IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ese/iserwp/2001-04.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The National Statistics Socio-economic Classification: unifying official and sociological approaches to the conceptualisation and measurement of social class

Author

Listed:
  • Rose, David
  • J. Pevalin, David

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Rose, David & J. Pevalin, David, 2001. "The National Statistics Socio-economic Classification: unifying official and sociological approaches to the conceptualisation and measurement of social class," ISER Working Paper Series 2001-04, Institute for Social and Economic Research.
    • Handle: RePEc:ese:iserwp:2001-04
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.iser.essex.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/files/working-papers/iser/2001-04.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Meirav Aharon-Gutman & David Burg, 2021. "How 3D visualization can help us understand spatial inequality: On social distance and crime," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 48(4), pages 793-809, May.
    2. Aksoy, Cevat Giray & Carpenter, Christopher S. & Frank, Jeff & Huffman, Matt L., 2019. "Gay glass ceilings: Sexual orientation and workplace authority in the UK," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 167-180.
    3. Chris Warhurst & Dennis Nickson, 2007. "A new labour aristocracy? Aesthetic labour and routine interactive service," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 21(4), pages 785-798, December.
    4. Pauline Anderson, 2009. "Intermediate occupations and the conceptual and empirical limitations of the hourglass economy thesis," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 23(1), pages 169-180, March.
    5. Adamecz-Völgyi, Anna & Henderson, Morag & Shure, Nikki, 2020. "Is ‘first in family’ a good indicator for widening university participation?," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ese:iserwp:2001-04. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Jonathan Nears (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rcessuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.