IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/gdk/wpaper/16.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Lisbon Strategy implementation in 12 New EU Members – multivariate analysis of structural indicators

Author

Listed:
  • Magdalena Olczyk

    (Gdansk University of Technology, Gdansk, Poland)

Abstract

The aim of this article is to identify diversity between the EU-15 and the New Members in their implementation of the Lisbon Strategy in the period 2000-2010. By analyzing a set of structural indicators, we aim to fill a gap in the literature: a lack of publications providing complex evaluation of the implementation of the Lisbon Strategy using measurable indicators. The results of our analyses confirm the hypothesis of a large gap between the EU-15 countries and the 12 New Members in key areas of the Lisbon Strategy. According to rankings given by our taxonomic analyses, a high level of the indicators selected is confirmed only for the EU-15 countries and only three New Members belong to a group presenting the average level of these indicators. This study demonstrates a need for a significant intensification of the EU cohesion policy, which is one of the main tools for achieving the Lisbon Strategy goals.

Suggested Citation

  • Magdalena Olczyk, 2013. "Lisbon Strategy implementation in 12 New EU Members – multivariate analysis of structural indicators," GUT FME Working Paper Series A 16, Faculty of Management and Economics, Gdansk University of Technology.
    • Handle: RePEc:gdk:wpaper:16
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://cdn.files.pg.edu.pl/zie/Strona%20polska/Nauka/Publikacje/Working%20Papers/WP_GUTFME_A_16.pdf
    File Function: First version, 2013
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ray Barrell & Simon Kirby, 2007. "Notes on the Lisbon process: An analysis of the impacts of reaching the Lisbon targets for skills, R&D and the administrative burden in the European Union," National Institute of Economic and Social Research (NIESR) Discussion Papers 312, National Institute of Economic and Social Research.
    2. Stefan Ederer & Jürgen Janger & Serguei Kaniovski & Daniela Kletzan-Slamanig & Johannes Berger & Ines Fortin & Helmut Hofer & Iain Paterson & Edith Skriner & Karin Schönpflug & Ulrich Schuh & Wolfgang, 2011. "Assessing the Lisbon Strategy 2005-2010 and Estimating Expected Effects from Reaching the EU 2020 Goals," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 41747, January.
    3. Destefanis, Sergio & Mastromatteo, Giuseppe, 2012. "Assessing the reassessment: A panel analysis of the Lisbon Strategy," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 115(2), pages 148-151.
    4. Arno Tausch, 2010. "The European Union’s failed “Lisbon strategy”," Society and Economy, Akadémiai Kiadó, Hungary, vol. 32(1), pages 103-121, June.
    5. Lorenzo Codogno & Guillaume Odinet & Flavio Padrini, 2009. "The Use of Targets in the Lisbon Strategy," Rivista di Politica Economica, SIPI Spa, issue 1, pages 3-21, January-M.
    6. Bea Cantillon, 2010. "Disambiguating Lisbon. Growth, Employment and Social Inclusion in the Investment State," Working Papers 1007, Herman Deleeck Centre for Social Policy, University of Antwerp.
    7. António Brandão Moniz, 2011. "From the Lisbon strategy to EU2020: illusion or progress for european economies?," IET Working Papers Series 01/2011, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, IET/CICS.NOVA-Interdisciplinary Centre on Social Sciences, Faculty of Science and Technology.
    8. Ray Barrell & Simon Kirby, 2007. "Notes on the Lisbon process: An analysis of the impacts of reaching the Lisbon targets for skills, R&D and the administrative burden in the European Union," National Institute of Economic and Social Research (NIESR) Discussion Papers 312, National Institute of Economic and Social Research.
    9. Paola Bertolini & Francesco Pagliacci, 2010. "Lisbon strategy and EU countries’ performance: social inclusion and sustainability," Department of Economics 0648, University of Modena and Reggio E., Faculty of Economics "Marco Biagi".
    10. Alfonso Arpaia & Werner Roeger & Janos Varga & Jan in 't Veld & Alexandr Hobza & Isabel Grilo & Peter Wobst, 2007. "Quantitative assessment of Structural Reforms: Modelling the Lisbon Strategy," European Economy - Economic Papers 2008 - 2015 282, Directorate General Economic and Financial Affairs (DG ECFIN), European Commission.
    11. repec:bla:jcmkts:v:46:y:2008:i::p:413-450 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Jean-Claude Barbier, 2010. ""Stratégie de Lisbonne" : les promesses sociales non tenues," Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne 10018, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne.
    13. Treidler, Oliver, 2011. "Evaluating the Lisbon strategy," Discussion Paper Series 115, Julius Maximilian University of Würzburg, Chair of Economic Order and Social Policy.
    14. Fernando Hervás Soriano & Fulvio Mulatero, 2010. "Knowledge Policy in the EU: From the Lisbon Strategy to Europe 2020," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 1(4), pages 289-302, December.
    15. Jean-Claude BARBIER, 2012. "Tracing the fate of EU “social policy”: Changes in political discourse from the “Lisbon Strategy” to “Europe 2020”," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 151(4), pages 377-399, December.
    16. Johansson, Börje & Karlsson, Charlie & Backman, Mikaela & Juusola, Pia, 2007. "The Lisbon Agenda From 2000 To 2010," Working Paper Series in Economics and Institutions of Innovation 106, Royal Institute of Technology, CESIS - Centre of Excellence for Science and Innovation Studies.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Magdalena Olczyk, 2014. "Structural Heterogeneity Between Eu 15 And 12 New Eu Members – The Obstacle To Lisbon Strategy Implementation?," Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 9(4), pages 21-43, December.
    2. Arjan Lejour & Hugo Rojas-Romagosa, 2008. "International spillovers of domestic reforms: the joint application of the Lisbon Strategy in the EU," CPB Discussion Paper 105.rdf, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
    3. Mehmet Çolak & Aylin Ege, 2013. "An Assessment of EU 2020 Strategy: Too Far to Reach?," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 110(2), pages 659-680, January.
    4. Arjan Lejour & Hugo Rojas-Romagosa, 2008. "International spillovers of domestic reforms: the joint application of the Lisbon Strategy in the EU," CPB Discussion Paper 105, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
    5. Nikos Koutsiaras, 2010. "How to Spend it: Putting a Labour Market Modernization Fund in Place of the European Globalization Adjustment Fund," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(3), pages 617-640, June.
    6. Rus Mircea-Iosif, 2013. ""The Knowledge Triangle" In A Knowledge-Based Society," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(1), pages 942-947, July.
    7. Joamets Kristi & Vasquez Maria Claudia Solarte, 2020. "Regulatory Framework of the Research-Based Approach to Education in the EU," Baltic Journal of European Studies, Sciendo, vol. 10(3), pages 109-136, December.
    8. Daragh Clancy & Rossana Merola, 2016. "ÉIRE Mod: A DSGE Model for Ireland," The Economic and Social Review, Economic and Social Studies, vol. 47(1), pages 1-31.
    9. Petri Kahila & Daniel Rauhut, 2015. "Labour Demand And Labour Market Institutions In Rural Areas," Romanian Journal of Regional Science, Romanian Regional Science Association, vol. 9(2), pages 20-38, December.
    10. Sabine Visser, 2007. "R&D in Worldscan," CPB Memorandum 189.rdf, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
    11. Annabelle Mourougane & Lukas Vogel, 2009. "Speed of Adjustment to Selected Labour Market and Tax Reforms," Comparative Economic Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Association for Comparative Economic Studies, vol. 51(4), pages 500-519, December.
    12. Anne Drumaux & Paul Joyce, 2015. "Reinventing Public Governance in Europe: The Europe 2010 Strategy," Working Papers CEB 15-014, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    13. Alka obadić & Sanja Porić, 2008. "The coordination between education and employment policies," EFZG Working Papers Series 0802, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Zagreb.
    14. Derek Clark & Tore Nilssen, 2013. "Learning by doing in contests," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 156(1), pages 329-343, July.
    15. Paola Bertolini & Enrico Giovannetti & Francesco Pagliacci, 2011. "Regional patterns in the achievement of the Lisbon Strategy: a comparison between polycentric regions and monocentric ones," Center for the Analysis of Public Policies (CAPP) 0097, Universita di Modena e Reggio Emilia, Dipartimento di Economia "Marco Biagi".
    16. Dagmar Blatná & Lenka Hudrlíková, 2014. "Analysis of Europe 2020 Indicators Using Regression Analysis [Analýza indikátorů Evropa 2020 regresní analýzou]," Acta Oeconomica Pragensia, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2014(1), pages 72-93.
    17. Tausch, Arno, 2011. "The efficiency and effectiveness of social spending in the EU-27 and the OECD – a 2011 reanalysis," MPRA Paper 33516, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    18. Barbara Annicchiarico & Fabio Di Dio & Francesco Felici, "undated". "The Macroeconomics of Europe 2020 Reform Strategy and the Potential Effects on the Italian Economy," Working Papers 8, Department of the Treasury, Ministry of the Economy and of Finance.
    19. Martina Basarac Sertic & Anita Ceh Casni & Valentina Vuckovic, 2015. "Impact of labour market reforms on economic activity in European Union: short term costs and long term benefits," Financial Theory and Practice, Institute of Public Finance, vol. 39(1), pages 83-107.
    20. Christophe Cahn & Arthur Saint-Guilhem, 2010. "Potential output growth in several industrialised countries a comparison," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 39(1), pages 139-165, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Lisbon Strategy; Lisbon targets; European Union; multivariate analysis; structural indicators;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C00 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - General - - - General
    • E60 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, and General Outlook - - - General
    • O52 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economywide Country Studies - - - Europe
    • P11 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Capitalist Economies - - - Planning, Coordination, and Reform

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gdk:wpaper:16. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wojciech Drapinski (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/wzepgpl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.