IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/fcr/wpaper/202103.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Productive and unproductive labor: Marx´s positions on personal services

Author

Listed:
  • Adolfo Rodríguez Herrera

    (Universidad de Costa Rica)

Abstract

In Marx´s texts we can recognize three positions on the concept of productive labor, arising from his critique of Smith. These positions are incompatible with each other when considering the labor that provides personal services, of growing importance in contemporary capitalism. A return to the foundations of Marx´s theory of value is necessary to understand the concept of productive labor and to decipher one of the main determinants of value transfers between sectors and regions and of the ever-increasing inequality

Suggested Citation

  • Adolfo Rodríguez Herrera, 2021. "Productive and unproductive labor: Marx´s positions on personal services," Working Papers 202103, Universidad de Costa Rica, revised Mar 2021.
    • Handle: RePEc:fcr:wpaper:202103
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://economia.ucr.ac.cr/sites/default/files/2021-11/EE%20UCR%20SDT%2021-03.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Herbert Gintis & Samuel Bowles, 1981. "Structure and Practice in the Labor Theory of Value," Review of Radical Political Economics, Union for Radical Political Economics, vol. 12(4), pages 1-26, January.
    2. Simon Mohun, 1996. "Productive and Unproductive Labor in the Labor Theory of Value," Review of Radical Political Economics, Union for Radical Political Economics, vol. 28(4), pages 30-54, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tadasu Matsuo, 2008. "Profit, Surplus Product, Exploitation And Less Than Maximized Utility: A New Equivalence Proposition On The Fundamental Marxian Theorem," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(2), pages 249-265, May.
    2. Veneziani, Roberto & Yoshihara, Naoki, 2014. "One million miles to go: taking the axiomatic road to defining exploitation," UMASS Amherst Economics Working Papers 2014-10, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Department of Economics.
    3. Howard Sherman, 2002. "Marxist Institutionalism," Review of Social Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 60(4), pages 603-608.
    4. Roberto Veneziani & Luca Zamparelli & Naoki Yoshihara, 2017. "A Progress Report On Marxian Economic Theory: On The Controversies In Exploitation Theory Since Okishio (1963)," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(5), pages 1421-1448, December.
    5. Spencer, David A, 2000. "The Demise of Radical Political Economics? An Essay on the Evolution of a Theory of Capitalist Production," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 24(5), pages 543-564, September.
    6. Jonathan F. Cogliano, 2017. "Surplus Value Production and Realization in Marxian Theory - Applications to the U.S., 1987-2015," Working Paper Series 2017-01, Dickinson College, Department of Economics.
    7. Takao Fujimoto & Yukihiko Fujita, 2008. "A Refutation Of The Commodity Exploitation Theorem," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(3), pages 530-540, July.
    8. Theodore Mariolis & George Soklis & Eugenia Zouvela, 2013. "Testing Böhm-Bawerk’s theory of capital: Some evidence from the Finnish economy," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 26(2), pages 207-220, June.
    9. Gilbert L. Skillman, 2017. "Marx’s Capital through the lens of Roemer’s General Theory (and vice-versa)," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 49(3), pages 423-443, December.
    10. repec:ums:papers:2014-010 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Howard J. Sherman, 1990. "Cyclical Behavior of the Labor Share," Review of Radical Political Economics, Union for Radical Political Economics, vol. 22(2-3), pages 92-112, June.
    12. François Combarnous, 1994. "Discrimination et marché du travail : concepts et théories," Documents de travail 02, Groupe d'Economie du Développement de l'Université Montesquieu Bordeaux IV.
    13. Adem Y. Elveren & Sara Hsu, 2016. "Military Expenditures and Profit Rates: Evidence from OECD Countries," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 67(3), pages 551-577, July.
    14. Edvinsson, Rodney, 2016. "What are production, work and consumption? Trans-historical re-conceptualisations," Stockholm Papers in Economic History 19, Stockholm University, Department of Economic History.
    15. McMahon, James, 2015. "What Makes Hollywood Run? Capitalist Power, Risk and the Control of Social Creativity," EconStor Theses, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, number 157994, September.
    16. Yoshihara, Naoki & 吉原, 直毅 & ヨシハラ, ナオキ & Roberto Veneziani, 2011. "Exploitation of Labour and Exploitation of Commodities: A "New Interpretation"," Discussion Paper Series 556, Institute of Economic Research, Hitotsubashi University.
    17. Hyun Woong Park & Dong-Min Rieu, 2020. "A Mathematical Formulation of the Dual Nature of Unproductive Labor," Review of Radical Political Economics, Union for Radical Political Economics, vol. 52(4), pages 716-738, December.
    18. Freeman, Alan, 2012. "The Profit Rate in the Presence of Financial Markets: a Necessary Correction," MPRA Paper 52625, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 01 Jul 2012.
    19. PARYS, Wilfried, 2018. "Labour values and energy values," Working Papers 2018006, University of Antwerp, Faculty of Business and Economics.
    20. Yoshihara, Naoki, 2010. "Class and exploitation in general convex cone economies," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 75(2), pages 281-296, August.
    21. Thomas E. LAMBERT, 2016. "Monopoly Capital and Capitalist Inequality: Marx after Piketty," Journal of Economics and Political Economy, KSP Journals, vol. 3(1), pages 151-159, March.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fcr:wpaper:202103. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Juan Manuel Castro (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feucrcr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.