IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/gtr/gatrjs/afr140.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Value Relevance of Firms� Reportable Segment Profit or Loss Reconciliation

Author

Listed:
  • Nunung Nuryani

    (Master of Accounting Program, Institut Bisnis dan Informatika Kwik Kian Gie, Indonesia. Author-2-Name: Tan Thing Heng Author-2-Workplace-Name: Faculty of ICT, Universitas Multimedia Nusantara, Tangerang, Indonesia Author-3-Name: Phan Ferah Author-3-Workplace-Name: Institut Bisnis dan Informatika Kwik Kian Gie, Jakarta, Indonesia)

Abstract

"Objective � The International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) No.8 adopted in Indonesian GAAP (Statement No. 5, 2012) requires a company to provide a reconciliation of the total of the reportable segments� profit or loss of the firm�s profit or loss. The objective of this standard is to improve the value relevance of information in the financial statement. This study aims to investigate the value relevance of the segment reconciliation and the determinants of segment income dissimilarity, i.e. agency cost, proprietary cost, and audit quality. Methodology/Technique � Data used in this study was a secondary data obtained from 142 manufacturing companies listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) for the period 2009 to 2013. Purposive sampling method yielded 59 firms. Two research models were used to test proposed hypotheses. Findings � The results show reconciliation of total of segments� profit or loss of the firms� profit or loss positively affects the market value of equity; this means segments� reconciliation disclosure has value relevance for the investment decisions. In addition, this paper provides evidence that audit quality negatively affects the segment income dissimilarity, while agency cost and proprietary cost have no effect. This is consistent with hypothesis that firms audited by the Big Four tend to avoid disclosure of dissimilarity between firms profit or loss and segment profit or loss. Novelty � Our findings show that audit quality (Big 4 accounting firms) plays an important role in reducing dissimilarity between the sum of segment profit and firm profit (segment profit dissimilarity)"

Suggested Citation

  • Nunung Nuryani, 2017. "Value Relevance of Firms� Reportable Segment Profit or Loss Reconciliation," GATR Journals afr140, Global Academy of Training and Research (GATR) Enterprise.
    • Handle: RePEc:gtr:gatrjs:afr140
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://gatrenterprise.com/GATRJournals/pdf_files/AFR%20Vol%202(3)%20Jul-Sep%202017/4.%20Nunung%20Nuryani%20AFR%202(3).pdf
    Download Restriction: http://gatrenterprise.com/GATRJournals/online_submission.html
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wang, Qian & Ettredge, Michael & Huang, Ying & Sun, Lili, 2011. "Strategic revelation of differences in segment earnings growth," Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(4), pages 383-392, July.
    2. Jensen, Michael C. & Meckling, William H., 1976. "Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 3(4), pages 305-360, October.
    3. Ole-Kristian Hope & Tony Kang & Wayne B Thomas & Florin Vasvari, 2009. "The effects of SFAS 131 geographic segment disclosures by US multinational companies on the valuation of foreign earnings," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 40(3), pages 421-443, April.
    4. DeAngelo, Linda Elizabeth, 1981. "Auditor size and audit quality," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 3(3), pages 183-199, December.
    5. Jenice Prather-Kinsey & Gary Meek, 2004. "The effect of revised IAS 14 on segment reporting by IAS companies," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(2), pages 213-234.
    6. Healy, Paul M. & Palepu, Krishna G., 2001. "Information asymmetry, corporate disclosure, and the capital markets: A review of the empirical disclosure literature," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 31(1-3), pages 405-440, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Faisal S. Alanezi & Mishari M. Alfraih & Saad S. Alshammari, 2016. "Operating Segments (IFRS 8)-Required Disclosure and the Specific-Characteristics of Kuwaiti Listed Companies," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 9(1), pages 136-153, January.
    2. Andy Lardon & Marc Deloof, 2014. "Financial disclosure by SMEs listed on a semi-regulated market: evidence from the Euronext Free Market," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 42(2), pages 361-385, February.
    3. Krishangi Pandey & Prakash Singh, 2023. "Does Corporate Governance and Quality of Disclosure Affect Firm Performance? An Empirical Study on Indian Banks," Metamorphosis: A Journal of Management Research, , vol. 22(2), pages 158-177, December.
    4. Sattar A. Mansi & William F. Maxwell & Darius P. Miller, 2004. "Does Auditor Quality and Tenure Matter to Investors? Evidence from the Bond Market," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(4), pages 755-793, September.
    5. MuiChing Chan & John Watson, 2011. "Voluntary Disclosure of Segment Information in a Regulated Environment: Australian Evidence," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 1(1), pages 37-53, June.
    6. Ricardo D. Brito & Eduardo P. Peres, 2006. "Does Credible Auditing Add Value?," Brazilian Business Review, Fucape Business School, vol. 3(2), pages 200-222, July.
    7. Ana Gisbert & Begoña Navallas & Domi Romero, 2014. "Proprietary costs, governance and the segment disclosure decision," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 18(3), pages 733-763, August.
    8. Li, Xudong (Daniel) & Sun, Lili & Ettredge, Michael, 2017. "Auditor selection following auditor turnover: Do peers' choices matter?," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 73-87.
    9. Dean Katselas & Jacqueline Birt & Xin Hao Kang, 2011. "International Firm Lobbying and ED 8 Operating Segments," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 21(2), pages 154-166, June.
    10. Ahmed Saleh & Ahmed Aboud & Yasser Eliwa, 2023. "IFRS 8 and the cost of capital in Europe," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(3), pages 3198-3231, July.
    11. Samudhram, Ananda & Stewart, Errol & Wickramanayake, Jayasinghe & Sinnakkannu, Jothee, 2014. "Value relevance of human capital based disclosures: Moderating effects of labor productivity, investor sentiment, analyst coverage and audit quality," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 338-353.
    12. Lopin Kuo & Po-Wen Kuo & Chun-Chih Chen, 2021. "Mandatory CSR Disclosure, CSR Assurance, and the Cost of Debt Capital: Evidence from Taiwan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-19, February.
    13. Chen, Bingyi, 2022. "Do investors value audit quality of complex estimates?," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    14. Steve Fortin & Jeffrey A. Pittman, 2007. "The Role of Auditor Choice in Debt Pricing in Private Firms," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(3), pages 859-896, September.
    15. Pinghsun Huang & Yi-Chieh Wen & Yan Zhang, 2020. "Does the monitoring effect of Big 4 audit firms really prevail? Evidence from managerial expropriation of cash assets," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 55(2), pages 739-768, August.
    16. Al-Hadi, Ahmed & Taylor, Grantley & Hossain, Mahmud, 2015. "Disaggregation, auditor conservatism and implied cost of equity capital: An international evidence from the GCC," Journal of Multinational Financial Management, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 66-98.
    17. Ahrum Choi & Jeong-Bon Kim & Jay Junghun Lee & Jong Chool Park, 2024. "Market for corporate control and demand for auditing: evidence from international M&A laws," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 29(3), pages 2753-2797, September.
    18. McCallig, John & Robb, Alastair & Rohde, Fiona, 2019. "Establishing the representational faithfulness of financial accounting information using multiparty security, network analysis and a blockchain," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 47-58.
    19. Derouiche, Imen & Jaafar, Kaouther & Zemzem, Ahmed, 2016. "Firm geographic location and voluntary disclosure," Journal of Multinational Financial Management, Elsevier, vol. 37, pages 29-47.
    20. Marc Eulerich & Christian Lohmann & Stefanie Haustein & Dirk Tunger, 2014. "Die Entwicklung der betriebswirtschaftlichen Corporate Governance-Forschung im deutschsprachigen Raum — Eine State of the Art-Analyse auf der Basis bibliometrischer Daten," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 66(7), pages 567-600, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Segment Reconciliation; Value Relevance; Agency Cost; Proprietary Cost; Audit Quality.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M41 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Accounting
    • M42 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Auditing

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gtr:gatrjs:afr140. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Prof. Dr. Abd Rahim Mohamad (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://gatrenterprise.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.