il implique une mise en perspective processuelle de l'objet d'étude, à savoir l'identification de la nature des mouvements et des moteurs facteurs de changements. Les enjeux épistémologiques et méthodologiques des différentes approches disciplinaires du changement ont ainsi pu être abordés, et notamment les concepts de rupture, de bifurcation, d'adaptation ou de transition territoriales.

Suggested Citation

  • Agnès Bergeret & Emmanuelle George-Marcelpoil & Jean-Jacques Delannoy & Delphine Piazza-Morel, 2015. "L'outil-frise : une expérimentation interdisciplinaire," Post-Print hal-01230027, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01230027
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-01230027v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-01230027v1/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bernard Pecqueur, 2005. "Les territoires créateurs de nouvelles ressources productives : le cas de l'agglomération grenobloise," Géographie, économie, société, Lavoisier, vol. 7(3), pages 255-268.
    2. Bernard Pecqueur & Véronique Peyrache-Gadeau, 2010. "Fondements interdisciplinaires et systémiques de l'approche territoriale Introduction," Revue d'économie régionale et urbaine, Armand Colin, vol. 0(4), pages 613-623.
    3. Paul R. Carlile, 2004. "Transferring, Translating, and Transforming: An Integrative Framework for Managing Knowledge Across Boundaries," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 15(5), pages 555-568, October.
    4. Olivier Crevoisier & Hugues Jeannerat, 2009. "Les dynamiques territoriales de connaissance : relations multilocales et ancrage regional," Revue d'économie industrielle, De Boeck Université, vol. 0(4), pages 77-99.
    5. Hervé Gumuchian & Bernard Pecqueur, 2007. "La ressource territoriale," Post-Print halshs-00265070, HAL.
    6. Geels, Frank W. & Schot, Johan, 2007. "Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 399-417, April.
    7. Paul R. Carlile, 2002. "A Pragmatic View of Knowledge and Boundaries: Boundary Objects in New Product Development," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 13(4), pages 442-455, August.
    8. Olivier Crevoisier & Bernard Pecqueur & Véronique Peyrache-Gadeau & Bénédicte Serrate, 2008. "Conclusion : Dynamiques territoriales : quels chantiers de recherche ?," Revue d'économie régionale et urbaine, Armand Colin, vol. 0(2), pages 265-268.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Daniele T. P. Souza & Eugenia A. Kuhn & Arjen E. J. Wals & Pedro R. Jacobi, 2020. "Learning in, with, and through the Territory: Territory-Based Learning as a Catalyst for Urban Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-19, April.
    2. Marco Tortoriello & Ray Reagans & Bill McEvily, 2012. "Bridging the Knowledge Gap: The Influence of Strong Ties, Network Cohesion, and Network Range on the Transfer of Knowledge Between Organizational Units," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 23(4), pages 1024-1039, August.
    3. Maggie Chuoyan Dong & Yulin Fang & Detmar W. Straub, 2017. "The Impact of Institutional Distance on the Joint Performance of Collaborating Firms: The Role of Adaptive Interorganizational Systems," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 28(2), pages 309-331, June.
    4. Hilda Bø Lyng & Eric Christian Brun, 2018. "Knowledge Transition: A Conceptual Model of Knowledge Transfer for Cross-Industry Innovation," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 15(05), pages 1-23, October.
    5. Eden, Colin & Ackermann, Fran, 2018. "Theory into practice, practice to theory: Action research in method development," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 271(3), pages 1145-1155.
    6. Michael J.D. Roberts & Paul W. Beamish, 2017. "The Scaffolding Activities of International Returnee Executives: A Learning Based Perspective of Global Boundary Spanning," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(4), pages 511-539, June.
    7. Paula Jarzabkowski & Sarah Kaplan, 2015. "Strategy tools-in-use: A framework for understanding “technologies of rationality” in practice," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(4), pages 537-558, April.
    8. Johann Piet Hausberg & Peter S. H. Leeflang, 2019. "Absorbing Integration: Empirical Evidence On The Mediating Role Of Absorptive Capacity Between Functional-/Cross-Functional Integration And Innovation Performance," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 23(06), pages 1-37, August.
    9. Thierry Gateau & Laurent Simon, 2016. "Clown Scouting And Casting At The Cirque Du Soleil: Designing Boundary Practices For Talent Development And Knowledge Creation," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 20(04), pages 1-31, May.
    10. Shaker A. Zahra & Satish Nambisan, 2011. "Entrepreneurship in global innovation ecosystems," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 1(1), pages 4-17, March.
    11. Caroline A. Bartel & Raghu Garud, 2009. "The Role of Narratives in Sustaining Organizational Innovation," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 20(1), pages 107-117, February.
    12. Kimble, Chris & Grenier, Corinne & Goglio-Primard, Karine, 2010. "Innovation and knowledge sharing across professional boundaries: Political interplay between boundary objects and brokers," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 30(5), pages 437-444.
    13. Corinne Bendersky & Kathleen L. McGinn, 2010. "Perspective---Open to Negotiation: Phenomenological Assumptions and Knowledge Dissemination," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 21(3), pages 781-797, June.
    14. Paul M. Leonardi, 2011. "Innovation Blindness: Culture, Frames, and Cross-Boundary Problem Construction in the Development of New Technology Concepts," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(2), pages 347-369, April.
    15. Johan M. Berlin & Eric D. Carlström, 2015. "Cultural camouflage—a critical study of how artefacts are camouflaged and mental health policy subverted," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(2), pages 111-126, April.
    16. Champenois, Claire & Etzkowitz, Henry, 2018. "From boundary line to boundary space: The creation of hybrid organizations as a Triple Helix micro-foundation," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 76, pages 28-39.
    17. Aimée A. Kane & Natalia Levina, 2017. "‘Am I Still One of Them?’: Bicultural Immigrant Managers Navigating Social Identity Threats When Spanning Global Boundaries," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(4), pages 540-577, June.
    18. Cacciatori, Eugenia, 2008. "Memory objects in project environments: Storing, retrieving and adapting learning in project-based firms," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(9), pages 1591-1601, October.
    19. Hall, Matthew & Mikes, Anette & Millo, Yuval, 2015. "How do risk managers become influential?: a field study of toolmaking in two financial institutions," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 60485, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    20. Siebelink, Remco & Hofman, Erwin & Halman, Johannes I.M. & Nee, Ingo, 2021. "Roadmapping: (Missed) opportunities to overcome strategic challenges," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 64(4), pages 501-512.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01230027. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.