IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/fie/wpaper/1117.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

La RSE dans les relations de sous-traitance : déterminants, diffusion et changements

Author

Listed:
  • Dominique Casin

Abstract

La globalisation de l’économie a conduit les grandes entreprises ces vingt dernières années à recourir à des réseaux étendus de sous-traitants. Parallèlement, depuis les années 90 on assiste au développe-ment de la notion de responsabilité sociale des entreprises (RSE) en réaction aux pressions exercées par les différentes parties prenantes. Face à ces évolutions, le management des entreprises est devenu plus complexe puisqu’il doit concilier à la fois des exigences économiques et des exigences sociales. Nous étudions les politiques RSE dans les achats menées par trois enseignes du secteur de l’ameublement. En prenant appui sur une analyse de la littérature relative au management responsable de la chaîne d’approvisionnement, sur une étude qualitative réalisée auprès de ces trois donneurs d’ordre et sur une enquête par questionnaire visant à interroger leurs fournisseurs, cette communica-tion se propose de répondre aux questions suivantes : Quels sont les facteurs explicatifs des politiques d’achats socialement responsables ? Quels sont les changements apportés par ces démarches RSE chez les donneurs d’ordre et chez leurs sous-traitants ? Les principaux facteurs qui se dégagent de notre étude sont : la recherche de bénéfices, les valeurs organisationnelles, le leadership des dirigeants et le type de relation de sous-traitance. En effet, une même entreprise peut mettre en œuvre des stratégies différentes selon la nature de ses relations avec ses fournisseurs. A partir de là, le niveau de RSE dans les achats peut être plus ou moins élevé. Il se traduit par des pratiques, des dispositifs différents selon les entreprises et s’accompagne de changements organisationnels plus ou moins importants. Alors que les discours des donneurs d’ordre sur la RSE s’inscrivent dans une optique gagnant-gagnant, les opinions des fournisseurs sur les changements provoqués par la démarche RSE (en matière de performance, de coûts) varient au sein d’une même enseigne et d’une enseigne à l’autre.

Suggested Citation

  • Dominique Casin, 2011. "La RSE dans les relations de sous-traitance : déterminants, diffusion et changements," Cahiers du CEREFIGE 1117, CEREFIGE (Centre Europeen de Recherche en Economie Financiere et Gestion des Entreprises), Universite de Lorraine, revised 2011.
  • Handle: RePEc:fie:wpaper:1117
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://cerefige.univ-lorraine.fr/sites/cerefige.univ-lorraine.fr/files/users/11-17_cahier_recherche_d.casin_.pdf
    File Function: First version, 2011
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. James G. March, 1991. "Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 2(1), pages 71-87, February.
    2. Nacer Gasmi & Gilles Grolleau, 2005. "Nike face à la controverse éthique relative à ses sous-traitants," Revue française de gestion, Lavoisier, vol. 157(4), pages 115-136.
    3. repec:dau:papers:123456789/2577 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. repec:dau:papers:123456789/1360 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Asanuma, Banri, 1989. "Manufacturer-supplier relationships in Japan and the concept of relation-specific skill," Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, Elsevier, vol. 3(1), pages 1-30, March.
    6. Bernard Baudry, 1993. "Partenariat et sous-traitance : une approche par la théorie des incitations," Revue d'Économie Industrielle, Programme National Persée, vol. 66(1), pages 51-68.
    7. Maignan, Isabelle & Hillebrand, Bas & McAlister, Debbie, 2002. "Managing Socially-Responsible Buying:: How to Integrate Non-economic Criteria into the Purchasing Process," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 20(6), pages 641-648, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Luo, Jianxi, 2018. "Architecture and evolvability of innovation ecosystems," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 132-144.
    2. Katsuki Aoki & Miriam Wilhelm, 2017. "The Role of Ambidexterity in Managing Buyer–Supplier Relationships: The Toyota Case," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 28(6), pages 1080-1097, December.
    3. Fumihiko Isada & Yuriko Isada, 2015. "A Network Analysis Of Open Innovation In Drug Discovery," Economy & Business Journal, International Scientific Publications, Bulgaria, vol. 9(1), pages 94-110.
    4. Arman Avadikyan & Gilles Lambert & Christophe Lerch, 2016. "A Multi-Level Perspective on Ambidexterity: The Case of a Synchrotron Research Facility," Working Papers of BETA 2016-44, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
    5. Henri A. Schildt & Markku V.J. Maula & Thomas Keil, 2005. "Explorative and Exploitative Learning from External Corporate Ventures," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 29(4), pages 493-515, July.
    6. Giuliani, Elisa & Martinelli, Arianna & Rabellotti, Roberta, 2016. "Is Co-Invention Expediting Technological Catch Up? A Study of Collaboration between Emerging Country Firms and EU Inventors," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 192-205.
    7. Insoo Cho & Peter F. Orazem, 2021. "How endogenous risk preferences and sample selection affect analysis of firm survival," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 56(4), pages 1309-1332, April.
    8. Tomasz Helbin & Amy Van Looy, 2021. "Is Business Process Management (BPM) Ready for Ambidexterity? Conceptualization, Implementation Guidelines and Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-25, February.
    9. Son K. Lam & Thomas E. DeCarlo & Ashish Sharma, 2019. "Salesperson ambidexterity in customer engagement: do customer base characteristics matter?," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 47(4), pages 659-680, July.
    10. Alan Hevner & Isabelle Comyn-Wattiau & Jacky Akoka & Nicolas Prat, 2018. "A pragmatic approach for identifying and managing design science research goals and evaluation criteria," Post-Print hal-02283783, HAL.
    11. Jonathan H. Reed, 2022. "Operational and strategic change during temporary turbulence: evidence from the COVID-19 pandemic," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 589-608, June.
    12. Felipe A. Csaszar & Nicolaj Siggelkow, 2010. "How Much to Copy? Determinants of Effective Imitation Breadth," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 21(3), pages 661-676, June.
    13. Bruneel, Johan & Clarysse, Bart & Bobelyn, Annelies & Wright, Mike, 2020. "Liquidity events and VC-backed academic spin-offs: The role of search alliances," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(10).
    14. Sjauw-Koen-Fa, August R. & Blok, Vincent & Omta, S.W.F. (Onno), 2016. "Critical Success Factors for Smallholder Inclusion in High Value-Adding Supply Chains by Food & Agribusiness Multinational Enterprise," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 19(1), pages 1-30, February.
    15. Sylvie Héroux & Mélanie Roussy, 2020. "Three cases of compliance with governance regulation: an organizational learning perspective," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 24(2), pages 449-479, June.
    16. Anne Corcos & Yorgos Rizopoulos, 2011. "Is prosocial behavior egocentric? The “invisible hand” of emotions," Post-Print halshs-01968213, HAL.
    17. Freeman, Steven F., 1997. "Good decisions : reconciling human rationality, evolution, and ethics," Working papers WP 3962-97., Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Sloan School of Management.
    18. Zhang, Feng & Jiang, Guohua & Cantwell, John A., 2015. "Subsidiary exploration and the innovative performance of large multinational corporations," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 24(2), pages 224-234.
    19. Avimanyu Datta, 2016. "Antecedents To Radical Innovations: A Longitudinal Look At Firms In The Information Technology Industry By Aggregation Of Patents," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 20(07), pages 1-31, October.
    20. Liu, Zhiqiang & Yan, Miao & Fan, Youqing & Chen, Liling, 2021. "Ascribed or achieved? The role of birth order on innovative behaviour in the workplace," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 480-492.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fie:wpaper:1117. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sebastien Liarte (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/grnanfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.