IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/fem/femwpa/2005.144.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Social Carrying Capacity of Mass Tourist Sites: Theoretical and Practical Issues about its Measurement

Author

Listed:
  • Silvia Marzetti

    (University of Bologna)

  • R. Mosetti

    (Istituto Nazionale di Oceanografia e Geofisica Sperimentale, OGS)

Abstract

Congestion is an important management problem at mass tourist sites. This essay focuses on the social carrying capacity (SCC) of a tourist site as indicator of residents’ and visitors’ perception of crowding, intended as the maximum number of visitors (MNV) tolerated. In case of conflict between the residents’ MNV tolerated and the visitors’ MNV tolerated, the policy-maker has to mediate. We consider the case in which the residents’ SCC is lower than the visitors’ SCC, and the site SCC is the result of a compromise between these two aspects of the SCC. This can be measured by making reference to two criteria of choice: the utility maximisation criterion and the voting rule. The use of one method rather than the other depends on the data available about the individual preferences on crowding. Assuming that individual preferences are known, a maximisation model for the computation of the site SCC is conceived. It represents the case in which the residents’ SCC is the limiting factor. The site SCC is intended as the number of visitors which maximises the social welfare function. Because a local policy-maker maximises the welfare of residents, in this model visitors are represented by those residents whose welfare wholly depends on the tourism sector, while the social costs due to crowding are borne by those residents who are partially or totally independent from tourism. Nevertheless, in practice, the individual preferences about crowding are not always known. In this case, the MNV tolerated can be computed by applying the majority voting rule. It is shown that, under certain conditions, the optimum number of visitors, obtained through a maximisation model, is equal to the MNV tolerated by the majority of voters.

Suggested Citation

  • Silvia Marzetti & R. Mosetti, 2005. "Social Carrying Capacity of Mass Tourist Sites: Theoretical and Practical Issues about its Measurement," Working Papers 2005.144, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
  • Handle: RePEc:fem:femwpa:2005.144
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://feem-media.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/NDL2005-144.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bernadette G. Gumba & Arnold S.M, 2022. "Physical Carrying Capacity of Selected Tourism Sites and Social Opportunity for Local Resident Tourists in the Philippines," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 6(6), pages 56-61, June.
    2. Mota Luís & Franco Mara & Santos Rossana, 2021. "Social Carrying Capacity in Island Destinations: Interpreting Visitors’ Opinions in Madeira Island," European Journal of Tourism, Hospitality and Recreation, Sciendo, vol. 11(2), pages 253-266, December.
    3. Clara Cicatiello & Giulia Avolio & Silvio Franco & Marco Valente, 2014. "Dal prodotto turistico allo sviluppo locale delle aree rurali: il caso di civita di Bagnoregio," MERCATI & COMPETITIVIT?, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2014(4), pages 39-62.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Sustainable tourism development; Tourism carrying capacity; Social carrying capacity; Maximisation criterion; Majority voting rule; Overcrowding; Mass tourist site;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • L83 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Services - - - Sports; Gambling; Restaurants; Recreation; Tourism
    • Q01 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - General - - - Sustainable Development
    • Q26 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Renewable Resources and Conservation - - - Recreational Aspects of Natural Resources
    • Q58 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environmental Economics: Government Policy

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fem:femwpa:2005.144. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Alberto Prina Cerai (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feemmit.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.