IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jappol/v30y2011i4p383-392.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Strategic revelation of differences in segment earnings growth

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, Qian
  • Ettredge, Michael
  • Huang, Ying
  • Sun, Lili

Abstract

Prior studies have theoretically and empirically documented that incentives to disclose information involve a trade-off between the benefits to the corporation of reducing information asymmetry and the costs of revealing proprietary information. This study investigates the interplay of managers' motives to conceal versus reveal cross-segment differences in earnings growth in multi-segment firms. We find that revealed segment earnings growth differences are negatively associated with proxies for proprietary costs and agency costs, and positively associated with firms' reliance on external financing. We also find that SFAS No. 131 improved the quality of segment information by requiring or allowing revelation of greater cross-segment differences in earnings growth.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, Qian & Ettredge, Michael & Huang, Ying & Sun, Lili, 2011. "Strategic revelation of differences in segment earnings growth," Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(4), pages 383-392, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jappol:v:30:y:2011:i:4:p:383-392
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0278425411000536
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Göttsche, Max & Küster, Stephan & Steindl, Tobias, 2021. "The usefulness of Non-IFRS segment data," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 43(C).
    2. Nunung Nuryani, 2017. "Value Relevance of Firms� Reportable Segment Profit or Loss Reconciliation," GATR Journals afr140, Global Academy of Training and Research (GATR) Enterprise.
    3. Roland Königsgruber & Pietro Perotti & Oliver Schinnerl & Fanis Tsoligkas & David Windisch, 2021. "Product Market Competition and Firms’ Disclosure of Cross‐segment Differences in Performance," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 57(4), pages 709-736, December.
    4. Martin Bugeja & Robert Czernkowski & Daryl Moran, 2015. "The Impact of the Management Approach on Segment Reporting," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(3-4), pages 310-366, April.
    5. Ahmed Aboud & Clare Roberts & Khaled Hussainey, 2019. "The impact of IFRS 8 on segment information quality in the European Union: a multi-dimensional analysis," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 16(2), pages 100-115, July.
    6. Stefan Dierkes & Ulrich Schäfer, 2021. "Valuation of firms with multiple business units," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 91(4), pages 401-432, May.
    7. Ahmed Saleh & Ahmed Aboud & Yasser Eliwa, 2023. "IFRS 8 and the cost of capital in Europe," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(3), pages 3198-3231, July.
    8. Aboud, Ahmed & Roberts, Clare & Mansour Zalata, Alaa, 2018. "The impact of IFRS 8 on financial analysts’ earnings forecast errors: EU evidence," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 2-17.
    9. Aboud, Ahmed & Roberts, Clare, 2018. "Managers’ segment disclosure choices under IFRS 8: EU evidence," Accounting forum, Elsevier, vol. 42(4), pages 293-308.
    10. André, Paul & Filip, Andrei & Moldovan, Rucsandra, 2016. "Segment Disclosure Quantity and Quality under IFRS 8: Determinants and the Effect on Financial Analysts' Earnings Forecast Errors," The International Journal of Accounting, Elsevier, vol. 51(4), pages 443-461.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jappol:v:30:y:2011:i:4:p:383-392. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jaccpubpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.