IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/erg/wpaper/1039.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Impact of Institutional Blockholders on Voluntary Disclosure and Transparency: The Case of Egypt

Author

Listed:
  • Doaa El-Diftar
  • Eleri Jones
  • Mohamed Moustafa Soliman

Abstract

Disclosure and transparency are crucial elements in the improvement of overall corporate governance. Disclosure is a very important mean of communication between management and outside investors. This study investigates how institutional blockholders impact levels of voluntary disclosure released in annual reports of some of the most active companies in the Egyptian Stock Exchange. The results generated by the study did support a significant positive impact of institutional blockholders on voluntary disclosure and transparency. It also found that this impact is due to two types of institutional blockholders’ ownership: low institutional ownership defined as those owning from five to twenty percent and controlling institutions defined as those owning more than fifty percent of a company’s shares. This indicates that concentrated ownership can be viewed as a monitoring mechanism in an emerging market like Egypt. According to the author’s knowledge, this study is the first to explore the impact of different categories of blockholders; categorized by the size of their block; on levels of voluntary disclosure in Egypt.

Suggested Citation

  • Doaa El-Diftar & Eleri Jones & Mohamed Moustafa Soliman, 2016. "The Impact of Institutional Blockholders on Voluntary Disclosure and Transparency: The Case of Egypt," Working Papers 1039, Economic Research Forum, revised Aug 2016.
    • Handle: RePEc:erg:wpaper:1039
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://erf.org.eg/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/1039.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://bit.ly/2bAqeoa
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anil K. Makhija & James M. Patton, 2004. "The Impact of Firm Ownership Structure on Voluntary Disclosure: Empirical Evidence from Czech Annual Reports," The Journal of Business, University of Chicago Press, vol. 77(3), pages 457-492, July.
    2. Eng, L. L. & Mak, Y. T., 2003. "Corporate governance and voluntary disclosure," Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Elsevier, vol. 22(4), pages 325-345.
    3. Shleifer, Andrei & Vishny, Robert W, 1997. "A Survey of Corporate Governance," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 52(2), pages 737-783, June.
    4. Ronen, Joshua & Yaari, Varda (Lewinstein), 2002. "Incentives for voluntary disclosure," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, vol. 5(3), pages 349-390, July.
    5. Abdur ROUF & Abdullah-Al HARUN, 2011. "Ownership Structure And Voluntary Disclosure In Annual Reports Of Bangladesh," Review of Economic and Business Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, issue 7, pages 239-251, May.
    6. Patel, Sandeep A. & Balic, Amra & Bwakira, Liliane, 2002. "Measuring transparency and disclosure at firm-level in emerging markets," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 3(4), pages 325-337, December.
    7. Lee Shin-Ping & Chuang Tsung-Hsien, 2009. "The determinants of corporate performance: A viewpoint from insider ownership and institutional ownership," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 24(3), pages 233-247, March.
    8. Mathew Tsamenyi & Elsie Enninful-Adu & Joseph Onumah, 2007. "Disclosure and corporate governance in developing countries: evidence from Ghana," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 22(3), pages 319-334, March.
    9. Mauricio Jara-Bertin & F鬩x J. López-Iturriaga & Óscar López-de-Foronda, 2012. "Does the influence of institutional investors depend on the institutional framework? An international analysis," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(3), pages 265-278, January.
    10. R.M. Haniffa & T. E. Cooke, 2002. "Culture, Corporate Governance and Disclosure in Malaysian Corporations," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 38(3), pages 317-349, October.
    11. Healy, Paul M. & Palepu, Krishna G., 2001. "Information asymmetry, corporate disclosure, and the capital markets: A review of the empirical disclosure literature," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 31(1-3), pages 405-440, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ahnaf Ali Alsmady, 2018. "Ownership Structure and its Endogeneity Effect on the Quality of Financial Reporting," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 8(3), pages 509-526, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hichem Khlif & Kamran Ahmed & Mohsen Souissi, 2017. "Ownership structure and voluntary disclosure: A synthesis of empirical studies," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 42(3), pages 376-403, August.
    2. Araniyar C. Isukul & John J. Chizea, 2017. "Corporate Governance Disclosure in Developing Countries: A Comparative Analysis in Nigerian and South African Banks," SAGE Open, , vol. 7(3), pages 21582440177, July.
    3. Ayman Haddad & Wasim AlShattarat & Naser AbuGhazaleh & Haitham Nobanee, 2015. "The impact of ownership structure and family board domination on voluntary disclosure for Jordanian listed companies," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 5(2), pages 203-234, December.
    4. Ray Donnelly & Mark Mulcahy, 2008. "Board Structure, Ownership, and Voluntary Disclosure in Ireland," Corporate Governance: An International Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 16(5), pages 416-429, September.
    5. Rupjyoti Saha & K. C. Kabra, 2020. "Corporate Governance and Voluntary Disclosure: A Synthesis of Empirical Studies," Business Perspectives and Research, , vol. 8(2), pages 117-138, July.
    6. Collins G. Ntim & Kwaku K. Opong & Jo Danbolt & Dennis A. Thomas, 2012. "Voluntary corporate governance disclosures by post‐Apartheid South African corporations," Journal of Applied Accounting Research, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 13(2), pages 122-144, September.
    7. Cristina Alexandrina Stefanescu, 2013. "How Do Ownership Features Affect Corporate Governance Disclosure ? - The Case of Banking System," Acta Universitatis Danubius. OEconomica, Danubius University of Galati, issue 9(2), pages 37-51, April.
    8. Roshayani Arshad & Rohaya Md Nor & Nur Adura Ahmad Noruddin, 2011. "Ownership Structure And Interaction Effects Of Firm Performance On Management Commentary Disclosures," Journal of Global Management, Global Research Agency, vol. 2(2), pages 124-145, July.
    9. Khaleed Omair Alotaibi & Khaled Hussainey, 2016. "Determinants of CSR disclosure quantity and quality: Evidence from non-financial listed firms in Saudi Arabia," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 13(4), pages 364-393, November.
    10. Gisbert, Ana & Navallas, Begoña, 2013. "The association between voluntary disclosure and corporate governance in the presence of severe agency conflicts," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 286-298.
    11. Al-Akra, Mahmoud & Eddie, Ian A. & Ali, Muhammad Jahangir, 2010. "The influence of the introduction of accounting disclosure regulation on mandatory disclosure compliance: Evidence from Jordan," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 42(3), pages 170-186.
    12. Roshayani Arshad Author_Email: roshayani@salam.uitm.edu.my & Rohaya Md Nor & Nur Adura Ahmad Noruddin, 2011. "Ownership Structure And Interaction Effects Of Firm Performance On Management Commentary Disclosures," 2nd International Conference on Business and Economic Research (2nd ICBER 2011) Proceeding 2011-332, Conference Master Resources.
    13. Nicola Raimo & Filippo Vitolla & Arcangelo Marrone & Michele Rubino, 2020. "The role of ownership structure in integrated reporting policies," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(6), pages 2238-2250, September.
    14. Marco Allegrini & Giulio Greco, 2013. "Corporate boards, audit committees and voluntary disclosure: evidence from Italian Listed Companies," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 17(1), pages 187-216, February.
    15. Vera Lucia M. Cunha & M. Dinis Mendes, 2017. "Financial Determinants of Corporate Governance Disclosure: Portuguese Evidence," Athens Journal of Business & Economics, Athens Institute for Education and Research (ATINER), vol. 3(1), pages 21-36, January.
    16. Muhammad Yar Khan & Anam Javeed & Ly Kim Cuong & Ha Pham, 2020. "Corporate Governance and Cost of Capital: Evidence from Emerging Market," Risks, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-29, October.
    17. Ahmed A. Elamer & Collins G. Ntim & Hussein A. Abdou & Alaa Mansour Zalata & Mohamed Elmagrhi, 2019. "The impact of multi-layer governance on bank risk disclosure in emerging markets: the case of Middle East and North Africa," Accounting Forum, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(2), pages 246-281, April.
    18. Lopes, Patricia Teixeira & Rodrigues, Lucia Lima, 2007. "Accounting for financial instruments: An analysis of the determinants of disclosure in the Portuguese stock exchange," The International Journal of Accounting, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 25-56.
    19. Carlo Regoliosi & Alessandro d’Eri, 2014. "“Good” corporate governance and the quality of internal auditing departments in Italian listed firms. An exploratory investigation in Italian listed firms," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 18(3), pages 891-920, August.
    20. Adriana Tiron-Tudor & Rares Hurghis & Ramona Lacurezeanu & Lucia Podoaba, 2020. "The Level of European Companies’ Integrated Reports Alignment to the Framework: The Role of Boards’ Characteristics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-16, October.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:erg:wpaper:1039. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sherine Ghoneim (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/erfaceg.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.