IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/binfse/v1y2009i3p245-253.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Enterprise Identity Management – Towards a Decision Support Framework Based on the Balanced Scorecard Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Denis Royer
  • Martin Meints

Abstract

Enterprise Identity Management Systems (EIdMS) are an IT-based infrastructure that needs to be integrated into various business processes and related infrastructures. Assessment and preparation of decisions for the introduction need to take the costs, benefits, and the organizational settings into consideration. A variety of methods for the evaluation and decision support of new IT (e. g. EIdMS) are discussed in the literature – however, these are typically based on single dimensions (e. g. financial or technology aspects). This paper proposes a multidimensional decision support framework, based on the Balanced Scorecard concept. The presented approach introduces four perspectives and a related set of initial decision parameters to support decision making. The perspectives are (a) financial/monetary, (b) business processes, (c) supporting processes and (ICT) infrastructure and (d) information security, risks and compliance. Perspectives and adaptable sets of decision parameters also may serve as foundation for software-based decision support instruments. Copyright Gabler Verlag 2009

Suggested Citation

  • Denis Royer & Martin Meints, 2009. "Enterprise Identity Management – Towards a Decision Support Framework Based on the Balanced Scorecard Approach," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 1(3), pages 245-253, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:binfse:v:1:y:2009:i:3:p:245-253
    DOI: 10.1007/s12599-009-0052-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s12599-009-0052-5
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12599-009-0052-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mooraj, Stella & Oyon, Daniel & Hostettler, Didier, 1999. "The balanced scorecard: a necessary good or an unnecessary evil?," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 17(5), pages 481-491, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Peter Rohner, 2013. "Identity Management for Health Professionals," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 5(1), pages 17-33, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. H A Akkermans & K E van Oorschot, 2005. "Relevance assumed: a case study of balanced scorecard development using system dynamics," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 56(8), pages 931-941, August.
    2. Rui Silva & Cidália Oliveira, 2020. "The Influence of Innovation in Tangible and Intangible Resource Allocation: A Qualitative Multi Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-22, June.
    3. Selena Aureli & Andrea Cardoni & Mara Del Baldo & Rosa Lombardi, 2018. "The Balanced Scorecard Logic in The Management Control and Reporting of Small Business Company Networks: A Case Study," Journal of Accounting and Management Information Systems, Faculty of Accounting and Management Information Systems, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, vol. 17(2), pages 191-215, June.
    4. Lucia Clara Banchieri & Fernando Campa Planas & Maria Victoria Sanchez Rebull, 2011. "What has been said, and what remains to be said, about the balanced scorecard?," Zbornik radova Ekonomskog fakulteta u Rijeci/Proceedings of Rijeka Faculty of Economics, University of Rijeka, Faculty of Economics and Business, vol. 29(1), pages 155-192.
    5. Kourtit, K. & Waal, A. de & Nijkamp, P., 2009. "Strategic Performance Management and Creative Industry," Serie Research Memoranda 0020, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
    6. Chenhall, Robert H., 2005. "Integrative strategic performance measurement systems, strategic alignment of manufacturing, learning and strategic outcomes: an exploratory study," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 30(5), pages 395-422, July.
    7. Denis Choffel & François Meyssonnier, 2005. "Dix Ans De Debats Autour Du Balanced Scorecard," Post-Print halshs-00581157, HAL.
    8. Vladimir MYAKSHIN & Vladimir PETROV, 2020. "Balanced Scorecard As A Tool For Evaluating The Investment Attractiveness Of Regions Comprising The Arctic Zone Of The Russian Federation," Regional Science Inquiry, Hellenic Association of Regional Scientists, vol. 0(2), pages 69-80, June.
    9. Vinh Sum Chau & Barry J. Witcher, 2005. "Implications of Regulation Policy Incentives for Strategic Control: An Integrative Model," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 76(1), pages 85-119, March.
    10. LIN, Zhijun & YU, Zengbiao & ZHANG, Liqun, 2014. "Performance outcomes of balanced scorecard application in hospital administration in China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 1-15.
    11. César Álvarez & Vicente Rodríguez & Francisco Ortega & Joaquín Villanueva, 2015. "A Scorecard Framework Proposal for Improving Software Factories’ Sustainability: A Case Study of a Spanish Firm in the Financial Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(12), pages 1-23, December.
    12. Paul Andon & Jane Baxter & Habib Mahama, 2005. "The Balanced Scorecard: Slogans, Seduction, and State of Play," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 15(35), pages 29-38, March.
    13. Gérald Naro & Denis Travaillé, 2010. "Le Balanced Scorecard Revisite A Travers Le Modele Des Leviers De Controle : Les Enseignements De Deux Etudes De Cas," Post-Print hal-00479526, HAL.
    14. Alpha Nur Setyawan Pudjono, 2024. "Examining the Causal Relationships of Balanced Scorecard Perspectives on Organizational Performance Improvement: A Case Study from the Indonesian Public Sector," GATR Journals afr232, Global Academy of Training and Research (GATR) Enterprise.
    15. Ilona Berková & Markéta Adamová & Kristýna Nývltová, 2017. "Realtionships between Fiancial and Learning and Growth Perspectives in BSC," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 65(6), pages 1841-1850.
    16. Mai, Nhat Chi, 2021. "Determinants of successful adoption of the Balanced Scorecard in Vietnamese small and medium-sized enterprises," OSF Preprints 5hx2r, Center for Open Science.
    17. Yael Perlman, 2013. "Causal Relationships in the Balanced Scorecard: A Path Analysis Approach," Journal of Management and Strategy, Journal of Management and Strategy, Sciedu Press, vol. 4(1), pages 70-79, February.
    18. Enrico Bracci & Laura Maran, 2011. "Performance measurement in the public sector: some theoretical and practical reflections," Working Papers 201121, University of Ferrara, Department of Economics.
    19. Graham Hubbard, 2009. "Measuring organizational performance: beyond the triple bottom line," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(3), pages 177-191, March.
    20. Cidália Oliveira & Margarida Rodrigues & Rui Silva & Galvão Meirinhos & Mário Franco, 2022. "BSC’s Perspectives Ranking towards Organizational Performance: An Empirical Study Performed with Portuguese Exporters," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-22, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:binfse:v:1:y:2009:i:3:p:245-253. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.