IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-01202541.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Dynamics of internal R&D stakeholders in the Fuzzy Front-End of breakthrough engineering projects

Author

Listed:
  • Sophie Hooge

    (CGS i3 - Centre de Gestion Scientifique i3 - Mines Paris - PSL (École nationale supérieure des mines de Paris) - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - I3 - Institut interdisciplinaire de l’innovation - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Cédric Dalmasso

    (CGS i3 - Centre de Gestion Scientifique i3 - Mines Paris - PSL (École nationale supérieure des mines de Paris) - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - I3 - Institut interdisciplinaire de l’innovation - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

Abstract

In competitive industries, intensive innovation is a recognized necessity (Wheelwright and Clark, 1992; Le Masson et al., 2010). One success factor of breakthrough R&D projects lies in the knowledge articulation between innovation definition phases, composed of fuzzy front-end (FFE) and innovative new product development (NPD) stages (Koen et al, 2002; Cooper et al, 2001), and industrial development processes. Then, central issue for innovation projects managers becomes internal R&D stakeholders' management (Elias et al., 2002) and sustainable learning dynamics across the two parts of the organization (O'Connor, 2008). Our paper fits into this research gap for local breakthrough R&D in the dominant design. We discuss the role of technical expertise level of NDP stakeholders involved in early stages of innovative projects. The research mobilized two longitudinal studies (Yin, 1989) carried out with a global car manufacturer through collaborative management research (Radaelli et al., 2012) since 2005, one focusing on the FFE management, while the other was devoted to learning dynamics of engineering development departments. A cartography of the internal network of breakthrough R&D (Mitchell et al, 1997) underlined a stable organizational network across projects. Nevertheless, a quantitative analysis of accounting data on 8 projects highlights important dynamics of involvement or dis-engagement within the network. The analysis showed that the accounting reporting at the portfolio level used to hide to top-managers the heterogeneity and depth of resources dynamics at the project level. The impacts of local breakthrough R&D on the engineering development organization was similar to waves: some stakeholders, who played roles of experts, spokespersons or innovation design strategists, were able to involve quickly the individuals to maintain the project progress, sometime generating an over-commitment on innovation projects. At the opposite, a lack of trust of the design partners generated withdrawal of resources that needed a strong stakeholder management to be prevented.

Suggested Citation

  • Sophie Hooge & Cédric Dalmasso, 2015. "Dynamics of internal R&D stakeholders in the Fuzzy Front-End of breakthrough engineering projects," Post-Print hal-01202541, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01202541
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://minesparis-psl.hal.science/hal-01202541v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://minesparis-psl.hal.science/hal-01202541v1/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. R. Edward Freeman & Gianfranco Rusconi & Silvana Signori & Alan Strudler, 2012. "Stakeholder Theory(ies): Ethical Ideas and Managerial Action," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 109(1), pages 1-2, August.
    2. Carliss Y. Baldwin & Kim B. Clark, 2000. "Design Rules, Volume 1: The Power of Modularity," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262024667, April.
    3. Sylvain Lenfle, 2008. "Exploration and Project Management," Post-Print hal-00404168, HAL.
    4. Pascal Le Masson & Benoit Weil & Armand Hatchuel, 2010. "Strategic Management of Design and Innovation," Post-Print hal-00696953, HAL.
    5. Thomas Gillier & Sophie Hooge & Gérald Piat, 2015. "Framing value management for creative projects: An expansive perspective," Grenoble Ecole de Management (Post-Print) hal-01134251, HAL.
    6. Michael T. Pich & Christoph H. Loch & Arnoud De Meyer, 2002. "On Uncertainty, Ambiguity, and Complexity in Project Management," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 48(8), pages 1008-1023, August.
    7. Grant Savage & Michele Bunn & Barbara Gray & Qian Xiao & Sijun Wang & Elizabeth Wilson & Eric Williams, 2010. "Stakeholder Collaboration: Implications for Stakeholder Theory and Practice," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 96(1), pages 21-26, August.
    8. Sofia Borjesson & Maria Elmquist & Sophie Hooge, 2014. "The challenges of innovation capability building: Learning from longitudinal studies of innovation efforts at Renault and Volvo Cars," Post-Print halshs-00952595, HAL.
    9. Giovanni Dosi & Christopher Freeman & Richard Nelson & Gerarld Silverberg & Luc Soete (ed.), 1988. "Technical Change and Economic Theory," LEM Book Series, Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM), Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy, number dosietal-1988, November.
    10. Thomas Gillier & Sophie Hooge & Gérald Piat, 2015. "Framing value management for creative projects: An expansive perspective," Post-Print hal-01134251, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sylvain Lenfle, 2011. "The strategy of parallel approaches in projects with unforeseeable uncertainty: the Manhattan case in retrospect," Post-Print hal-00658346, HAL.
    2. Sophie Hooge & Mathias Béjean & Frédéric Arnoux, 2016. "Organising For Radical Innovation: The Benefits Of The Interplay Between Cognitive And Organisational Processes In Kcp Workshops," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 20(04), pages 1-33, May.
    3. Sophie Hooge & Milena Klasing Chen & Dominique Laousse, 2019. "Managing the emergence of concepts in fuzzy front end: a framework of strategic performance and emerging process of innovation briefs," Post-Print hal-02167857, HAL.
    4. repec:hal:gemwpa:hal-00824354 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Sophie Hooge & Cédric Dalmasso, 2011. "Learning from innovation echoes in mature organizations - The case of the automotive industry," Post-Print hal-00696968, HAL.
    6. Marie-Alix Deval & Sophie Hooge & Benoit Weil, 2021. "The emergence of “experts of the unknown” – Learnings from Renault and SNCF," Post-Print hal-03264373, HAL.
    7. Pascal Le Masson & Armand Hatchuel & Olga Kokshagina & Benoit Weil, 2016. "Designing techniques for systemic impact: lessons from C-K theory and matroid structures," Post-Print hal-01389630, HAL.
    8. Pascal Le Masson & Armand Hatchuel & Benoit Weil, 2016. "Innovation theory and the logic of generativity: from optimization to design, a new post-decisional paradigm in management science," Post-Print hal-01481881, HAL.
    9. Matthew R. Silver & Olivier L. de Weck, 2007. "Time‐expanded decision networks: A framework for designing evolvable complex systems," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 10(2), pages 167-188, June.
    10. Dosi, Giovanni & Nelson, Richard R., 2010. "Technical Change and Industrial Dynamics as Evolutionary Processes," Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, in: Bronwyn H. Hall & Nathan Rosenberg (ed.), Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 0, pages 51-127, Elsevier.
    11. Pascal Le Masson & Armand Hatchuel & Olga Kokshagina & Benoit Weil, 2015. "Generic technique and the dynamics of technologies: using matroid and design theory to design techniques with systemic impact," Post-Print hal-01154149, HAL.
    12. Thomas Gillier & Sophie Hooge & Gérald Piat, 2013. "Framing the scope of value in exploratory projects: An expansive value management model," Grenoble Ecole de Management (Post-Print) hal-00824354, HAL.
    13. Frédéric MAZAUD (LEREPS-GRES) & Marie LAGASSE (AIRBUS-FRANCE), 2007. "Vertical sub-contracting relationships strategy, the Airbus First-tier suppliers\' coordination," Cahiers du GRES (2002-2009) 2007-02, Groupement de Recherches Economiques et Sociales.
    14. Thomas Gillier & Sophie Hooge & Gérald Piat, 2013. "Framing the scope of value in exploratory projects: An expansive value management model," Post-Print hal-00824354, HAL.
    15. Sophie Hooge & Milena Klasing Chen & Dominique Laousse, 2018. "Dynamics of innovative concepts in exploratory projects: managing consistency between originality, collaboration and strategy," Post-Print hal-01900545, HAL.
    16. Marc Barbier & Pauline Caron & Pascal Le Masson & Franck Aggeri, 2012. "The sustainable fibres of generative expectation management: The “building with hemp” case study," Post-Print hal-01117313, HAL.
    17. Manuel E. Sosa & Jürgen Mihm & Tyson R. Browning, 2013. "Linking Cyclicality and Product Quality," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 15(3), pages 473-491, July.
    18. Deichmann, Dirk & Gillier, Thomas & Tonellato, Marco, 2021. "Getting on board with new ideas: An analysis of idea commitments on a crowdsourcing platform," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(9).
    19. Sophie Hooge & Laura Le Du, 2014. "Stimulating industrial ecosystems with sociotechnical imaginaries: The case of Renault Innovation Community," Post-Print hal-00975558, HAL.
    20. Eric von Hippel & Georg von Krogh, 2016. "CROSSROADS—Identifying Viable “Need–Solution Pairs”: Problem Solving Without Problem Formulation," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(1), pages 207-221, February.
    21. Uwe Cantner & Martin Kalthaus & Matthias Menter & Pierre Mohnen, 2023. "Global knowledge flows: characteristics, determinants, and impacts," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 32(5), pages 1063-1076.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Breakthrough R&D; Stakeholders management; Commitment;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01202541. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.