IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ems/eureir/1649.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Scheduling train crews: a case study for the Dutch Railways

Author

Listed:
  • Freling, R.
  • Lentink, R.M.
  • Odijk, M.A.

Abstract

In this paper the problem of scheduling train crew is considered. We discuss a general framework of which the method for solving the train crew scheduling problem is a special case. In particular, our method is a heuristic branch-and-price algorithm suitable for large scale crew scheduling problems. This algorithm is applied to a real life train guard scheduling problem which is provided to us by the Dutch Railways. Computational results show that our algorithm is capable of getting sub-optimal solutions for a large scale instance within reasonable computation time.

Suggested Citation

  • Freling, R. & Lentink, R.M. & Odijk, M.A., 2000. "Scheduling train crews: a case study for the Dutch Railways," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI 2000-17/A, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
    • Handle: RePEc:ems:eureir:1649
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://repub.eur.nl/pub/1649/feweco20000510163950.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michel Gamache & François Soumis & Gérald Marquis & Jacques Desrosiers, 1999. "A Column Generation Approach for Large-Scale Aircrew Rostering Problems," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 47(2), pages 247-263, April.
    2. Cynthia Barnhart & Ellis L. Johnson & George L. Nemhauser & Martin W. P. Savelsbergh & Pamela H. Vance, 1998. "Branch-and-Price: Column Generation for Solving Huge Integer Programs," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 46(3), pages 316-329, June.
    3. Freling, R. & Huisman, D. & Wagelmans, A.P.M., 2000. "Applying an Integrated Approach to Vehicle and Crew Scheduling in Practice," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2000-31-LIS, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lentink, R.M. & Odijk, M.A. & van Rijn, E., 2002. "Crew Rostering for the High Speed Train," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2002-07-LIS, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    2. Şahin, Güvenç & Yüceoğlu, Birol, 2011. "Tactical crew planning in railways," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 47(6), pages 1221-1243.
    3. Y. Wang (Ying) & Z. Shang (Zheming) & Huisman, D. & D'Ariano, A. & J.C. Zhang (Jinchuan), 2018. "A Lagrangian Relaxation Approach Based on a Time-Space-State Network for Railway Crew Scheduling," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI2018-45, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
    4. Christian Rählmann & Ulrich W. Thonemann, 2020. "Railway crew scheduling with semi-flexible timetables," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 42(4), pages 835-862, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jing-Quan Li, 2014. "Transit Bus Scheduling with Limited Energy," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 48(4), pages 521-539, November.
    2. Maenhout, Broos & Vanhoucke, Mario, 2010. "A hybrid scatter search heuristic for personalized crew rostering in the airline industry," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 206(1), pages 155-167, October.
    3. Silke Jütte & Marc Albers & Ulrich W. Thonemann & Knut Haase, 2011. "Optimizing Railway Crew Scheduling at DB Schenker," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 41(2), pages 109-122, April.
    4. Stefan Irnich & Daniel Villeneuve, 2006. "The Shortest-Path Problem with Resource Constraints and k -Cycle Elimination for k (ge) 3," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 18(3), pages 391-406, August.
    5. Stefan Irnich & Guy Desaulniers & Jacques Desrosiers & Ahmed Hadjar, 2010. "Path-Reduced Costs for Eliminating Arcs in Routing and Scheduling," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 22(2), pages 297-313, May.
    6. Knut Haase & Guy Desaulniers & Jacques Desrosiers, 2001. "Simultaneous Vehicle and Crew Scheduling in Urban Mass Transit Systems," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(3), pages 286-303, August.
    7. Eveborn, Patrik & Flisberg, Patrik & Ronnqvist, Mikael, 2006. "Laps Care--an operational system for staff planning of home care," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 171(3), pages 962-976, June.
    8. Pan, Hanchuan & Liu, Zhigang & Yang, Lixing & Liang, Zhe & Wu, Qiang & Li, Sijie, 2021. "A column generation-based approach for integrated vehicle and crew scheduling on a single metro line with the fully automatic operation system by partial supervision," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    9. Wen, Xin & Chung, Sai-Ho & Ji, Ping & Sheu, Jiuh-Biing, 2022. "Individual scheduling approach for multi-class airline cabin crew with manpower requirement heterogeneity," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    10. Omar Foutlane & Issmail Hallaoui & Pierre Hansen, 2022. "Distributed Integral Column Generation for Set Partitioning Problems," SN Operations Research Forum, Springer, vol. 3(2), pages 1-22, June.
    11. Abdelouahab Zaghrouti & Issmail El Hallaoui & François Soumis, 2020. "Improving set partitioning problem solutions by zooming around an improving direction," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 284(2), pages 645-671, January.
    12. Boubaker, Khaled & Desaulniers, Guy & Elhallaoui, Issmail, 2010. "Bidline scheduling with equity by heuristic dynamic constraint aggregation," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 50-61, January.
    13. Marco E. Lübbecke & Jacques Desrosiers, 2005. "Selected Topics in Column Generation," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 53(6), pages 1007-1023, December.
    14. Beraudy, Sébastien & Absi, Nabil & Dauzère-Pérès, Stéphane, 2022. "Timed route approaches for large multi-product multi-step capacitated production planning problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 300(2), pages 602-614.
    15. Ingmar Steinzen & Vitali Gintner & Leena Suhl & Natalia Kliewer, 2010. "A Time-Space Network Approach for the Integrated Vehicle- and Crew-Scheduling Problem with Multiple Depots," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 44(3), pages 367-382, August.
    16. Rönnberg, Elina & Larsson, Torbjörn, 2014. "All-integer column generation for set partitioning: Basic principles and extensions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 233(3), pages 529-538.
    17. Heykel Achour & Michel Gamache & François Soumis & Guy Desaulniers, 2007. "An Exact Solution Approach for the Preferential Bidding System Problem in the Airline Industry," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 41(3), pages 354-365, August.
    18. Issmail Elhallaoui & Daniel Villeneuve & François Soumis & Guy Desaulniers, 2005. "Dynamic Aggregation of Set-Partitioning Constraints in Column Generation," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 53(4), pages 632-645, August.
    19. Ernst, A. T. & Jiang, H. & Krishnamoorthy, M. & Sier, D., 2004. "Staff scheduling and rostering: A review of applications, methods and models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 153(1), pages 3-27, February.
    20. Sami Gabteni & Mattias Grönkvist, 2009. "Combining column generation and constraint programming to solve the tail assignment problem," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 171(1), pages 61-76, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    crew scheduling problems;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ems:eureir:1649. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: RePub (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feeurnl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.