IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/gemptp/hal-04577063.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Ecosystem creation under high uncertainty – a longitudinal analysis of the alignment process

Author

Listed:
  • Nuria Moratal

    (Nantes Univ - Nantes Université, LEMNA - Laboratoire d'économie et de management de Nantes Atlantique - Nantes Univ - IAE Nantes - Nantes Université - Institut d'Administration des Entreprises - Nantes - Nantes Université - pôle Sociétés - Nantes Univ - Nantes Université)

  • Anne-Lorpene Vernay

    (GEM Recherche - EESC-GEM Grenoble Ecole de Management)

  • Carine Sebi

    (GEM Recherche - EESC-GEM Grenoble Ecole de Management)

Abstract

Sustainability-oriented innovation increasingly materializes through business ecosystem. To create value, business ecosystems rely on complementary inputs made by interconnected, yet independent actors. Ecosystem research has highlighted the role of the central actor (aka keystone) to coordinate the different interdependent actors. It also discusses tensions that the keystone has to deal with in order to reach alignment. Research often focuses on business ecosystems that are based on digital platforms. These ecosystems are characterised by a high flexibility and adaptive capacity. Little research looked at business ecosystems that are based on technological infrastructure that are asset-heavy and prone to technological lock-in. This article proposes to analyse how alignment is reached and maintained in ecosystems that require the development of an asset-heavy technological infrastructure. We inquiry into which are the tensions inherent to asset-heavy ecosystems and how these tensions are tackled. We do that by conducting a longitudinal analysis of a business ecosystem aiming to deploy an infrastructure of green hydrogen refuelling stations in the Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes region, France. Analysis is based on 34 interviews conducted over an 18 month period. The paper contributes to the growing literature on business ecosystems. Results show that reaching and maintaining alignment requires being able to cope with three tensions and discuss eight strategies that the keystone mobilised to do so. We associate each of these tensions to different key moments of ecosystem formation.

Suggested Citation

  • Nuria Moratal & Anne-Lorpene Vernay & Carine Sebi, 2021. "Ecosystem creation under high uncertainty – a longitudinal analysis of the alignment process," Grenoble Ecole de Management (Post-Print) hal-04577063, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:gemptp:hal-04577063
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-04577063v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-04577063v1/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Filipe Santos, 2012. "A Positive Theory of Social Entrepreneurship," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 111(3), pages 335-351, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Manhart, Niklas, 2022. "The Mission Comes First: Exploring the Mechanisms of Organizational Sponsorship for the Acceleration of Social Start-Ups," Junior Management Science (JUMS), Junior Management Science e. V., vol. 7(2), pages 289-337.
    2. Murphy Patrick J. & Pollack Jeff & Nagy Brian & Rutherford Matthew & Coombes Susan, 2019. "Risk Tolerance, Legitimacy, and Perspective: Navigating Biases in Social Enterprise Evaluations," Entrepreneurship Research Journal, De Gruyter, vol. 9(4), pages 1-19, October.
    3. Nosheena Yasir & Nasir Mahmood & Hafiz Shakir Mehmood & Osama Rashid & An Liren, 2021. "The Integrated Role of Personal Values and Theory of Planned Behavior to Form a Sustainable Entrepreneurial Intention," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-21, August.
    4. Reeti Kulshrestha & Arunaditya Sahay & Subhanjan Sengupta, 2022. "Constituents and Drivers of Mission Engagement for Social Enterprise Sustainability: A Systematic Review," Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Emerging Economies, Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India, vol. 31(1), pages 90-120, March.
    5. Barbara Bradač Hojnik & Katja Crnogaj, 2020. "Social Impact, Innovations, and Market Activity of Social Enterprises: Comparison of European Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-15, March.
    6. Robin Stevens & Nathalie Moray & Johan Bruneel, 2015. "The Social and Economic Mission of Social Enterprises: Dimensions, Measurement, Validation, and Relation," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 39(5), pages 1051-1082, September.
    7. Tongyu Meng & Jamie Newth & Christine Woods, 2022. "Ethical Sensemaking in Impact Investing: Reasons and Motives in the Chinese Renewable Energy Sector," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 179(4), pages 1091-1117, September.
    8. David Bruce Audretsch & Maksim Belitski & Georg Maximilian Eichler & Erich Schwarz, 2024. "Entrepreneurial ecosystems, institutional quality, and the unexpected role of the sustainability orientation of entrepreneurs," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 62(2), pages 503-522, February.
    9. Iuliu Marin IVANESCU & Camelia M. GHEORGHE & Gina Gilet SZTRUTEN, 2013. "Social Entrepreneurship In Eu Region," Romanian Economic Business Review, Romanian-American University, vol. 8(4.1), pages 416-426, december.
    10. repec:tiu:tiutis:59edbbb2-7e12-4c54-a431-d37c6df29694 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Arzi Adbi, 2023. "Financial Sustainability of For-Profit Versus Non-Profit Microfinance Organizations Following a Scandal," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 188(1), pages 57-74, November.
    12. Richter, Ralph, 2020. "Innovations at the edge: how local innovations are established in less favourable environments," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, issue Latest Ar, pages 1-21.
    13. Aikaterini Argyrou & Nicolas Chevrollier & Andre Nijhof, 2023. "The versatile role of sustainable market entrepreneurs in market transformation: An intervention framework for institutional change," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(1), pages 259-273, January.
    14. Chandra, Yanto & Tjiptono, Fandy & Setyawan, Andhy, 2021. "The promise of entrepreneurial passion to advance social entrepreneurship research," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 16(C).
    15. Cieslik, Katarzyna, 2016. "Moral Economy Meets Social Enterprise Community-Based Green Energy Project in Rural Burundi," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 12-26.
    16. Bhattarai, Charan Raj & Kwong, Caleb C.Y. & Tasavori, Misagh, 2019. "Market orientation, market disruptiveness capability and social enterprise performance: An empirical study from the United Kingdom," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 47-60.
    17. Saskia Crucke & Adelien Decramer, 2016. "The Development of a Measurement Instrument for the Organizational Performance of Social Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-30, February.
    18. Dumitru, Stratan, 2017. "Perspectives For Development Social Entrepreneurship In Republic Of Moldova," APSTRACT: Applied Studies in Agribusiness and Commerce, AGRIMBA, vol. 10(4-5), April.
    19. Sophie Bacq & Kimberly A. Eddleston, 2018. "A Resource-Based View of Social Entrepreneurship: How Stewardship Culture Benefits Scale of Social Impact," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 152(3), pages 589-611, October.
    20. Jin Byungchae, 2020. "The Practical Intelligence of Social Entrepreneurs: Managing the Hybridity of Social Enterprises," Entrepreneurship Research Journal, De Gruyter, vol. 10(1), pages 1-19, January.
    21. Andrea Salustri & Andrea Appolloni & Maria Alessandra Antonelli, 2025. "Social and solidarity economy: a conceptual framework for social impact measurement and evaluation," Public Finance Research Papers 67, Istituto di Economia e Finanza, DSGE, Sapienza University of Rome.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Ecosystem; Uncertainty;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:gemptp:hal-04577063. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.