IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ora/journl/v1y2013i1p942-947.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

"The Knowledge Triangle" In A Knowledge-Based Society

Author

Listed:
  • Rus Mircea-Iosif

    (Univ. Babes Bolyai,Fac. de St. Econ. si Gest. Afacerilor, INCD URBAN INCERC Suc. Cluj-Napoca)

Abstract

The knowledge-based society is the stage where mankind is found and aims to raise the living standards of population but also to increase the level of knowledge. To achieve this latter goal, the states of the world, and especially those in the European Union, must ensure an adequate funding for its realization, and therefore in 2011 it was decided at EU level the achievement of an Innovation Union, in which are to be involved all the European countries, while to stimulate and finance research and innovation the Horizon 2020 program was proposed. The results of the Program, an "Innovation Union" have begun to be felt, so in 2011, the major companies headquartered in the European Union increased their investments in R&D by 8.9% compared to 6.1% in 2010. This increase was almost equal to that of the U.S.A. companies (9%), higher than the world average (7.6%) and superior to Japanese companies (1.5%). The sectors that used the research-development activity have tended to have increases in employment above average. I believe this information highlights the fact that the European Union may become attractive for research-development and innovation investments even for businesses outside the UE, and this can result in jobs creation and increasing competitivenees of this field of the states of the European Union. In the introductory part of the article, I have briefly presented general notions of the three component activities of the "knowledge triangle", in the second part I presented the knowledge society with several features, in the third part, I showed some provisions of the program to stimulate research and innovation Horizon 2020, in the fourth part, I presented an innovation activity connection to private enterprise and entrepreneurial initiative stimulation in the field innovation, and the conclusions shows that research does not stop with achieving the objectives and finding the outcomes research, but is it the background for further research, especially in the context of a new economy", where innovation through knowledge is the most important.

Suggested Citation

  • Rus Mircea-Iosif, 2013. ""The Knowledge Triangle" In A Knowledge-Based Society," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(1), pages 942-947, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:ora:journl:v:1:y:2013:i:1:p:942-947
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://anale.steconomiceuoradea.ro/volume/2013/n1/099.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fernando Hervás Soriano & Fulvio Mulatero, 2010. "Knowledge Policy in the EU: From the Lisbon Strategy to Europe 2020," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 1(4), pages 289-302, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Iulia-Oana FLOREA & Kamer-Ainur AIVAZ, 2022. "The Dimension of the Phenomenon of Economic Crime. A Hierarchical Classification of EU Countries at the Level of 2021," Economics and Applied Informatics, "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, issue 3, pages 125-134.
    2. Ionela Tofan & Elena Condrea, 2022. "Business performance in IT. A multivariate regression analysis," Ovidius University Annals, Economic Sciences Series, Ovidius University of Constantza, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 0(2), pages 217-226, Decembrie.
    3. Alina (Chiriac) Matei & Kamer-Ainur Aivaz, 2023. "Exploratory Analysis of Assets Nonconformities in Financial Statements," Ovidius University Annals, Economic Sciences Series, Ovidius University of Constantza, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 0(1), pages 978-985, August.
    4. Stefania-Rodica Hubel (Anghel) & Mari-Isabella Stan & Tanase Tasente, 2023. "Assessing the Role of Gender in Shaping Perceptions of Socio- Economic Issues in the Context of Sustainable Local Development: A Study on Respondents' Influence," Technium Sustainability, Technium Science, vol. 3(1), pages 76-90, June.
    5. Gabriela Iuliana Paraschiv (Ganea) & Mari-Isabella Stan, 2023. "A Brief Survey Concerning Environmental Action: The Need for Collective Engagement," Ovidius University Annals, Economic Sciences Series, Ovidius University of Constantza, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 0(1), pages 182-191, August.
    6. AIVAZ Kamer-Ainur & TOFAN Ionela, 2022. "The Synergy Between Digitalization And The Level Of Research And Business Development Allocations At Eu Level," Studies in Business and Economics, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 17(3), pages 5-17, December.
    7. Iulia-Oana FLOREA & Kamer-Ainur AIVAZ, 2022. "A Dynamic Analysis of Economic Crime in Europe: The Role of the European Institutions in the Prevention of Economic Crimes in the COVID-19 Pandemic," Economics and Applied Informatics, "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, issue 3, pages 17-28.
    8. Mircea-Iosif Rus, 2022. "The Importance and Necessity of Heritage Evaluation," Ovidius University Annals, Economic Sciences Series, Ovidius University of Constantza, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 0(2), pages 1010-1014, Decembrie.
    9. Oana-Iulia Florea & Kamer-Ainur Aivaz & Diane-Paula Vancea, 2022. "Exploratory Study on the Types of Economic Crimes at EU Level," Ovidius University Annals, Economic Sciences Series, Ovidius University of Constantza, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 0(2), pages 68-76, Decembrie.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Joamets Kristi & Vasquez Maria Claudia Solarte, 2020. "Regulatory Framework of the Research-Based Approach to Education in the EU," Baltic Journal of European Studies, Sciendo, vol. 10(3), pages 109-136, December.
    2. Magdalena Olczyk, 2014. "Structural Heterogeneity Between Eu 15 And 12 New Eu Members – The Obstacle To Lisbon Strategy Implementation?," Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 9(4), pages 21-43, December.
    3. Dagmar Blatná & Lenka Hudrlíková, 2014. "Analysis of Europe 2020 Indicators Using Regression Analysis [Analýza indikátorů Evropa 2020 regresní analýzou]," Acta Oeconomica Pragensia, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2014(1), pages 72-93.
    4. Emília DUĽOVÁ SPIŠÁKOVÁ & Ladislav MURA & BarboraGontkovičová & Zuzana Hajduová, 2017. "R&D in the Context of Europe 2020 in Selected Countries," ECONOMIC COMPUTATION AND ECONOMIC CYBERNETICS STUDIES AND RESEARCH, Faculty of Economic Cybernetics, Statistics and Informatics, vol. 51(4), pages 243-261.
    5. Adam Karbowski & Jacek Prokop, 2018. "R&D activities of enterprises, product market leadership, and collusion," Zbornik radova Ekonomskog fakulteta u Rijeci/Proceedings of Rijeka Faculty of Economics, University of Rijeka, Faculty of Economics and Business, vol. 36(2), pages 735-753.
    6. Victor Bahhouth & Christopher Ziemnowicz, 2019. "Meeting the Global Challenges of Doing Business in the Five Candidate Countries on the Road to Join the European Union," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 10(3), pages 1297-1318, September.
    7. Magdalena Olczyk, 2013. "Lisbon Strategy implementation in 12 New EU Members – multivariate analysis of structural indicators," GUT FME Working Paper Series A 16, Faculty of Management and Economics, Gdansk University of Technology.
    8. Sebastiano Cattaruzzo & Agustí Segarra-Blasco & Mercedes Teruel, 2024. "Firm-level contributions to the R&D intensity distribution: evidence and policy implications," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(1), pages 45-65, January.
    9. Karbowski, Adam, 2019. "Knowledge subsystem," EconStor Preprints 201653, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    10. Hervás Soriano, Fernando & Mulatero, Fulvio, 2011. "EU Research and Innovation (R&I) in renewable energies: The role of the Strategic Energy Technology Plan (SET-Plan)," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(6), pages 3582-3590, June.
    11. Teemu Makkonen & Timo Mitze, 2016. "Scientific collaboration between ‘old’ and ‘new’ member states: Did joining the European Union make a difference?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 106(3), pages 1193-1215, March.
    12. Prokop, Jacek & Karbowski, Adam, 2018. "R&D spillovers and cartelization of industries with differentiated products," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 11(3), pages 44-56.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    research; innovation; financing; knowledge society;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • E25 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Consumption, Saving, Production, Employment, and Investment - - - Aggregate Factor Income Distribution
    • E26 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Consumption, Saving, Production, Employment, and Investment - - - Informal Economy; Underground Economy
    • O31 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ora:journl:v:1:y:2013:i:1:p:942-947. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catalin ZMOLE (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feoraro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.