IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/feb/natura/00790.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Megastudy shows that reminders boost vaccination but adding free rides does not

Author

Listed:
  • Katherine Milkman
  • Sean Ellis
  • Dena Gromet
  • Youngwoo Jung
  • Alex Luscher
  • Rayyan Mobarak
  • Madeline Paxson
  • Ramon Silvera Zumaran
  • Robert Kuan
  • Ron Berman
  • Neil Lewis Jr
  • John List
  • Mitesh Patel
  • Christophe Van den Bulte
  • Kevin Volpp
  • Maryann Beauvais
  • Jonathon Bellows
  • Cheryl Marandola
  • Angela Duckworth

Abstract

Encouraging routine COVID-19 vaccinations will probably be a crucial policy challenge for decades to come. To avert hundreds of thousands of unnecessary hospitalizations and deaths, adoption will need to be higher than it was in the autumn of 2022 or 2023, when less than one-fifth of Americans received booster vaccines. One approach to encourage vaccination is to eliminate the friction of transportation hurdles. Previous research has shown that friction can hinder follow-through and that individuals who live farther from COVID-19 vaccination sites are less likely to get vaccinated. However, the value of providing free round-trip transportation to vaccination sites is unknown. Here we show that offering people free round-trip Lyft rides to pharmacies has no benefit over and above sending them behaviourally informed text messages reminding them to get vaccinated. We determined this by running a megastudy with millions of CVS Pharmacy customers in the United States testing two effects: free round-trip Lyft rides to CVS Pharmacies for vaccination appointments, and seven different sets of behaviourally informed vaccine reminder messages. Our results suggest that offering previously vaccinated individuals free rides to vaccination sites is not a good investment in the United States, which is contrary to the high expectations of both expert and lay forecasters. Instead, people in the United States should be sent behaviourally informed COVID-19 vaccination reminders, which increased the 30-day COVID-19 booster uptake by 21% (1.05 percentage points) and spilled over to increase 30-day influenza vaccinations by 8% (0.34 percentage points) in our megastudy. More rigorous testing of interventions to promote vaccination is needed to ensure that evidence-based solutions are deployed widely and that ineffective but intuitively appealing tools are discontinued.

Suggested Citation

  • Katherine Milkman & Sean Ellis & Dena Gromet & Youngwoo Jung & Alex Luscher & Rayyan Mobarak & Madeline Paxson & Ramon Silvera Zumaran & Robert Kuan & Ron Berman & Neil Lewis Jr & John List & Mitesh P, 2024. "Megastudy shows that reminders boost vaccination but adding free rides does not," Natural Field Experiments 00790, The Field Experiments Website.
  • Handle: RePEc:feb:natura:00790
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://s3.amazonaws.com/fieldexperiments-papers2/papers/00790.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:feb:natura:00790. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Francesca Pagnotta (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.fieldexperiments.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.