IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ess/wpaper/id2156.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Understanding the Relationship between Government and BRAC in Implementing WASH Programme

Author

Listed:
  • Shamim Ahmed

Abstract

To explore the relationship between government and BRAC in the implementation of Water, Sanitation and Hygiene (WASH) programme this qualitative research was undertaken. This involved purposive sampling of programme sites for conducting semi-structured focus group discussions. The government and BRAC staff were interviewed at different locations to find out different dimensions of relationship. [BRAC-RED WP No. 2]

Suggested Citation

  • Shamim Ahmed, 2009. "Understanding the Relationship between Government and BRAC in Implementing WASH Programme," Working Papers id:2156, eSocialSciences.
    • Handle: RePEc:ess:wpaper:id:2156
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.eSocialSciences.com/data/articles/Document1682009500.1626703.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. R. Alsop & R. Khandelwal & E. Gilbert & J. Farrington, 1996. "The human capital dimension of collaboration among government, NGOs, and farm families: Comparative advantage, complications, and observations from an Indian case," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 13(2), pages 3-12, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. William Lacy, 1996. "Research, extension, and user partnerships: Models for collaboration and strategies for change," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 13(2), pages 33-41, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    BRAC; WASH; water; sanitation; hygiene; focus group discussions; relationship; qualitative research; safe water; underprivileged groups; Bangladesh;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ess:wpaper:id:2156. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Padma Prakash (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.esocialsciences.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.