IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/gtr/gatrjs/gjbssr569.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Research Synthesis on Educational Models

Author

Listed:
  • Chaiwichit Chianchana

    (Faculty of Technical Education, King Mongkut's University of Technology North Bangkok, Thailand. Author-2-Name: Author-2-Workplace-Name: Author-3-Name: Author-3-Workplace-Name: Author-4-Name: Author-4-Workplace-Name: Author-5-Name: Author-5-Workplace-Name: Author-6-Name: Author-6-Workplace-Name: Author-7-Name: Author-7-Workplace-Name: Author-8-Name: Author-8-Workplace-Name:)

Abstract

Objective - The purpose of this research is to evaluate research on educational models, to study the effect of the research characteristics on educational models, and to synthesize the research methods and presentations about educational models through qualitative synthesis by content analysis. Methodology/Technique - The sample was research on educational models on the type of thesis at the graduate level from 2013 to present. The research instruments took three forms. The data analysis method used was the ATLAS.ti program using content analysis, frequency, and percentage. Finding - The results show that: 1) The research evaluation on educational models the most of the research used to synthesize research at a very good level, 2) The most research characteristics: research issue was personality traits, research problem presentation was the characteristic of the research problem presentation reflecting the importance of the study, setting research objectives was the study the composition/indicators, develop the model and study the use of the model, and research conceptual framework was the bringing each concept/component together, 3) The most common research methodology applied in the research was research and development (method), focus group discussion (technique), an expert (sample), purposive sampling (sampling), interviews (tool), mean and standard deviation (data analysis), one-group pre-test/post-test design (research design), and 4) there were 8 types of research result presentations on educational models which were descriptive characteristics, causal relationship, the proposed process steps as objective, design characteristics on standard/indicators/factors of model. Novelty - The qualitative characteristics, system approach characteristics, experimental characteristics, and mixed-method between quantitative and qualitative methods. Type of Paper - Empirical

Suggested Citation

  • Chaiwichit Chianchana, 2020. "Research Synthesis on Educational Models," GATR Journals gjbssr569, Global Academy of Training and Research (GATR) Enterprise.
    • Handle: RePEc:gtr:gatrjs:gjbssr569
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://gatrenterprise.com/GATRJournals/GJBSSR/pdf_files/GJBSSRVol8(3)2020/5.Chaiwichit%20Chianchana-Edited.pdf
    Download Restriction: http://gatrenterprise.com/GATRJournals/online_submission.html
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Greenhalgh, Trisha & Robert, Glenn & Macfarlane, Fraser & Bate, Paul & Kyriakidou, Olympia & Peacock, Richard, 2005. "Storylines of research in diffusion of innovation: a meta-narrative approach to systematic review," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 61(2), pages 417-430, July.
    2. Massey, Oliver T., 2011. "A proposed model for the analysis and interpretation of focus groups in evaluation research," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 21-28, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jesus Gonzalez-Feliu, 2013. "Vehicle Routing in Multi-Echelon Distribution Systems with Cross-Docking: A Systematic Lexical-Metanarrative Analysis," Post-Print halshs-00834573, HAL.
    2. Gagliardi, Dimitri & Ramlogan, Ronnie & Navarra, Pierluigi & Dello Russo, Cinzia, 2018. "Diffusion of complementary evolving pharmaceutical innovations: The case of Abacavir and its pharmacogenetic companion diagnostic in Italy," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 223-233.
    3. Isabella Bonacci & Andrea Mazzitelli & Donato Morea, 2020. "Evaluating Climate between Working Excellence and Organizational Innovation: What Comes First?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-29, April.
    4. Hansen, Henrik & Trifkovic, Neda, 2013. "Systematic Reviews: Questions, Methods and Usage," MPRA Paper 47993, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Eeva-Sofia Säynäjoki & Jukka Heinonen & Seppo Junnila, 2014. "The Power of Urban Planning on Environmental Sustainability: A Focus Group Study in Finland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(10), pages 1-22, September.
    6. Robert Kaba Alhassan & Edward Nketiah-Amponsah & Daniel Kojo Arhinful, 2016. "A Review of the National Health Insurance Scheme in Ghana: What Are the Sustainability Threats and Prospects?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(11), pages 1-16, November.
    7. Kahiya, Eldrede T., 2018. "Five decades of research on export barriers: Review and future directions," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 27(6), pages 1172-1188.
    8. Mike Burbridge & Gregory M. Morrison, 2021. "A Systematic Literature Review of Partnership Development at the University–Industry–Government Nexus," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-24, December.
    9. Mathew Azarian & Hao Yu & Asmamaw Tadege Shiferaw & Tor Kristian Stevik, 2023. "Do We Perform Systematic Literature Review Right? A Scientific Mapping and Methodological Assessment," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-32, November.
    10. Aslam, Usman & Davis, Leon, 2024. "Analyzing consumer expectations and experiences of Augmented Reality (AR) apps in the fashion retail sector," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    11. Prattana Punnakitikashem & Philip Hallinger, 2019. "Bibliometric Review of the Knowledge Base on Healthcare Management for Sustainability, 1994–2018," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-17, December.
    12. Deprez, Jana & Leroy, Hannes & Euwema, Martin, 2018. "Three chronological steps toward encouraging intrapreneurship: Lessons from the Wehkamp case," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 61(1), pages 135-145.
    13. Gupta, Samir & Maltz, Elliot, 2015. "Interdependency, dynamism, and variety (IDV) network modeling to explain knowledge diffusion at the fuzzy front-end of innovation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(11), pages 2434-2442.
    14. Liberati, Elisa Giulia & Gorli, Mara & Moja, Lorenzo & Galuppo, Laura & Ripamonti, Silvio & Scaratti, Giuseppe, 2015. "Exploring the practice of patient centered care: The role of ethnography and reflexivity," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 45-52.
    15. Kim, Jinhee & de Leeuw, Evelyne & Harris-Roxas, Ben & Sainsbury, Peter, 2023. "Five urban health research traditions: A meta-narrative review," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 336(C).
    16. Maria Chiara Demartini & Valentina Beretta, 2020. "La gestione della cronicit? nelle aziende sanitarie: una rassegna della letteratura," MECOSAN, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 0(116), pages 7-30.
    17. Burke, John & Fitzhenry, Mark & Houghton, Sharon & Fortune, Donal G., 2021. "Breaking the cycle of intergenerational trauma: Evaluating the impact of parental adverse childhood experiences on parenting group outcomes using a mixed-methods approach," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    18. Gonot-Schoupinsky, Freda N. & Garip, Gulcan & Sheffield, David, 2022. "Facilitating the planning and evaluation of narrative intervention reviews: Systematic Transparency Assessment in Intervention Reviews (STAIR)," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    19. Calderón-Larrañaga, Sara & Greenhalgh, Trish & Finer, Sarah & Clinch, Megan, 2024. "What does social prescribing look like in practice? A qualitative case study informed by practice theory," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 343(C).
    20. Ford, Rebecca & Maidment, Chris & Vigurs, Carol & Fell, Michael J. & Morris, Madeleine, 2021. "Smart local energy systems (SLES): A framework for exploring transition, context, and impacts," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Research Synthesis; Educational Model; Evaluative Research; Research Characteristics; Research Methodology; Research Result Presentation.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • A20 - General Economics and Teaching - - Economic Education and Teaching of Economics - - - General
    • A39 - General Economics and Teaching - - Multisubject Collective Works - - - Other

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gtr:gatrjs:gjbssr569. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Prof. Dr. Abd Rahim Mohamad (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://gatrenterprise.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.