IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/eps/cepswp/36180.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Low-carbon technologies and Russian imports: How far can recycling reduce the EU's raw materials dependency?

Author

Listed:
  • Rizos, Vasileios
  • Righetti, Edoardo

Abstract

The term ‘strategic autonomy’ denotes the political goal of building a self-reliant EU economy with limited exposure to supply disruptions, like those stemming from the Covid-19 crisis. Securing access to the non-energy minerals required for building a new industrial ecosystem consistent with the EU’s decarbonisation objectives is important to achieving this goal. Rising demand for these materials has created an arena for geopolitical competition. Moreover, the war in Ukraine has brought forward the need to take a closer look at the external supply of minerals, including from Russia, and potential risks involved. This Policy Insight first provides a brief overview of EU import dependency on raw materials and Russia’s share among EU sources of key supplies for low-carbon technologies. It then looks at prospects for meeting future material demands though circularity for three technologies, namely lithium-ion batteries, wind turbines and fuel cell electric vehicles. The analysis is based on two scenarios with different levels of ambition. They aim to give an indication of the scale of potential benefits that can be achieved through circularity and recycling approaches for components and materials used in these technologies. The estimates suggest that establishing collection and recycling facilities in the EU, through the appropriate policy frameworks in place, can contribute to meeting future EU material demands for them and reduce import dependency. Still, recycling alone will not suffice to cover the increasing material requirements. Other options will therefore need to be considered, including developing strategic partnerships and joint projects with resource-rich countries (also in light of efforts to cut economic ties with Russia). The EU will further need to source from its own mining reserves, seek improvements in material efficiency and foster material substitution options where possible.

Suggested Citation

  • Rizos, Vasileios & Righetti, Edoardo, 2022. "Low-carbon technologies and Russian imports: How far can recycling reduce the EU's raw materials dependency?," CEPS Papers 36180, Centre for European Policy Studies.
  • Handle: RePEc:eps:cepswp:36180
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ceps.eu/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/CEPS-PI2022-17_Low-carbon-technologies-and-Russian-imports.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bartekova, Eva & Kemp, Rene, 2016. "Critical raw material strategies in different world regions," MERIT Working Papers 2016-005, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    2. Alexey Cherepovitsyn & Victoria Solovyova, 2022. "Prospects for the Development of the Russian Rare-Earth Metal Industry in View of the Global Energy Transition—A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-24, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hu, Xueyue & Wang, Chunying & Elshkaki, Ayman, 2024. "Material-energy Nexus: A systematic literature review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    2. Cherepovitsyn, Alexey & Solovyova, Victoria & Dmitrieva, Diana, 2023. "New challenges for the sustainable development of the rare-earth metals sector in Russia: Transforming industrial policies," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    3. Yang, Xiaoming & Islam, Md. Monirul & Mentel, Grzegorz & Ahmad, Ashfaq & Vasa, László, 2024. "Synergistic dynamics unveiled: Interplay between rare earth prices, clean energy innovations, and tech companies' market resilience amidst the Covid-19 pandemic and Russia-Ukraine conflict," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    4. Werner, Tim T. & Mudd, Gavin M. & Jowitt, Simon M. & Huston, David, 2023. "Rhenium mineral resources: A global assessment," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    5. Seck, Gondia Sokhna & Hache, Emmanuel & Barnet, Charlène, 2022. "Potential bottleneck in the energy transition: The case of cobalt in an accelerating electro-mobility world," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    6. Gao, Wang & Wei, Jiajia & Zhang, Hongwei & Zhang, Haizhen, 2024. "Does climate policy uncertainty exacerbate extreme risk spillovers between green economy and energy metals?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    7. Liudmila Reshetnikova & Natalia Boldyreva & Anton Devyatkov & Zhanna Pisarenko & Danila Ovechkin, 2023. "Carbon Pricing in Current Global Institutional Changes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-19, February.
    8. Qing Guo & Zishan Mai, 2022. "A Comparative Study on the Export Competitiveness of Rare Earth Products from China, the United States, Russia and India," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-31, September.
    9. Zhu, Mingxue & Zhou, Xuanru & Zhang, Hua & Wang, Lu & Sun, Haoyu, 2023. "International trade evolution and competition prediction of boron ore: Based on complex network and link prediction," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    10. Koyamparambath, Anish & Santillán-Saldivar, Jair & McLellan, Benjamin & Sonnemann, Guido, 2022. "Supply risk evolution of raw materials for batteries and fossil fuels for selected OECD countries (2000–2018)," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    11. Marco Giovagnoli, 2016. "Le Terre Rare. Questioni geopolitiche, economiche e ambientali," PRISMA Economia - Societ? - Lavoro, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2016(1), pages 115-161.
    12. Marek Szarucki & Radosław Rybkowski & Justyna Bugaj & Klaudia Bracio, 2022. "A Comprehensive Review of Research Approaches in the Energy Sector: A Management Sciences Perspective," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-21, November.
    13. Imholte, D.D. & Nguyen, R.T. & Vedantam, A. & Brown, M. & Iyer, A. & Smith, B.J. & Collins, J.W. & Anderson, C.G. & O’Kelley, B., 2018. "An assessment of U.S. rare earth availability for supporting U.S. wind energy growth targets," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 294-305.
    14. Islam, Md. Monirul & Sohag, Kazi & Berezin, Andrey & Sergi, Bruno S., 2024. "Factor proportions model for Russian mineral supply-driven global energy transition: Does externality matter?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eps:cepswp:36180. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Margarita Minkova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepssbe.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.